By Britny Cordera for imagine5.com.
Broadcast version by Suzanne Potter for California News Service reporting for the Solutions Journalism Network-Public News Service Collaboration

On Earth Day 2023, thousands of people around the world took part in protests to draw attention to the threats facing the planet.

While some waved signs and chanted slogans in the street, another group gathered online to take action in a different way, united by two things: their concern for the health of the world's waters, and their shared love of Disney's The Little Mermaid.

A campaign called "Protect Ariel's Home" centres Ariel the mermaid (and other Disney characters who live close to the water, like Lilo from Lilo & Stitch, Tiana from The Princess and the Frog and the title character from Moana). It emphasises the importance of keeping rivers, oceans, and drinking water clean for all, especially people in BIPOC communities who are at the frontline of climate change.

The campaign has held three virtual rallies where 79 actions have been taken, ranging from messaging President Joe Biden to shut down Line 5 (an Enbridge oil pipeline that could threaten the fisheries and wild rice harvest relied on by Indigenous people around Lake Superior) to checking an underwater webcam in a river in the Netherlands to alert the lockkeeper if there are fish that need to get through to lay eggs. This work is being done by fans, without Disney's involvement.

The idea came from Ana-Rikki Wilhelm, an intern at an organisation called Fandom Forward, which is working on the campaign with the non-profit GreenLatinos, TikTok viral activist Western Water Girl and award winning Diné journalist from the Navajo Nation Alastair Lee Bitsóí.

Wilhelm noticed how much energy there was around The Little Mermaid after Disney revealed its first teaser trailer. "Disney received backlash on casting Halle Bailey as Ariel, but seeing Black girls on TikTok overjoyed by a Black Ariel was really inspiring," they said.

This kind of inspiration, Wilhelm believes, is a chance for fans to connect what's happening in real life - rising sea levels, oil spills and dying coral, or the water crises in Flint, Michigan and Jackson, Mississippi - to what could happen to our favourite fictional characters.

"Fan organising allows people to say, oh yeah, I wouldn't want Ariel or Lilo or Tiana to have toxic water and not be able to swim or not be able to have fun," Wilhelm said. "It frames the climate crisis in a less intimidating and scary way so people feel more comfortable getting involved."

Representation in media can often be an important first step for people to understand change that is happening all around them. For Alexis Trotter, a self-proclaimed Disney super fan, when she sees characters that look like her, she's more intrigued to learn about their world. "When you see yourself represented, it just allows your imagination to easily put yourself into the story," she said.

Trotter who took part in the Ariel campaign, doesn't get involved in a lot of climate advocacy - she has a heart defect and puts most of her energy into advocacy around this - but since this campaign involved one of her favourite characters, it was different. "I was proud to have my name on this campaign and went into it with excitement about the new movie," she said.

Inspiration to make small changes

Trotter, who uses reusable K-cups for her coffee and reminds her friends and family every day to recycle to keep plastic waste out of our waters, says: "Our favorite Disney princesses or Marvel superheroes teach us you can make a pretty significant change by making small changes."

The Ariel campaign is the latest in a proud tradition. Groups like Fandom Forward, Black Nerds Create and Nerdfighter have been creating activists out of fans online for more than a decade, inspired by our favourite pop culture characters.

Fandom Forward was one of the first organisations to do this kind of activism. Founded in 2005 as The Harry Potter Alliance, it has since expanded to get fans of Disney, DC Comics, Star Trek and other fandoms, involved in environmental and civic engagement.

It's known as fan activism or fanwork, and it taps into the idea that - as our favourite characters often teach us - there's no one way to be a hero.

Organising activism around the fictional characters we love can help activate the public imagination around climate change and environmental injustices while helping fans do advocacy work that is more accessible and less daunting than protesting.

Critical fandom

Some are calling the trend critical fandom, which probably makes it sound less fun than it is. I got my own taste of it in 2021 when I attended an online rally that tapped into two of my passions: the hit TV cartoon Avatar: The Last Airbender (or ATLA, as it is known by its fiercely dedicated fans), and environmental justice.

It came at the height of the pandemic, at a time when I was looking for some way to help despite not being able to be some place in person. Fandom Forward used ATLA, which features a strong message about protecting nature, to inspire fans to campaign against the expansion of the Line 3 oil pipeline from Canada to Wisconsin. They partnered with Indigenous-led organisations A Tribe Called Geek and Honor the Earth. 424 actions were taken during that campaign, off the back of a 90-minute rally on YouTube Live.

Shortly after that, I held my own ATLA watch party with friends. We reflected on how relevant the show continues to be, how it teaches us to care for people and the environment over objects and money, and how it paints a picture of fascism that feels eerily relevant. I also got my friends to take some of the actions proposed by Fandom Forward.

Fandom Forward's campaigns director, Sara Mortensen, said campaigns around climate change can be seamlessly introduced, because fans are already doing things together. "Fandoms that have a lot of energy, you'll see fan leaders organising birthday messages for their favourite actors, or organising community spaces in [the messaging app] Discord or elsewhere," she said.

Fandom Forward and other organisations recognise this potential and push the energy towards climate or social justice issues, Mortensen said. "It helps that so many of our favourite stories have something to say about climate and the environment," she said.

ATLA is a great example of this. In one storyline, the hero Aang and his friends must help a village impacted by a toxic river polluted by the powerful Fire Nation. In the new live action version of The Little Mermaid, Ariel and her sisters are seen cleaning up a shipwreck under the sea, and lamenting how humans are killing coral reefs.

Fans are digging deeper

Critical fandom has the power to make fans care about environment and climate issues. Maritza Mendoza, a water equity and ocean program advocate for GreenLatinos recognises this power. She said people who care about The Little Mermaid tend to also care about or have an interest in the ocean. "For people who don't identify as activists or don't have a degree in water conservation, fan organising can help you learn about climate change and show that your community cares about it," she said.

Robyn Renee Jordan of Black Nerds Create says the way media reflects our real world can inspire critical fandom. "It is great to love something," she said, "but it is even more powerful to really dig deep and look at media from a critical lens and see how that reflects the world around us."

Jordan said its important to follow your passions when doing activism. It's how it keeps you going. Fan organising leans on fans' passions for pop-culture icons and doesn't expect fans to have experience doing activism.

"If you're watching The Little Mermaid and it makes you think, 'look how beautiful our oceans are', and makes you want to do something about preserving water, and you ask how do we continue to maintain that, follow that thought process and don't worry too much about getting it right. Worry about just attempting to do something or to learn more."


Britny Cordera wrote this article for imagine5.com.


get more stories like this via email

New England fishermen and environmental groups are working to prevent the growth of industrial-size fish farms in U.S. open waters.

They said federal legislation known as the "AQUAA Act" would permit so-called "floating feedlots" similar to land-based dairy and poultry farms, known to use heavy amounts of pesticides and antibiotics.

James Mitchell, legislative director for the advocacy group Don't Cage Our Oceans, said there is no way to contain the chemicals or tons of untreated fish waste created.

"In fact, the whole reason for it is to rely on Mother Nature for its ecosystem services, to wash away the pollutants from the fish themselves so that they don't go belly up," Mitchell pointed out.

Backers of large-scale aquaculture argued it is needed to feed the world but studies show such farms often produce fewer fish than the number of wild fish taken from the ocean to make fish food.

Maine's abundant coastline and history of working waterfronts make it an ideal place for an aquaculture business, and numerous small-scale shellfish and marine plant farms are boosting local economies. But commercial fishermen say the growth of large, foreign-owned fish farms endangers both the ocean and their livelihoods.

Jason Jarvis, commercial fisherman and board president of the North American Marine Alliance, said aquaculture should be locally owned and low-impact.

"I think if we had multiple, small-scale aquaponics systems -- compared to large, industrial-size aquaculture -- I mean, it's a big difference in who benefits and how you benefit," Jarvis explained.

Jarvis noted it is the small- and medium-scale fishermen feeding their communities who keep working waterfronts alive. He added there is no guarantee in the AQUAA Act farm-raised fish would stay in the U.S., which already imports more than 90% of the seafood it consumes.

A working group convened by the California Department of Fish and Wildlife meets today to consider a partial closure of the commercial Dungeness crab fishing season, amid concerns too many whales and sea turtles are getting tangled up in the crab gear.

The ropes, which run from crab traps on the seafloor up to a buoy on the surface can become twisted around an animal's body. Last year, the gear entangled at least five humpback whales and killed a critically endangered Pacific leatherback sea turtle.

Andrea Treece, senior attorney for Earthjustice, a nonprofit public-interest environmental law organization, detailed the concerns.

"We leave too much gear on the water too late in the season, we wait until the risk is elevated," Treece pointed out. "Too often, it's too late to protect those whales. And so we need to really learn our lesson from the past."

The danger is greatest in the spring, summer and fall, when humpback whales migrate to California from Mexico and South America. The Department of Fish and Wildlife's risk assessment team is recommending the commercial fishery close April 5 south of the Sonoma/Mendocino County line, and would restrict the depth at which the crab traps can be set in northern California waters.

Treece thinks the department should announce a statewide closure as soon as possible, as it will take weeks to retrieve the gear and whales can quickly move north into areas with a lot of gear still in the water. She added a new type of ropeless gear is being tested, which could make a big difference once it is approved for use.

"We could be looking at a future where this fishery has to operate between January and March," Treece noted. "With a thoughtful transition to ropeless gear, we could be looking at a future where the fishery is operating for its full season."

A new public service announcement from the nonprofit Oceana includes video of a humpback whale filmed in 2022, entangled in ropes. The whale swam more than 1,000 miles, dragging the discarded crab gear for a year before it was discovered.


get more stories like this via email

A new bill aims to reduce the number of sea lions, sharks, rays, skates and giant sea bass dying off the coast of Southern California in huge set gillnets the size of 20 football fields, weighted to the sea floor.

Right now, set gillnets are banned in most state waters and Assembly Bill 2220 would extend the ban to a 3-mile radius around the Channel Islands.

Caitlynn Birch, Pacific marine scientist for Oceana, said the bill also stops crews profiting from certain species accidentally caught in the nets.

"It will remove the exemption that allows set gill net fisheries to incidentally catch and sell great white sharks and giant sea bass, which are both protected species and not allowed to take commercially or recreationally for any other fisheries in California," Birch pointed out.

Opponents cited concerns about the effect on fishing crews' bottom line. About 30 fishermen still have active set gillnet permits in Southern California. The state has stopped issuing new permits and the bill would make existing permits nontransferable.

The bill would also give the California Department of Fish and Wildlife the authority to require independent monitors on fishing boats but would not make them mandatory. Right now it is up to fishing crews to self-report when they accidentally catch a protected species.

"Having the authority to place third-party observers on vessels would allow for the collection of unbiased data on specifically bycatch, which is being thrown overboard at sea and isn't otherwise able to be tracked," Birch explained.

Supporters contended more selective hook and line fishing methods have significantly less bycatch and typically yield higher prices for fish considered better quality seafood.