PNS National Newscast

Audio Activation
"Siri, play the Public News Service (podcast)"
"Hey Google, play the Public News Service podcast"
"Alexa, play Public News Service podcast"
or "Alexa, what's my news flash?" once you set it up in the Alexa app

2020Talks

Audio Activation
"Siri, play the 2020Talks podcast"
"Hey Google, play the 2020Talks podcast"
"Alexa, play Two-Thousand-Twenty Talks podcast"
or "Alexa, what's my news flash?" once you set it up in the Alexa app

Newscasts

PNS Daily Newscast - August 4, 2020 


Despite Trump threat, NV Gov. Sisolak signs expanded vote-by-mail into law; Trump wants Treasury to get percentage of any TikTok deal.


2020Talks - August 4, 2020 


Trump threatens Nevada with litigation for passing a bill to send ballots to all registered voters. Plus, primaries today in Arizona, Kansas, Michigan, Missouri and Washington.

High Court Refuses to Hear PA's 'Free-Speech Bracelets' Case

March 12, 2014

EASTON, Pa. - Two Pennsylvania girls have won their legal fight to wear breast cancer awareness bracelets in school, after some considered them inappropriate.

The battle began in the Easton School District in 2010, when two middle-school students were suspended for wearing bracelets on Breast Cancer Awareness Day that read "I Heart Boobies."

This week, the U.S. Supreme Court refused to hear the district's appeal of a ruling from the 3rd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals that found the ban violated the girls' free speech rights.

"What the 3rd Circuit said is, 'Look, if these were plainly lewd, you could ban them,'" said Mary Catherine Roper, American Civil Liberties Union of Pennsylvania staff attorney. "'But they're not plainly lewd and they have an important social message.'"

Roper said the girls did get attention for wearing the bracelets in school, but not the kind teachers and administrators had feared.

"People would ask them what the bracelets were about," she said. "Other people would share their stories of families being touched by breast cancer. The things the girls did not experience were rude comments or something like that."

Roper added that the Supreme Court decision should give school officials reason to think twice about how students express themselves, and why.

"As it turns out, teenagers sometimes also have important things to say," she said "When they do, that's the sort of speech that should be encouraged, not discouraged."

The school had banned the bracelets the day before, when teachers complained about them. Attorneys for the school district felt that the appeals court ruling was ambiguous, giving reason for the Supreme Court to consider the case.

Tom Joseph, Public News Service - PA