ALAMOGORDO, N.M. - From 2002 to 2011, 266 chimpanzees left the Coulston Foundation in Alamogordo for the Save The Chimps sanctuary in Fort Pierce, Fla. Now another exodus could be in the offing.
Last week, recommendations made to the National Institutes of Health by an internal committee concluded that chimpanzees no longer were needed in most experiments, so most of the federally owned chimps could be retired. That would mean many of the 169 chimps being held at Holloman Air Force Base in Alamogordo as well as chimps in two other facilities could be moving to a sanctuary.
It's not a certainty, however. Justin Goodman, director of the laboratory investigations department at People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals, says public comment will be one of the deciding factors.
"We really need to see public policy and laboratory practice evolve with the public's changing attitude, especially because these experiments are supposedly conducted for the public's benefit," Goodman says. "If that's really true, these policies have to be aligned with where the public's mind is at."
The public has until March 22 to make itself heard by filling out an online form to be considered by NIH before the institute pronounces its verdict on the future of these animals. People who want to participate in the decision-making process for the future of the federally owned chimpanzees can fill out the form by clicking here.
NIH director Dr. Francis Collins is expected to announce his findings in late March.
Chimps have been used in invasive medical research, behavioral studies and the entertainment industry and pet trade. Dr. Stacy Lopresti-Goodman, assistant professor of psychology at Marymount University in Arlington, Va., works with chimpanzees in sanctuaries to help them overcome what she characterizes as post-traumatic stress disorder caused by their experiences in these situations.
"Forcibly separating chimpanzees from their mothers at an early age; keeping them socially isolated for prolonged periods of time; repeatedly shooting them with a dart gun can result in the chimpanzees being terrified that every time a human walks into a room that they might hurt them," she says.
The chimpanzees retired from the Coulston Foundation were moved to Save the Chimps, a sanctuary in Florida where Jen Feuerstein is director. She says the difference in conditions of laboratory life and sanctuary life is like night and day.
"The facility in New Mexico was dismal; a stark utilitarian facility, concrete and steel," she says. "It was cages. In Florida, they have three acres without being in a cage, and they have large family groups."
Should the chimps at the Air Force base be retired, many of them will be moved to Chimp Haven, a sanctuary in Keithville, La.
The recommendation report is available online at dpcpsi.nih.gov. The public comment form is at grants.nih.gov.
get more stories like this via email
The state Department of Natural Resources and Iowa State University are looking for volunteers to help create a new Bumble Bee Atlas.
Bees are an important part of the ecosystem, and scientists are figuring out their habitats to help them thrive.
Iowa is home to at least 14 species of bumble bees that help pollinate native wildflowers and flowering crops in farm fields and backyard gardens.
Iowa State University University Professor of Sustainable Agriculture and plant pathologist Matt O'Neal said the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service recently listed several bee species as endangered.
"And that includes the Rusty Patch bumble bee," said O'Neal, "20% of what it used to be, and that includes parts of Iowa. There is also evidence that other bumble species are in decline and so, this survey will give us a chance to see where those bees are and how abundant they are."
With that information, O'Neal said scientists can work to protect the bees' habitats and create Iowa's Bumble Bee Atlas.
It's part of a larger project to map the bees and foster bee development nationwide. Sign up online to volunteer.
The national project is part of a collaboration with the Xerces Society for Invertebrate Conservation.
Some 900 people have volunteered for the national atlas project, and counted more than 20,000 bumble bees - which O'Neal said face several major threats.
"Pesticide exposure, parasite and pathogens," said O'Neal, "and then the last 'P,' and probably the most important, is poor forage."
The researchers will work to alleviate those threats by knowing where the bees are.
Volunteers have discovered species thought to be gone from their states, contributed to new field guides, and improved scientists' understanding of bumble bee populations across the country.
get more stories like this via email
A coalition of conservation groups has sued the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service for refusing to relist wolves under the Endangered Species Act.
Helena-based Alliance for the Wild Rockies is part of the suit. The Alliance sued to successfully overturn the wolf's delisting in 2012 but the move fell victim to congressional funding bill negotiations.
Mike Garrity, executive director of the alliance, said the wolves clearly qualify to be protected under the Act and hunting is driving down their numbers, which could cause problems for the animals.
"As their numbers decline, they are at greater risk for inbreeding," Garrity pointed out. "Once inbreeding sets in, the population is sunk."
Livestock and cattle owners argued wolves are a threat to their flocks and herds and want their numbers reduced. The suit was filed in federal District Court in Missoula.
Beyond keeping a robust population of wolves on Montana's lands and helping their species thrive, Garrity noted wolves can also help reduce the population of diseased animals.
"We're starting to have disease in deer, such as Chronic Wasting Disease," Garrity explained. "Predators like wolves are really good at focusing on the sick animals, so that's an excellent way to control Chronic Wasting Disease."
Garrity added wolf management policies in Montana, Idaho and Wyoming, all of which allow aggressive hunting of the animals, fail to protect wolves and all native species for future generations, the primary mandate of the Endangered Species Act.
Disclosure: Alliance for the Wild Rockies contributes to our fund for reporting on Endangered Species & Wildlife, Environment. If you would like to help support news in the public interest,
click here.
get more stories like this via email
A lawsuit over a federal agency's decision not to boost wolf protections in New Mexico and other western states has been filed, days after video surfaced showing the torture of a captured wolf.
According to accounts, a Wyoming man ran the wolf down with a snowmobile in late February, disabling it. He then took it to a local bar and posed for photos before shooting it.
Erik Molvar, executive director of the Western Watersheds Project, said federal protections under the Endangered Species Act are essential because there are still those who don't respect wildlife.
"That's why wolves were driven extinct in the first place, is because these types of people were the ones who controlled the public policy discussion throughout much of the 20th century when wolves were driven extinct," he said.
In early February, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service declined to restore protections for gray wolves in western states. The agency said it concluded the animals weren't in danger of extinction under the Endangered Species Act.
The lawsuit was filed by the Western Environmental Law Center on behalf of Western Watersheds and a coalition of nine other conservation groups.
Molvar believes the federal agency's decision not to re-designate western wolves as "endangered" was profoundly misguided. He said some states such as New Mexico and Colorado have adopted extra penalties for killing wolves, but the Endangered Species Act lets hunters in other states off the hook if they claim it was a case of mistaken identity.
"There were special loopholes for Wyoming, Idaho and Montana - and also parts of Oregon, Washington and Utah - so it does beg the question of how often this is happening quietly and under the radar," he explained.
In Wyoming, wolves and coyotes, which are considered predators, aren't eligible for protections under the state's animal cruelty statute. To date, the only penalty inflicted on the person shown on social media tormenting the wolf was a $250 fine by the Wyoming Game and Fish Department.
Disclosure: Defenders of Wildlife contributes to our fund for reporting on Climate Change/Air Quality, Endangered Species & Wildlife, Energy Policy, Public Lands/Wilderness. If you would like to help support news in the public interest,
click here.
get more stories like this via email