COLUMBUS, Ohio – Pro-choice advocates in Ohio are hailing a decision by the U.S. Supreme Court that strikes down key parts of a Texas law that severely restricts how abortion clinics could operate.
The ruling removes medical practice regulations placed on abortion clinics so restrictive that, since they were enacted in 2013, half of the clinics in Texas were forced to close their doors.
Cincinnati abortion rights attorney Jennifer Branch says it means starting now, courts will start taking a serious look at states that make it harder to access abortion care.
"The bottom line is that the state of Ohio has been told by this decision to stop adding restrictions to clinics purely for the purpose of shutting clinics down and prohibiting women's access to abortions," she stresses.
The decision, written by Justice Stephen Breyer, found the Texas law placed an "undue burden" on women seeking an abortion. Justice Anthony Kennedy was the swing vote in the decision.
Kellie Copeland, executive director of NARAL Pro-Choice Ohio, says with some other states, Ohio has been imposing unnecessary burdens on abortion care providers by saying they're protecting women.
She says that includes measures passed in recent years that require abortion providers to have a transfer agreement with a private hospital within 30 miles.
"There is a reproductive health care crisis, not just because women are having to delay care to abortion and because there are so many poor health outcomes, but also because we know that women are having to flee the state to access abortion care,” she states. “And Ohio, frankly, is a better state than that."
Sandy Theis heads the Why Courts Matter Ohio Coalition, which supports fully staffed federal courts. She contends the Texas ruling is a victory for the courts and women's health.
"It was never intended to improve women's health as its backers have insisted,” she maintains. “It was always intended to make an abortion much harder to get. It shows once again why our federal courts are vital to women's reproductive health. "
In a statement, Ohio Right to Life argued the ruling "tramples a state's right to safely regulate abortion facilities and protect the health and safety of women and children."
get more stories like this via email
Women in California and across the country earn an average of 82% of what men make in the first 10 years after graduating from college, according to a new study from the National Association of Colleges and Employers.
Researchers found that a significant portion of this disparity is attributed to where people work - three-quarters of men are employed in the private sector, compared to only half of women.
Mary Gatta is the director of research and public policy at NACE.
"The top industries where men were employed were manufacturing, finance, insurance, real estate, the fire industries, architecture, and engineering," said Gatta. "Women are in education, health care, social assistance, and professional and technical services. So women dominate more in lower-paid industries."
Advocates say school districts should introduce boys and girls to all types of occupations, and in particular, encourage girls to take classes in science, technology, engineering, and math.
California has tried to shrink the pay gap through public policy. Companies in the Golden State are prohibited from inquiring about a candidate's previous salary range during the hiring process.
They are also required to disclose salary ranges in job postings or upon request.
Gatta said colleges should offer robust career counseling to prepare students as they enter the workforce.
"We also need to think about salary negotiation," said Gatta, "and helping remove any concerns that recent college grads might have about negotiating, helping prepare students for salary negotiation."
She added that establishing a higher salary from the get-go pays dividends for many years.
Conversely, the pay gap persists as women progress in their careers, so they contribute less to Social Security and receive lower payments in retirement.
Support for this reporting was provided by Lumina Foundation.
get more stories like this via email
Texas lawmakers passed the Life of the Mother Act during the legislative session. It was billed as legislation to clarify when doctors in the state can legally perform an abortion.
Texas adopted one of the most restrictive abortion bans in 2021. The ban allows the procedure only if the life of the mother is in danger or there is a risk of impairment of a primary bodily function.
Houston-based OB/GYN Dr. Damla Karsan said, despite the "clarification," medical professionals are still hesitant to provide care in most cases.
"It's been frustrating, because I feel restricted in my ability to offer them the full scope of options for their care," said Karsan. "I know it's really had a chilling effect on all my colleagues, and myself as well."
Karsan was involved in two legal challenges to the abortion ban, including the case of Kate Cox.
The Houston mother of two received national attention after traveling to another state to have an abortion after it was determined her third child would not survive.
Backers of the new legislation say it ensures women who have medical emergencies can get an abortion.
It defines "life-threatening" as a condition that's capable of causing death or serious injury. A survey of OB/GYNs in the state shows 60% of those who responded fear legal repercussions.
Karsan said if women need abortion care, there are organizations available to help.
"I direct a lot of people to the National Network of Abortion Funds," said Karsan. "Their website can connect you if you want to donate, if you want to volunteer, but also if you're looking for care. As usual it's the poor, the disenfranchised that are going to suffer the most."
According to the survey, many doctors are leaving the state or going into early retirement because of the abortion ban.
get more stories like this via email
Fighting for a wide range of people with a skill for compromise, is how Rep. Melissa Hortman, D-Brooklyn Park, is being remembered for following her assassination Saturday.
A civic engagement group said she was a shining example of a woman in politics. Hortman's murder is seen by political observers as a stunning and tragic example of the increasingly violent tone surrounding public office in America. Hortman served as Minnesota House Speaker from 2019 until earlier this year, leading Democrats during power-sharing negotiations with Republicans in an evenly-divided chamber.
Michelle Witte, executive director of the League of Women Voters of Minnesota, said Hortman stayed true to the mission of an elected official.
"Obviously, (a) rise to power but also just being in the community working at all levels, at the local level to engage people in issues that are important to them," Witte recounted.
Witte noted Hortman's willingness to make tough decisions was on display this spring when finalizing a new budget, as she received pushback from her own party during the negotiations. Witte pointed out Minnesota still has gaps in electing women legislators, despite having more female politicians than over half the states in the U.S.
She added Hortman was among the most notable women in politics statewide, with others including Sen. Amy Klobuchar, D-Minn., and Sen. Tina Smith, D-Minn.
In 2023, Hortman was credited for spearheading several major policies including paid medical leave, abortion protections, and a universal school meal program. While this year's power-sharing agreement with Republicans did have moments of friction, Witte said Hortman's arrangement with GOP House Speaker Lisa Demuth was symbolic of women succeeding in the world of politics.
"The League of Women Voters, we actually made a card out of the great handshake between Melissa Hortman and Lisa Demuth when they reach their power-sharing agreement," Witte recalled. "I was so proud of that because that is what we really work for at the League, is seeing that working together."
Witte hopes voters pay more attention to those examples of bipartisanship and appreciate elected leaders who go above and beyond to serve the public. She acknowledged the attacks on Minnesota lawmakers may make people feel anxious about taking part in democracy, adding the country needs to promote voter safety and prevent future candidates from being silenced.
get more stories like this via email