Congress Targets Updated BLM Land-Use Planning Rules
Tuesday, February 21, 2017
BOISE, Idaho – A coalition of groups across the West is concerned Congress could overturn the Bureau of Land Management's new land-use planning policies before Rep. Ryan Zinke of Montana is confirmed as U.S. Interior Secretary.
Last week, the U.S. House voted to repeal the Obama-era rule known as "Planning 2.0," under the Congressional Review Act (CRA). That leaves the fate of the rule in the hands of the Senate.
Rob Thornberry, Idaho field representative for the Theodore Roosevelt Conservation Partnership, says the new rules have a streamlined approach, bringing all concerned parties together to plan at the beginning of the process.
"If we throw out Planning 2.0, we get stuck with the 1983 rules that nobody liked, the ranchers don't like, the miners don't like, BLM doesn't like," he said. "It was an ineffective tool. It's led us to a litigious culture in Idaho, certainly across the West, and we can do better than that."
If the planning rules are repealed under the CRA, it could tie the hands of the next Interior Secretary. The CRA repeal prohibits the agency from issuing any rules that are "substantially the same" as previous rules without approval from Congress.
The goal of Planning 2.0 is to give the public and stakeholders a greater role in the BLM planning process, and at an earlier point. Rather than repealing the new rules now, Thornberry thinks it makes more sense to address any concerns about them with the new Interior Secretary.
"They're throwing the baby out with the bathwater," he added. "People want a two-for-one exchange on regulations, which I can understand, but this isn't that. This is about how they plan, and how they give people a voice in the process."
Earlier this month, the Western Governors' Association, which includes Idaho Gov. Butch Otter, sent a letter to Congress expressing concern over Planning 2.0, and asking the agency to revise it in collaboration with states. However, the rules and any potential revisions would be banished for good if Planning 2.0 is taken away under the CRA.
Support for this reporting was provided by The Pew Charitable Trusts.
get more stories like this via email
RICHMOND, Va. - As U.S. Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, D-N.Y., takes heat this week for attending a posh fundraiser in a dress that said "Tax the …
EAST TROY, Wis. - Wisconsin farmers are looking ahead to the fall harvest, and those who use cover crops face a deadline to sign up for a research …
SIOUX FALLS, S.D. - The pandemic is shining a new light on the burdens felt by family caregivers, and a bill in Congress would remove some of the …
TALLAHASSEE, Fla. - State Rep. Randy Fine, R-Palm Bay, is lashing out against the idea of Critical Race Theory, filing a bill to ban its use in all …
PORTLAND, Ore. - Wealthy Americans have a message for Congress: Tax us more. More than 200 high-income taxpayers and business owners have sent an …
ALBANY, N.Y. - As a U.S. House committee debates the Biden administration's "Build Back Better" Act, a letter from more than 200 wealthy Americans …
By Sonali Kolhatkar for Yes! Media. Broadcast version by Lily Bohlke for Commonwealth News Service reporting for the YES! Media-Public News Service …
MANCHESTER, N.H. - Three New Hampshire professors are among those who've signed a letter urging the United Nations General Assembly to adopt what's …