Attorneys general from more than 30 states including Arkansas recently announced a bipartisan effort to bring down costs and create more choices at the supermarket.
State law enforcement agencies are pledging to work with the U.S. Department of Agriculture's new Agricultural Competition Partnership to investigate price gouging in the food industry.
Arkansas has a law on the books prohibiting businesses from price gouging during a state of emergency.
Teresa Murray, consumer watchdog with the Public Interest Research Group, said while recent inflation spikes have been a factor, it is worth taking a closer look.
"We very much believe in a free market," Murray emphasized. "But not when it comes to crossing the line of trying to take advantage of individuals and families who are just trying to feed their kids. "
Beyond price structures, the USDA noted Arkansas and affected states will also be on the lookout for conflicts of interest, misuse of intellectual property, and anticompetitive barriers across the food and agriculture supply chains. Business groups such as the U.S. Chamber of Commerce oppose the move, calling it an "overreach."
Murray noted while there have been rumblings about these issues, it is hard to go into a grocery store, observe higher prices, and know for sure whether corporate greed is at play.
"What are the manufacturing costs? What are the labor costs, which probably have gone up? What are the supply-chain costs? What are the distribution costs?" Murray outlined. "And then where, at the end, is there a profit, and is anybody along the way taking advantage of the situation?"
Murray added there is no real federal statute addressing price gouging, so state enforcement will be important. Arkansas's price gouging law is triggered whenever a state of emergency is declared by federal, state or local governments. But not all states do, and some are limited in scope.
get more stories like this via email
A new study showed the flame retardants used in the seats of many cars emit toxic gases, and recommended the federal government reevaluate its flammability standards.
Researchers at Duke University and the Green Science Policy Institute in Berkeley studied the air and foam from 101 cars model year 2015 and newer, and found traces of two carcinogens on California's Prop. 65 list of harmful chemicals.
Robert Herrell, executive director of the Consumer Federation of California, called on the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration or state officials to act.
"We would hope that the relevant federal authorities would take a look at this," Herrell urged. "They have indicated that they're aware of this study, they're reviewing it. In some cases, California chooses not to wait necessarily for the feds to act, and we can try to act ahead of that."
The Alliance for Automotive Innovation said in a statement, "Automakers are committed to sustainability and include approved flame retardants in all passenger vehicles to meet the flammability standards required by the federal government to reduce...deaths and injuries to motor vehicle occupants caused by vehicle fires."
The study, in the journal Environmental Science & Technology, found the chemicals are released into the air two to five times more often in the summer when the car is hot. It recommended people park in the shade, air out their cars before getting in and avoid using the recirculated air feature in their vehicles.
Herrell noted his group fought to get the government to require furniture manufacturers to phase out similar flame retardants.
"Historically, the auto industry has really lagged behind on safety and consumer protection issues," Herrell asserted. "More often than not, they've been sort of dragged kicking and screaming into the modern age."
The flame retardants at issue do not prevent burning but they slow a fire's progression. Many fires starting inside cars begin with a dropped cigarette, so some experts have suggested the feds update flammability standards with a new anti-smoldering requirement, which could be met without the use of these types of chemicals.
get more stories like this via email
Supply chain disruptions mean consumers who need prescriptions filled in Indiana and around the country are running into roadblocks.
Parents and caregivers have limited options, as the availability of generic medications is running low. There are several causes: Inoperable manufacturing plants cause production delays and back orders pile up. A key pharmaceutical ingredient needed to make a certain medicine has been discontinued, causing additional problems.
Veronica Vernon, assistant professor of pharmacy practice at Butler University, called the situation dire.
"We're seeing one of the worst cases of prescription drug shortages that we've seen in recent years," Vernon observed. "Unfortunately, this is a cause for concern because you go to the pharmacy and expect them to have the medication in stock, and they don't."
Vernon acknowledged pharmacists cannot guarantee patients when a certain medication will be delivered. She advised parents and caregivers to schedule refills up to two weeks in advance to make sure they will be ready on time, if the pharmacy can even get the medication.
According to Singlecare.com, atorvastatin, sold under the brand name Lipitor, was the most prescribed drug in Indiana last year. It's used to lower cholesterol.
The shortages affect both brand name and generic drugs. Vernon suggested keeping good lines of communication open with your pharmacist and asking if there are any negative health risks tied to taking a generic, if one is available.
"One of the most important things you can do is to always keep a list of your current medications with you," Vernon recommended. "And also keep a record of what you've tried in the past. When my patients experience a shortage, I'll say let's try this other medication that's in the same class is expected to have the same effect. Have you tried that before?"
Statista.com estimated the total market for generic drugs worldwide was estimated at $412 billion in 2022 and the figure is expected to increase to more than $600 billion by 2030.
get more stories like this via email
Just last month, a California man was sentenced to four years in prison for being the mastermind behind romance scams - in which he received hundreds of thousands of dollars from two elderly Arizona women - according to the Arizona Attorney General's Office.
One local group is sounding the alarm.
Dawn Alexander is a communications analyst with AARP Arizona, and wants to encourage all Arizonans to be mindful about who they're speaking to and how much information they're giving out.
"These romance scams, they'll start to ask for gift cards, they'll start to ask for money, and then they'll get more brazen," said Alexander. "A lot of times, it can easily turn into a money mule situation - which is basically they will eventually gain access to their bank accounts and start running money fraudulently through those."
Alexander added that while romance scams can start on dating apps, they can also start through less conventional avenues.
She added that romance scammers look to exploit the desire for love and companionship - and says warning signs can include professing love early on, someone who needs money to deal with an emergency, or an individual who makes plans to meet in person but never follows through.
Alexander contended that as technology and things such as artificial intelligence get more advanced, so do the scams.
She added that AI has enabled scammers to more easily produce things such as photos and videos which seem legitimate.
She said AARP has the AARP Fraud Watch Network, which is a free resource for both AARP members and nonmembers alike. She said if you're in doubt, there are those who are ready to help.
"They can reach out to AARP.org/fraudwatchnetwork or they can call a toll-free number, 1-877-908-3360," said Alexander, "and they will speak to an actual person who can assist them with any of their concerns."
Alexander said another tip is to never send money including wire transfers or cryptocurrency to a stranger or someone you met online, as she said they're wanting forms of payment to be what she calls "untraceable."
Disclosure: AARP Arizona contributes to our fund for reporting on Budget Policy & Priorities, Consumer Issues, Health Issues, Senior Issues. If you would like to help support news in the public interest,
click here.
get more stories like this via email