PARADISE, Mich. -- Rural educators say the funding for broadband in the bipartisan infrastructure package signed into law last month is critical for their communities.
While many say the problem has existed for decades, the increased need for high-speed internet for virtual work and learning during the pandemic put an added spotlight on the issue.
Tom McKee, superintendent and principal of Whitefish Township Community Schools in the Upper Peninsula, said their school had to supply Wi-Fi for many of their teachers and students. But he added some families in his district live far enough off the main road, even with hotspots and satellite internet were not reliable.
"So until we start thinking of broadband access as not just another utility but as something that should be as common as your garbage getting picked up, I think we're going to continue to see this in rural areas," McKee asserted.
The infrastructure bill included $65 billion for improving broadband nationwide, much specifically targeted at rural and tribal areas.
According to the FCC, 68% of people living in rural areas do not have access to broadband. McKee added rural broadband can be expensive, and many families living paycheck to paycheck cannot afford it.
In addition to work and school, a lack of broadband can mean lack of access to health specialists via telemedicine.
"The passing of this bill is very important for our kids in Michigan, all of our kids, not just the ones that live in the urban or suburban areas," McKee noted. "We don't want our 20% that live in rural areas to be left behind."
The U.S. ranks 27th in the world for access to high-speed internet, according to the consulting firm Kepios, and ranks 14th in the world for the speed of its mobile and broadband internet connections, according to speedtest.net.
get more stories like this via email
Ballots are due for Oregon's primary election on Tuesday, and one key issue for voters is the rights of workers who grow the state's food. Farmworkers were considered essential during the pandemic, but still are fighting for better conditions.
Aldo Solano, strategic partnerships manager for Oregon Food Bank, said farmworkers already were more likely to experience hunger, and the pandemic made it worse.
"Farmworkers are some of the lowest-paid workers in Oregon, earning less than $20,000 a year on average," Solano observed. "We understand at Oregon Food Bank that, in order to be able to really eliminate hunger at its root causes, we need to be fighting and working to improve the different systems that perpetuate poverty and that create conditions for folks to be food insecure."
Solano pointed out Oregon's food system is anchored by nearly 175,000 migrant and seasonal farmworkers.
Although pay is low for Oregon farmworkers, they achieved a victory in this year's legislative session. Lawmakers passed a bill securing overtime pay for those who work more than 40 hours a week.
Solano noted it was a major focus for Oregon Food Bank during the session.
"When we asked the question of how do we eliminate hunger, the root causes of hunger, this was one of the priority pieces of legislation that some of our partners were working on that we were able to get behind and support in different ways," Solano recalled.
He added organizations like the farmworkers' rights group Pineros y Campesinos Unidos del Noroeste (PCUN) were instrumental in getting the bill passed.
Oregon Food Bank, a nonpartisan nonprofit, surveyed candidates for governor about food
insecurity. The responses are posted on its website and include a question about conditions for farmworkers.
Solano emphasized it will say a lot about the candidates.
"It's important to take a hard look at how elected officials or the folks who are running for office are speaking about, I think, a community that's so vital to the state and our communities who are at the beginning of our food chain," Solano contended.
The deadline to vote is Tuesday. Drop sites for ballots will be open until 8 p.m.
Disclosure: Oregon Food Bank contributes to our fund for reporting on Hunger/Food/Nutrition Issues. If you would like to help support news in the public interest,
click here.
get more stories like this via email
Small Montana meat processors are on the front lines against the large companies that control the industry. Funding from the American Rescue Plan is helping these processors compete.
$7.8 million were secured for 30 Montana businesses from the COVID relief legislation. That includes $450,000 for Hamilton Packing Company in the Bitterroot Valley.
Jason Schlange is owner of the business, which has been around since 1969.
"All of our stuff here," said Schlange, "it's a little bit older so we're going to be to get it up to snuff and do a little bit of expanding in the process so we have a little bit more room for cooler and freezer storage, which is important. And we'll be able to upgrade our retail facility, so have a little bit more to offer."
Sen. Jon Tester - D-MT - led efforts to secure funds for small meat processors in Montana.
He says consolidation among the country's four big meat processors - which own the vast majority of the market - is driving meat processors, ranchers and other small businesses to close.
Schlange said the big four - Cargill, Tyson Foods, JBS and National Beef Packing - can have an outsized impact on the market when they choose to.
"So if they kind of try and put their thumb on something," said Schlange, "I think these funds are going to help a lot of smaller meat processors like myself to be able to take care of their local communities better."
Schlange said supply-chain issues from the pandemic have highlighted the importance of local meat processors to be able to continue serving communities, even as meat was in short supply at larger stores.
get more stories like this via email
North Dakota ranchers are still assessing their losses from the spring snowstorms. They are being urged to tap into federal relief, and some are calling for better payouts.
Pat Becker, a rancher from Sioux County, said lost at least 50 calves and expects the number to increase. Becker pointed out he and his workers did their best to protect the herds, but the wind and snow proved to be overwhelming.
"That big group of cows, you know, you can't put 'em inside; we don't have facilities," Becker explained. "We got them bedded down, and then the wind switches, then they want to drift away. And that's when we lost quite a few calves."
The federal government's Livestock Indemnity Program can help recover some losses. Payments are equal to 75% of the average fair market value for the animals.
Becker noted while it softens the blow, a new payment structure means he's getting $175 for smaller calves, far below the going rate. Sen. Kevin Cramer, R-N.D., has requested an adjustment in payment levels.
The pain felt from a wet and snowy spring follows last year's severe drought. Becker, a member of the North Dakota Farmers Union, acknowledged the precipitation has helped, but the magnitude of events makes it harder to keep moving forward.
"Your plan is to build a ranch for your children," Becker remarked. "And it's just tough because, you know, since 2015, we've been lucky just to break even, you know, and it's really a struggle."
He suggested proper support for weather disasters would create more stability for independent producers. In turn, Becker added it can make farming more attractive to younger generations.
In the meantime, affected producers can connect with their Farm Service Agency office to see if their losses meet the aid threshold. Documentation must be reported within 30 days of a livestock loss.
Disclosure: The North Dakota Farmers Union contributes to our fund for reporting on Rural/Farming Issues. If you would like to help support news in the public interest,
click here.
get more stories like this via email