Albuquerque, NM – Nuevo México podría ser el líder en la minería del siglo XXI. El Senador Bingaman, quien preside el Comité del Senado de Recursos Naturales, está preparando ser líder de una cuenta de ley que reformaría la ley de 1872 que gobierna sobre la minería de piedra en tierras federales. Bajo la actual ley, las garantías federales ambientales no siempre son aplicadas a las compañías mineras, y no tienen que pagar regalías por recursos extraídos de tierras públicas como lo hacen las compañías de petróleo y gas natural.
Nathan Newcomer, Director Asociado de la New Mexico Wilderness Alliance (Alianza de Nuevo México de Parques Naturales) en Albuquerque menciona que ya es hora de que la industria minera pague.
"Esto es incrédulo, considerando el daño que la minería causa al la calidad del agua y a las tierras públicas."
La reforma a la ley minera que está siendo considerada en el congreso requerirá de pagos por regalías. Mientras que las compañías mineras dicen que no se oponen a pagar regalías, creen que las cantidades propuestas y otros cargos son muy altos y que pueden causar despidos y que operaciones mineras pequeñas no ocurran. Pero los que apoyan la reforma dicen que cargos por reclamación pueden ayudar a los gobiernos locales que se encuentran sufriendo al proveerles con fondos para limpiar los sitios de minas abandonadas y a la vez crear empleos.
La Casa de Representantes ya tuvo su audiencia a principios de este año acerca de su versión de la reforma minera y Newcomer anticipa la introducción de la cuenta de ley en el Senado. También comparte que reformar esta ley es especialmente importante para la Tierra del Encanto, la cuál es hogar de más de 21 mil derechos de minería activos y de unas estimadas 20 mil minas abandonadas.
"Muchas de las cuales no tenemos información de donde se encuentran o que tipos de tóxicos se filtran hacia nuestras cuencas de agua del oeste."
Dice Newcomer que la manera en la que operan las minas ahora bajo la ley antigua deja a los gobiernos federales y locales atados de pies y manos con poco poder para poder poner alto a las compañías mineras, aún cuando se enfrentan con oposición de la comunidad local.
"Eso es bastante inquietante cuando tenemos una industria que viene y básicamente se llevan todo por debajo de nuestros pies, no pagan ni un centavo por ello, y después no toman en cuenta ninguna de tus preocupaciones acerca de la protección de la flora y fauna, de las áreas salvajes o de la calidad del agua."
get more stories like this via email
Crews have been ramping up wildfire resilience projects to thin out brush and dead wood in California's giant sequoia groves, clearing twice as many acres in 2023 compared with 2022.
The Giant Sequoia Lands Coalition is trying to avoid a repeat of the disastrous mega-fires of 2020 and 2021 - which killed about 20% of large mature trees in their native Sierra Nevada range.
Joanna Nelson, Ph.D. is the director of science and conservation planning with the nonprofit Save the Redwoods League.
"We remove fuel," said Nelson, "we get to a safe place to do prescribed burning and to do cultural burning - which is always led by Indigenous people, which is another practice of taking care of the forest and reducing wildfire risk."
Sequoia National Park is just one part of California's giant sequoia groves, which stretch over 26,000 acres.
A new report shows that in 2023, the program treated nearly 9,900 acres in 28 groves - and more than 14,000 since 2021.
Crews have also planted 542,000 native tree seedlings in severely burned areas over the past two years.
Nelson said the groves must be re-treated about every 8 to 10 years.
"The cost of inaction is loss of giant sequoias in their native range," said Nelson. "And big fires that spread because of the fuel continuity. We risk further loss of trees that are anywhere from 1,000 to 3,000 years old if we do nothing."
The groves have built up quite a bit of dead wood fuel because, until the last few decades, it had been national policy to suppress almost all fire - which led to intense firestorms that incinerated entire groves of old-growth trees.
It is now understood that judicious use of fire can clear out the understory and be beneficial to the forest.
Disclosure: Save the Redwoods League contributes to our fund for reporting on Climate Change/Air Quality, Endangered Species & Wildlife, Environment, Public Lands/Wilderness. If you would like to help support news in the public interest,
click here.
get more stories like this via email
The Bureau of Land Management has proposed expanding the public land available for solar power production in 11 states, including Montana.
The BLM's Western Solar Plan builds on a version first released in 2012 and focuses on harnessing the potential in Western and Plains states most amenable to solar production.
Nick Fitzmaurice, energy transition engineer for the Montana Environmental Information Center, said the expanded plan reflects the country's growing demand for solar energy.
"It's projected that 700,000 acres of solar development are going to be needed to meet future clean goals, and in the range of about 5,000 of those acres are going to be in Montana," Fitzmaurice explained. "It's a small part of the picture but important that all our open land that is able to contribute to solar can do so."
The Wilderness Society released a statement supporting the proposed Western Solar Plan expansion. The BLM is taking public comment on it until April 18.
The BLM has already done an environmental impact statement, which can sometimes be a stumbling block for such projects.
Fitzmaurice pointed out Montana was not part of the first Western Solar Plan. He thinks adding the state and having the BLM involved in siting the facilities will be crucial as Montana takes advantage of its alternative energy opportunities.
"It's really important that BLM gets ahead of this," Fitzmaurice asserted. "As these applications for development come in, they are able to be sited and put in locations that will minimize the impact on this important public land resource that we have."
Fitzmaurice added the plan proposes solar facilities be built near existing power transmission lines but not near culturally sensitive areas of Montana. Critics of the proposal said additional solar development could threaten wildlife species and habitat.
get more stories like this via email
The remote landscape of southeastern Oregon is receiving additional protections.
The Bureau of Land Management has finalized its resource management plan for the southeast corner of the state and it includes protections for parts of the Owyhee and Malheur Rivers and canyon lands in the region.
Michael O'Casey, deputy director of forest policy and Northwest programs for the Theodore Roosevelt Conservation Partnership, said it's an exciting announcement, which will protect sensitive landscape from activities like surface development and road building.
"When that landscape is impacted, it's really hard to bring it back and restore it," O'Casey pointed out. "And so, it's really important to protect the places out there that are healthy and intact and resistant. And resilience is a term that we use, to stresses from climate change or whatever else."
O'Casey noted the plan still allows for traditional uses of the land like hunting and fishing. The BLM's final resource management plan for the district covers four-point-six million acres of public land.
O'Casey stressed the agency deliberated for years on this decision.
"This planning process was initiated in 2010 and so it's been 14 years in the making," O'Casey emphasized. "The good news is that, even though it's been a really long time, was that there was a really robust public comment process throughout this."
O'Casey added appointing the Southeast Oregon Resource Advisory Council in 2014 was an important part of public involvement. The council was made up of a wide variety of area people including grazing, energy and conservation interests, who made recommendations for management in the region.
Support for this reporting was provided by The Pew Charitable Trusts.
get more stories like this via email