Court Victory for Transgender Students
Wednesday, May 29, 2019
WASHINGTON - A decision by the U.S. Supreme Court is being hailed as a victory for transgender students in Pennsylvania and nationwide.
The nation's highest court on Tuesday said it won't hear the appeal of a case that upheld the Boyertown Area School District's policy of allowing transgender students to use restrooms that match their gender. The 2016 policy was challenged by a group of students who claimed the presence of transgender students in restrooms and locker rooms is a form of sexual harassment. That argument was rejected by a federal District Court and the Third Circuit Court of Appeals.
Mary Catherine Roper, deputy legal director of the ACLU of Pennsylvania, said the Supreme Court's decision allows that ruling to stand.
"What this means is that school districts do have the legal ability to protect transgender student rights," she said, "and we think, although it wasn't an issue in this case, they have the obligation to do that."
The appeals court said excluding transgender students from facilities other students use would increase the stigma and discrimination that transgender students already face.
Roper noted that allowing the appeals court ruling to stand should have important implications for other cases around the country in which the equal rights of transgender people are being challenged.
"The important principle from this case is that it doesn't hurt a cisgender person when you allow a transgender person to live according to their identity," she said.
Efforts to roll back transgender rights on the federal level also are being challenged.
The Trump administration wants to ban transgender people from military service, allow doctors to refuse to treat transgender patients, and allow discrimination in homeless shelters. Roper said Tuesday's Supreme Court decision sends a powerful message.
"Whatever the Trump administration says about federal policy," she said, "they can't stop a school district from doing the right thing."
She added that because the district court ruling was based on a preliminary record, the plaintiffs still can go back to that court and ask for a full trial.
More information is online at aclu.org.
get more stories like this via email
In the wake of historic summer floods in the Midwest and Appalachia, there are calls for a new national plan to reduce risks from disasters. The …
Small businesses that suffered damage or destruction from the recent historic flooding in Eastern Kentucky can get one-on-one assistance as they try t…
The Inflation Reduction Act, newly passed by the U.S. Senate, allocates $369 Billion to fight climate change, and appropriates funds specifically for …
Sweeping legislation approved by Congress is designed to address a range of issues, including climate change and deficit reductions. Other components …
By Linda Burstyn for Ms. Magazine Broadcast version by Roz Brown for New Mexico News Connection/Public News Service Bad Business: Anti-abortion …
Opening up Pennsylvania's primary elections to voters who aren't registered either as Democrats or Republicans is the topic of a State House of Repres…
August is National Black Business Month, and this year, for Black-owned companies in Pennsylvania that have managed to survive through the pandemic…
On August 27, members of the public will have a rare opportunity to visit the historic Padlock Ranch first developed for livestock in 1867, now …