Unions Standing Strong in Face of Big Supreme Court Case
Monday, February 26, 2018
SEATTLE – The U.S. Supreme Court is hearing a case Monday that has big implications for unions.
In Janus v. American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees (AFSCME), justices will decide whether employees represented by public unions have to pay so-called fair share fees if they do not want to be members.
If the court sides with Mark Janus, an Illinois public employee, unions would still work on behalf of these employees in collective bargaining and other negotiations, but the employees wouldn't have to pay for that representation. It would deliver a big blow to part of unions' revenue stream.
But Karen Strickland, president of the American Federation of Teachers (AFT) of Washington, says it could be a wake-up call to unions and their members.
"We are doing the work, and if we do it effectively – to really engage our members in what the union is all about and how important organized labor is to their well-being on the job and in their communities and for their students and so on and so forth – then we can actually come out stronger on the other side," she states.
Briefs filed in support of Janus say he shouldn't have to pay union fees on First Amendment grounds.
Strickland notes that dues to AFT Washington are not used for political spending.
Union membership has declined nationwide in the past few decades, especially as more states become right-to-work states, meaning employees don't pay for representation.
However, membership in Washington state has actually grown by 84,000 since 2015, with the biggest gains among young people.
The public unions in the 22 states that are not right-to-work, including Washington, represent about 5 million workers.
Strickland says the attack on unions extends beyond this case and is so vigorous because the unions are effective at protecting and representing workers.
"Our members' salaries and benefits are better because they're in a union,” she stresses. “Injury and fatality rates are significantly lower when people have a union.
“The percentage of employees who actually have health care coverage is higher when people are in unions."
Strickland adds that wages are higher even for non-union members in cities where union representation is high.
This is the second in a two-part series on the effect of the Janus v. AFSCME Supreme Court case on Washington state's public unions.
get more stories like this via email
Groups working to curb climate change said a Supreme Court ruling limiting the ability of the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to control carbon …
Government labels on meat products that say "humane" or "raised in a stress-free environment" are meaningless, according to some animal-rights groups…
A new report found when high school students enroll in early college programs, it improves the chances they will go on to college after graduation…
As hurricane season kicks into full gear, Pennsylvania officials are reflecting on the impacts of Hurricane Agnes 50 years ago, and urging property …
Health and Wellness
Texas is home to one in 10 Americans of reproductive age, and mandated births due to the state's abortion ban will increase the number of maternal …
Community health centers are calling on state and federal lawmakers for added protections against drug manufactures for drastically cutting them out o…
The futures of tourism, wildlife and ranching in Mono County are now at the mercy of the Los Angeles Department of Water and Power - according to …
Coming off a string of controversial opinions, the U.S. Supreme Court has agreed to hear arguments in a case tied to oversight of federal elections…