ALBUQUERQUE, N.M. -- Congress passed a bill last week that removed protections the Federal Communications Commission had in place to restrict what internet service providers can do with customers' information.

Senate Joint Resolution 34 is frustrating for consumer advocates, who see the law as an way for ISPs to invade users’ privacy by sharing their online behavior. Ed Mierzwinski, consumer program director at the New Mexico Public Interest Research Group, said even though providers have always tracked what customers do online, the problem now is what they'll be able to do with it.

"We're concerned that the telephone companies and cable companies - longtime gatekeepers, who have much more collection of information already - can now share and sell that information,” Mierzwinski said. "Congress did it in a way that means the FCC may not ever be able to protect you again."

He said Congress is specifically preventing similar protections from being reinstated in the future. Republicans who introduced the bill said the FCC regulations were an overreach that held back progress in online business. President Donald Trump has said he will sign the legislation.

Mierzwinski said with only a few, giant internet service providers in the marketplace, Congress is removing people's ability to choose whether to use one that sells personal data or not.

While websites such as Facebook, Google and Amazon have never denied that they use customer behavior for marketing, Mierzwinski said ISPs have far more information at their disposal to collect and sell. But, he added, there are ways to browse unseen by companies such as Comcast, Time Warner and AT&T.

"If you want to protect your communications on the Internet going forward, I think you're going to have to consider getting a virtual private network, using various privacy protections that most people have never heard of,” he said.

One of those protections is software known as "Tor," which relays online communications in a manner that cannot be tracked. Mierzwinski said options like this could become increasingly valuable as internet privacy erodes.


get more stories like this via email

BOISE, Idaho - Millions of members around the world, including some Idahoans, are observing International Credit Union Day today.

This year marks 73 years of International Credit Union Day. These not-for-profit financial institutions stretch across 118 countries.

Jon Maroni is the marketing director with Canopy Credit Union in the Northwest.

"International Credit Union Day, in general, is just really a day to celebrate our movement and the impact that credit unions have had," said Maroni. "Both for their members and then also, the communities that they serve."

More than 1.1 million Idahoans are credit union members. There are more than 120 million members nationwide.

To celebrate, credit union employees across the Northwest are volunteering for community and service projects.

Maroni said he sees credit unions as being especially beneficial in the early days of the pandemic, when the economy was in flux and many people weren't able to work.

"A lot of credit unions were offering things like, 'Hey, connect with us if you're needing to skip a couple of loan payments, or if you're needing to just work out an arrangement for payments on loans, or if your account's negative,' things like that," said Maroni. "Just really embracing the fact that our members own our credit unions."

International Credit Union Day is also when the institutions set their agendas for the coming years. The World Council of Credit Unions aims to digitize its organizations around the world in the next four years with its Challenge 2025 goal.

ALBANY, N.Y. -- AARP is among the groups urging Congress to pass a proposal to allow Medicare to negotiate lower prescription costs with drug companies, as part of the Build Back Better Act.

The average annual cost of prescription drugs increased 55% faster than the average income of New York residents between 2015 and 2019, according to AARP.

Americans pay on average three times as much for brand-name drugs compared to other countries.

Joe Stelling, associate director for advocacy at AARP New York, said it is time for change.

"There's no reason why Americans should pay the highest prescription drug prices in the world," Stelling asserted. "It's just wrong that many seniors are forced to choose between filling their prescriptions and paying rent, or buying groceries."

The Veterans Administration already negotiates prices with pharmaceutical companies. According to the Congressional Budget Office, the VA pays about half as much for brand-name drugs compared to the Medicare prescription drug benefit.

Stelling estimates people with Medicare 'Part D' plans could collectively save $117 billion over 10 years with price negotiations.

Bill Ferris, legislative representative for AARP New York, said many of his group's members age 65 or older are on Social Security and have limited incomes. He pointed out the issue with high drug prices isn't new, and can have serious health impacts.

"One of the worst things that happens is when someone can't afford their prescription drug, and they delay filling their prescription, or they don't take their prescription," Ferris observed.

Ferris added the group is working to partner with the Medicare Savings Program, which might allow lower deductibles and cover more prescriptions.

According to an AARP "Price Watch" report, the average older American takes four prescription drugs, often the result of a chronic health condition.

CARSON CITY, Nev. -- Twenty state Attorneys General, including Aaron Ford from Nevada, are slamming proposed new federal banking guidelines for not addressing what are known as "rent-a-bank" schemes.

The state leaders asked federal regulators for a crackdown on non-bank lenders that partner with real banks to make loans sold to the non-bank partner.

By using the bank's name on paperwork, the non-bank can claim the loan should not be subject to state regulations, including interest-rate caps.

Rebecca Borné, senior policy council at the Center for Responsible Lending, said the federal guidance should explicitly condemn rent-a-bank arrangements.

"Because the guidance is essentially silent on it, it definitely raises the question of, is it going to be read as permission for more banks to engage in these rent-a-bank schemes?" Borné pointed out.

Also Tuesday, a coalition of consumer and civil rights groups sent a letter to federal regulators calling for a crackdown on rent-a-bank partnerships.

In June, President Joe Biden eliminated a Trump-era "true lender" rule, saying it favored predatory lenders over consumers.

A report from the National Consumer Law Center said in Nevada, a company called Elevate offers loans under the "Rise" brand, with interest rates of 149%, in connection with FinWise Bank or Capital Community Bank. Elevate also offers "Elastic"-branded loans up to 109% effective APR, through Republic Bank and Trust.

Nevada passed a bill in 2019 limiting predatory lending practices and capping interest rates to about 40% for installment loans.

Borné noted loans with high rates can lead to an unending cycle of debt.

"These loans are designed to be unaffordable," Borné asserted. "Lenders succeed by causing borrowers to fail. Customers pay on these loans for years, often without reducing the principal."

The National Consumer Law Center also warned of a company known as Axcess Financial, working under the name "Check 'n Go." It offers loans with the brand-name "Xact," up to 199% APR, through an agreement with Capital Community Bank.