Court Victory for Transgender Students
Wednesday, May 29, 2019
WASHINGTON - A decision by the U.S. Supreme Court is being hailed as a victory for transgender students in Pennsylvania and nationwide.
The nation's highest court on Tuesday said it won't hear the appeal of a case that upheld the Boyertown Area School District's policy of allowing transgender students to use restrooms that match their gender. The 2016 policy was challenged by a group of students who claimed the presence of transgender students in restrooms and locker rooms is a form of sexual harassment. That argument was rejected by a federal District Court and the Third Circuit Court of Appeals.
Mary Catherine Roper, deputy legal director of the ACLU of Pennsylvania, said the Supreme Court's decision allows that ruling to stand.
"What this means is that school districts do have the legal ability to protect transgender student rights," she said, "and we think, although it wasn't an issue in this case, they have the obligation to do that."
The appeals court said excluding transgender students from facilities other students use would increase the stigma and discrimination that transgender students already face.
Roper noted that allowing the appeals court ruling to stand should have important implications for other cases around the country in which the equal rights of transgender people are being challenged.
"The important principle from this case is that it doesn't hurt a cisgender person when you allow a transgender person to live according to their identity," she said.
Efforts to roll back transgender rights on the federal level also are being challenged.
The Trump administration wants to ban transgender people from military service, allow doctors to refuse to treat transgender patients, and allow discrimination in homeless shelters. Roper said Tuesday's Supreme Court decision sends a powerful message.
"Whatever the Trump administration says about federal policy," she said, "they can't stop a school district from doing the right thing."
She added that because the district court ruling was based on a preliminary record, the plaintiffs still can go back to that court and ask for a full trial.
More information is online at aclu.org.
get more stories like this via email
A wave of new Arizona voters in the 2020 election changed the normally conservative state to one where progressive candidates and ideas have a fightin…
The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers plans to use federal funds for a project to help keep invasive carp out of the Great Lakes. It is proposing using …
Healthcare workers at an Oregon hospital have achieved what they say is a "win" after several strikes in recent months. Nearly 300 workers and …
As Pennsylvania continues to grow its solar-energy capacity, a new report found the roofs of big-box stores present a big opportunity to increase …
If Iowa wants to create healthier outcomes for its residents, advocates say there are steps policymakers can take right now to make it happen…
North Dakota has returned a significant portion of the rental assistance provided by the federal government in the pandemic, and groups working …
Nearly 1,200 Hoosiers are about to have some of their student-loan debt forgiven, as part of a multistate settlement with the student-loan-servicing …
After a defeat on Wednesday, Democrats in the U.S. Senate say they'll keep trying to pass voting-rights legislation, and one Wisconsin group wants …