COLUMBUS, Ohio - Ohio Right to Life released its 2015 legislative agenda on Tuesday, including what it calls six "pro-life initiatives." The group is proposing four new bans on ending pregnancies, including a bill that prohibits abortion after 20 weeks gestation.
Kellie Copeland, executive director of NARAL Pro-Choice Ohio, said she sees it as what she calls a "dangerous agenda" that could interfere with doctor-patient relationships.
"People receive all sorts of complicated diagnoses during pregnancy; they face a myriad of different situations," she said. "These decisions should be made by women in consultation with their doctors, not by politicians."
In a statement, Ohio Right to Life said the United States is one of only seven nations that permits abortions after 20 weeks.
Ohio Right to Life also is proposing a so-called "trigger clause" that would take effect should the U.S. Supreme Court overturn the Roe vs. Wade decision. It would prohibit all abortions in the state except those necessary to save the mother's life.
Copeland said a ban sidesteps protecting women's health.
"The question isn't whether or not women should be able to have abortions," she said. "It's whether or not they should be able to have them safely, because it doesn't matter whether or not abortion is legal. Abortion will still happen. What matters is, will it be safe?"
Anti-abortion groups in Ohio had a recent series of legislative wins, including a ban on abortions after 24 weeks of pregnancy. However, with abortion procedures at a 37-year low, Copeland said she believes the focus should shift to measures that support reproductive health.
"Anti-choice groups refuse to work with us on the things that we know that work - like access to contraception, like access to comprehensive sex education," she said. "But we will continue to pursue those policies, because they're good public policy and good health policy."
The agenda also de-funds an infant-mortality prevention program conducted by Planned Parenthood and provides tax dollars to unregulated anti-abortion facilities known as "crisis pregnancy centers."
Ohio Right to Life's legislative agenda is online at ohiolife.org.
get more stories like this via email
State Rep. Susie Lee - D-Las Vegas - said she wants women in Nevada and across the country to wake up, as she contends far-right extremists are wanting to restrict in-vitro fertilization and other assisted reproductive technology.
Lee joined her Democratic colleagues in calling for the passage of the Access to Family Building Act, which would establish a legal right to IVF and other services - overriding the state's effort to limit or ban access as was achieved in Alabama.
As someone who used IVF to have her own family, Lee said she feels like it is an important piece of legislation.
"I feel that any Republican who says we support IVF should be signing on to that," said Lee. "Instead, what we've seen are these non-binding resolutions. Well, if you really believe that women should have a right and families should have a right to pursue and build a family, then sign onto the bill."
Lee said only one House Republican has signed on to support the Access to Family Building Act.
In the Silver State, a coalition of reproductive rights groups have launched an effort to place an amendment on the November ballot to safeguard abortion rights in the Nevada constitution.
Organizers say they'll also aim to use frustration over the recent Alabama ruling to garner support for their ballot measure.
Alexa Solis is deputy director for the nonpartisan and nonprofit organization called Planned Parenthood Votes Nevada.
She said while it is too early to say what the Alabama decision means for IVF as a whole, she says we live in a world where people travel to states like Nevada where abortion is legal.
"So if there were more rulings or legislation or other actions that would take us in the direction of this Alabama decision," said Solis, "you could see a world in which people are once again forced to travel for care that they should be able to get in their home state."
According to a recent CBS News-YouGov poll, an overwhelming majority of Americans believe IVF should be legal.
The poll was conducted following Alabama's court ruling which ruled that frozen embryos should be considered people.
get more stories like this via email
Nearly 80% of California women age 40 and older say they are highly motivated to vote, according to a new survey from AARP.
Researchers for the new "She's the Difference" California survey polled 1,600 women and found many are highly concerned about political divisions.
Kate Bridges, senior research adviser for AARP, said older women are an influential voting bloc.
"Not only are they sizable in number, but they consistently vote," Bridges pointed out. "In the 2022 election, they cast a third of the ballots, while only making up about a quarter of the full electorate."
Survey respondents' top issues, in order, are threats to democracy, voting rights, jobs, education, political division, and inflation. Also of high importance are gun violence, election security, crime, housing costs, abortion, racism, immigration and climate change.
Lucia Del Puppo, senior vice president of Los Angeles-based FM3 Research, reported almost half of women said they are less financially secure than they expected to be at this age and they want elected officials to focus on protecting Medicare and lowering the cost of living.
"The things that were most helpful were lowering the cost of food, protecting Social Security, lowering the cost of utilities, decreasing taxes, and lowering the cost of health care."
The survey found if the election were held now, 53% of respondents would favor Democrats, 29% prefer Republicans, 4% would go with another party and 13% are undecided. Among those survey, 92% said a candidate's values are the most important criteria when deciding who gets their vote.
Disclosure: AARP California contributes to our fund for reporting on Health Issues, and Senior Issues. If you would like to help support news in the public interest,
click here.
get more stories like this via email
The state has plans to demolish 26 Wyoming State Hospital buildings in Evanston, but some local residents believe the site, which dates back to 1886, is an important part of the town's cultural and historic fabric and should be preserved.
Vickie Fruits, a retired Wyoming State Hospital employee, worked for 37 years at the facility, which treated patients with mental illness. The hospital was the town's largest employer, and she said the majority of workers were women who played a range of roles, including some not traditionally held by women at the time.
"Registered nurses, LPNs, 'aides' back then but eventually they had to be certified nursing assistants, they would be in housekeeping, the cafeteria, social workers, doctors, quite a few female doctors," Fruits recounted.
The hospital still operates in a consolidated newer building. Once a large residential facility with up to 600 residents at a time, it mostly offers outpatient services today. It was listed on the National Register of Historic Places in 2003. The Wyoming Department of Health has said the buildings are old and beyond repair, and could begin demolition as early as July of this year.
Proponents of preserving the campus pointed to feasibility studies showing repurposing buildings would cost about three million dollars less than demolition.
Jim Davis, chair of the Evanston Historic Preservation Commission, said the architecturally significant brick buildings are still in good shape, and could be turned into housing and other uses to fuel the local economy into the future.
"When the buildings were occupied by the state, there were full-time electricians, full-time carpenters, full-time painters," Davis explained. "The buildings have stood the test of time and have been well taken care of. And they can be repurposed."
The 110-acre campus sits atop a hill overlooking town, and was designed to aid in patient recovery. There are expansive lawns and shade trees, and there was once a lake where residents could go fishing. Fruits added the hospital was also a model for self-sustaining communities.
"When I first started up there, there was the post office, there was a bowling alley, there was a tennis and a basketball court," Fruits recalled. "We had a dairy and garden. We pretty much supplied all of our own food."
get more stories like this via email