LANSING, Mich. - Along with its natural beauty, Michigan is home to some stunning city skylines, and a new report says energy-efficiency upgrades could save businesses money while preserving the "Pure Michigan" way of life.
It's been one year since the Obama administration's Clean Power Plan to reduce carbon emissions was finalized. While critics continue to claim it will bankrupt the nation, growing evidence points to the contrary.
Dr. Marilyn Brown, a professor in the School of Public Policy of the Georgia Institute of Technology, said Michigan's commercial sector could realize average annual savings of more than $293 million on electric bills in 2030, and another $300 million in natural gas bills, if the Clean Power Plan was implemented, compared with doing nothing.
"Most electricity is used to heat and cool and light buildings," Brown said, "and about half of that building electricity goes to businesses, so it's a really important source for climate mitigation, CO2 emission reductions."
A previous study found significant potential savings for consumers as well, despite claims that electric rates would go up. The Clean Power Plan set the first-ever federal carbon pollution limits for power plants. Full implementation of the plan was halted in February after 20 states, including Michigan, filed lawsuits challenging the rules.
Many Michigan cities, including Grand Rapids, aren't waiting for the court battle to play out. They're already reaping the benefits of increased energy efficiency, as Haris Alibasic, the city's energy and sustainability director, explained.
"The city of Grand Rapids, over the past seven years, we made significant improvement to our energy efficiency in buildings," Alibasic said, "and as a result, we are able to see avoided costs as well as savings."
Brown said one big step all cities can take is what's known as energy benchmarking: requiring all buildings larger than 100,000 square feet to document and report their energy usage. She said it's a powerful way to let the market drive efficiency upgrades.
"That means that if a tenant wants to consider what the real cost of occupying a space in that building might be," Brown said, "they'd have some good sense of how efficient the office complex is."
The study found that considerable savings and carbon reduction could be achieved by switching to electric heating and cooling systems in commercial buildings, using new technology air-source pumps in place of natural gas heating, and rooftop air conditioning units.
The report is online at cepl.gatech.edu.
get more stories like this via email
Just as New York State prepares for its first offshore wind farm to come online, a new report predicted the state will not meet its climate goals.
The Public Power New York report showed, despite great progress, the state will not meet its 2030 clean-energy targets. In October, Gov. Kathy Hochul announced a multibillion-dollar investment in renewable energy projects which would accomplish 70% of the state's goal.
Patrick Robbins, coordinator of the New York Energy Democracy Alliance, described some of the factors at play.
"One answer is a kind of uneven marketplace for financial investment when you're looking at renewable energy," Robbins explained. "There was a number of contracts and leases that fell apart for utility-scale renewables, just in the last two months, here in New York."
He also cited supply chain issues and increased costs for construction materials. Some renewable energy developers canceled projects because their contracts were negotiated prior to the pandemic. But Robbins is confident New York can make up lost ground, and pointed out the New York Power Authority is taking advantage of Inflation Reduction Act funds for renewable energy projects.
While the pandemic may have slowed New York's progress on its climate goals, it is not the entire issue. Robbins emphasized there is more than enough blame to go around. He argued the state could have done plenty of things differently since the goals were set in the Climate Leadership and Protection Act.
"The support from the state itself has really been uneven at best," Robbins contended. "Especially, actually, at the time of the CLCPA's passage. When you're not talking about a strong and dependable state partner, there's only really so much you can do."
Over the next year, Robbins stressed he and other climate activists hope to educate legislators and the public about New York's climate goals and what more could be done to achieve them.
Though 2030 may not be the year the goals are met, Robbins is confident they are within reach. He said the timeline depends on Gov. Hochul and the New York Power Authority's board.
"I am confident that, if the governor and the NYPA board craft an ambitious implementation plan for 2025 and see that through, we will usher in a new era in New York's energy generation that can set a positive example for the country and the world," Robbins added.
Plenty of legislation has passed in recent years to ensure the state moves closer to its goals. However, lawmakers have said some bills like the New York HEAT Act failed due to competing priorities in the budget process.
Disclosure: The Sane Energy Project and Energy Democracy Alliance contribute to our fund for reporting on Climate Change/Air Quality, Energy Policy, Environmental Justice, and Social Justice. If you would like to help support news in the public interest,
click here.
get more stories like this via email
Utilities and government agencies in the U.S. are carrying out plans to transition to cleaner electricity sources. To avoid being left behind, rural communities, including in Minnesota, are leveraging federal resources to expand their power portfolios.
The topic was part of a recent congressional briefing hosted by the Rural Power Coalition.
Sen. Tina Smith, D-Minn., took part, saying investments from the Inflation Reduction Act provide grants and loans to rural electric co-ops, so they can purchase or develop renewable energy systems. There is also funding for municipal utilities and tribal governments.
"These voluntary, technology-neutral programs put rural electricity providers on the path to unleash clean energy for the communities that they serve in a way that works best for them," Smith explained.
Smith noted recent applications are likely to surpass available funds, underscoring strong demand from smaller communities to diversify energy sources. Rural electric co-ops have had a harder time competing with investor-owned utilities in the decarbonization movement, in part because of being locked into coal contracts. In Minnesota, co-ops serve roughly one-third of the state.
Gabriel Chan, associate professor of public policy at the University of Minnesota and co-director of the Electric Cooperative Innovation Center, spoke in the briefing. He said the extra federal support allows co-ops to scale up clean energy production while still managing their existing debt.
"This ensures that the energy transition can move at a rapid pace," Chan pointed out. "While also ensuring that the transition happens on an affordable and reliable path."
He suggested keeping costs lower for the energy transition in rural areas puts their local economies in a better position. According to the National Rural Electric Cooperative Association, such operations serve more than 90% of counties experiencing persistent poverty.
Disclosure: The Rural Power Coalition contributes to our fund for reporting on Budget Policy & Priorities, Energy Policy, Environment, and Rural/Farming Issues. If you would like to help support news in the public interest,
click here.
get more stories like this via email
Clean-energy advocates in Ohio and around the country say now is the time for the government to ensure the nation has the medium- and heavy-duty truck infrastructure needed to keep electric-powered trucks charged and driving across the country.
Trucks transported more than 11 billion tons of freight last year, spewing air pollutants and greenhouse gases along the way.
John Boesel - CEO of CALSTART, a clean-transportation nonprofit group - explained that the Environmental Protection Agency is considering rules to require commercial vehicle manufacturers to drastically curb emissions in the coming years.
But he said the agency should also figure out how to roll out national infrastructure to keep pace with the adoption of EV trucks.
"The Biden administration has a tremendous opportunity to really make progress," said Boesel, "in terms of supporting communities that have disproportionately been impacted by by diesel trucks and pollution."
The roadmap developed by CALSTART calls for building truck-charging stations in areas where industry is already concentrated, and then integrating hubs and corridors into an ever-expanding network - mostly along established supply-chain routes.
Critics say trucking companies and drivers have concerns about EV costs, mileage range, battery weight and safety, charging time and availability.
This year, Ohio Gov. Mike DeWine announced the future locations of 27 new electric vehicle charging stations that will be installed along Ohio interstates.
Boesel said the growth of e-commerce has led to skyrocketing emissions, as more people and businesses order products online that are delivered by truck.
He said addressing the impact of heavy-duty vehicle pollution could lower public health risks for drivers, communities and the planet.
"In the future, we can see a society where we have trucks rolling around with zero emission and zero noise," said Boesel, "truck drivers being much happier driving an electric truck."
According to the market research firm PWC, the nation's charging market will need to grow nearly tenfold to meet demand driven by an estimated 27 million EVs on the road by 2030.
get more stories like this via email