La representante republicana de Arizona, Debbie Lesko, anunció recientemente que no buscará la reelección el próximo año. En un comunicado, Lesko dijo que viajar al Capitolio ha sido difícil y que "D.C. está destrozado". Ella dice que "es difícil hacer algo". La Profesora de Ciencias Políticas de la Universidad de Temple, Robin Kolodny, dice que son tiempos difíciles no sólo para los políticos sino también para los partidos políticos. Explica además que no le gusta ver que ninguna de las partes sea lo que llama "demasiado disfuncional".

"Entonces resta importancia al mensaje de las elecciones generales y cuál será el liderazgo, pero esta es una herida autoinfligida en este momento," insistió Kolodny.

Mientras los republicanos de la Cámara de Representantes continúan luchando por elegir un nuevo presidente, una nueva encuesta muestra que los estadounidenses culpan cada vez más a los republicanos sobre los demócratas por la disfunción en el Capitolio. Dos tercios de las casi 1.700 personas encuestadas dicen que los republicanos conservadores merecen parte de la culpa por el actual estancamiento en Washington.

John Green, profesor de la Universidad de Akron, menciona que las elecciones de 2020 generaron muchas innovaciones organizativas y tecnológicas en la forma en que se llevan a cabo las elecciones. Sospecha que, de cara a 2024, ciertos aspectos de cómo se ejecutan y financian las campañas volverán a las prácticas anteriores a la pandemia, pero no todos. Dice que las campañas y la recaudación de fondos en línea ya eran una tendencia en expansión, que creció dramáticamente debido a la emergencia de salud pública.

"No creo que vaya a volver a ser como era antes, en parte porque son herramientas útiles, pero la gente tuvo una especie de experimento forzado sobre cómo usarlas y descubrieron que muchas de estas técnicas funcionan muy bien," analizó también Green.

Los expertos añaden que está claro que los políticos de ambos partidos están aprovechando en gran medida los espacios en línea no sólo para hacer campaña sino también para recaudar fondos para las próximas elecciones.

Apoyo para esta historia fue proporcionado por la Carnegie Corporation of New York


get more stories like this via email

Recent Supreme Court rulings on air pollution are affecting Virginia and the nation.

Climate advocates said the court overstepped its bounds in ruling the Environmental Protection Agency's Good Neighbor Rule was improperly enacted and repealing the so-called "Chevron deference." Without it, judges have to rule on ambiguous regulatory laws with no agency expertise.

Craig Segall, vice president of the advocacy group Evergreen Action, said the court is diminishing the capacity of Virginia's federal climate partners like the EPA.

"By creating room to attack, for instance, carbon standards for power plants federally, that Virginia might want to implement," Segall outlined. "Or by making it harder for U.S. EPA to move us toward electric vehicles that would create jobs in Virginia and that would, you know, clean up the air, especially in Northern Virginia where it's so congested."

He added it creates an opportunity for states to lead on climate action. But partisan opinions on climate change vary across the country. In Virginia, it means mixed efforts from utility companies and lawmakers. Dominion Energy is developing offshore wind, but it is also pressing on with a natural gas plant residents vehemently oppose.

The rulings, coupled with decisions on presidential immunity and what constitutes bribery have eroded the Supreme Court's perception of impartiality. Polls show most Americans across party lines feel the Court puts political ideology first.

Quentin Scott, federal policy director for the Chesapeake Climate Action Network, said it opens the floodgates to government corruption.

"We can't have this blatant, open corruption or it will diminish our effectiveness of government and enforcement of some very important rules related to pollution," Scott asserted.

He stressed climate action will be a top ballot priority along with preserving democracy. Some of his group's top issues for the next presidency will be improving grid interconnection of clean energy projects and approving certain reforms for the Supreme Court.

Vice President Kamala Harris, now the presumptive Democratic nominee for president, delivered a powerful message in Indianapolis.

Speaking at a Zeta Phi Beta Sorority event, just days after President Joe Biden dropped out of the race and endorsed her candidacy, Harris emphasized her dedication to affordable healthcare, student debt relief, and gun control measures, including universal background checks and an assault weapons ban.

She also hammered home that, if she is elected president, she would restore a woman's right to choose an abortion.

"When I am President of the United States and when Congress passes a law to restore those freedoms, I will sign it into law," Harris said. "We are not playing around."

Harris expressed her belief that the current administration has made progress toward a better future by implementing such initiatives as capping insulin prices for more affordable healthcare, passing the Child Tax Credit, and forgiving student loan debt for millions of Americans.

GOP Vice-Presidential nominee J.D. Vance was also in Indiana Wednesday. He spoke at a private event in Ft. Wayne.

Criticizing Project 2025, a conservative plan drafted by the Heritage Foundation, Harris warned it would take the country backward in the areas of medical freedom and education.

"This represents an outright attack on our children, our family, and our future. These extremists want to take us back, but we are not going back. We are not going back," she said.

Harris called for unity in defending freedom and stated there are two different visions for the country. Her vision, she said, looks to the future; the other, she said, looks to the past. Harris urged the community to mobilize and vote, stressing the significance of this moment in shaping the nation's future.


get more stories like this via email

A sweeping conservative plan to shape a possible second Donald Trump presidency is making headlines, even as the GOP candidate claims to know little about it.

"Project 2025" from the conservative Heritage Foundation includes standard conservative ideas, such as slashing regulations, but also firing thousands of civil servants, dismantling the Department of Education and giving more power to the states.

David Nevins, co-publisher of The Fulcrum and co-founder of the Bridge Alliance, a network of organizations working to promote healthy self-governance, has enlisted experts to share their thoughts on each of Project 2025's 30 sections.

"The cross-partisan approach that we believe in is, in some cases, the federal government can do certain things more effectively - in some cases not as effectively - and that's the discussion we need to have as a nation," Nevins said.

Alarming to New Mexico conservationists, Project 2025 proposes slashing federal money for research and investment in renewable energy, and replacing carbon-reduction goals with efforts to increase energy production and energy security.

Nevins believes many on the far right want to "turn back the clock" and erase societal changes that have occurred in the last 20 to 30 years. He said people can be afraid of change - especially when things are moving fast - but thinks Project 2025 represents a lack of open-mindedness rather than seeking common ground to take democracy to its next level.

"The reality of America is that we are a diverse country, in terms of racial, ethnic, sexual preferences, religion - that is the reality. And if we're going to live into the pluralistic dream of our founding fathers and mothers, we have to learn to make that work," he explained.

While Trump has denied knowing much about Project 2025, nearly two-thirds of the authors behind the plan served in his former administration.


get more stories like this via email