The U.S. Justice Department has issued a ruling against a Livingston, Montana, landlord for discriminating against a tenant. The consent decree requires the defendant to complete training on discrimination in housing and awards the complainant $25,000.

A tenant of a Livingston apartment complex alleged Yellowstone Apartments landlord Dana Christian discriminated against her after the tenant asked Christian to stop making advances toward her daughter who was visiting her mother from Russia. The complaint alleged Christian made life increasingly difficult for the tenant after the complaint, even though she had lived there for years with no issues. The Justice Department ordered Christian to pay $25,000 to compensate her for moving costs, time and emotional hardship.

Pam Bean, executive director of the nonprofit Montana Fair Housing, said the ruling sets a precedent for equal housing opportunity.

"When issues arise such as did with this complainant, there's an avenue to address those, hopefully prior to the filing of complaints," Bean explained.

The federal court ruling also requires Christian to undergo training on what constitutes housing discrimination and post Montana's fair housing guidelines on the properties he manages.

Bean called the ruling a win for renters across Montana, who sometimes feel like they do not have the power to fight landlord discrimination cases for fear of the same type of retribution laid out in the Christian case.

"Providing housing providers the message that this behavior is intolerable and is illegal," Bean added.

Christian has not responded to requests for comment.

Virginia has a housing shortage of more than 200,000 units, and one legislative effort backed by a coalition of faith-based groups is trying to fill that gap. A bill introduced in the General Assembly would allow local governments to create a streamlined process for faith groups and other property-tax-exempt nonprofits to build affordable housing.

Sheila Herlihy Hennessee, director of faith organizing for the Virginia Interfaith Center for Public Policy, said congregations run into many different roadblocks when trying to build housing on their land.

"Congregations don't do this every day. A developer might do three or four big housing projects per year. A faith community might do one in a century. This is not their bread and butter, so there's a big learning curve with figuring out how to make that happen," she said.

She added that other issues include resistance from neighbors to increasing population density - and zoning laws across the state that are mostly geared toward single-family housing, and said working around those zoning laws can be arduous and time consuming.

A report by Housing-Forward Virginia and the Interfaith Center finds faith-based organizations own a substantial amount of land - more than 74,000 - in the Commonwealth. That's double the size of Richmond.

Herlihy Hennessee, who also co-authored the report, said the bill would provide the same, streamlined process now used to build affordable housing to other nonprofits.

"So, this very explicitly says, 'Yes, localities, you do have the authority to make the process easier for faith communities. Yes, localities, you can cut down on the NIMBY-ism. Yes, you can make this cost less money and move faster," she explained.

The legislation would also create a pilot program, where faith communities can apply for funds to cover pre-development costs, such as feasibility studies, site plans, architects and more.


get more stories like this via email

People are increasingly moving into the wildland-urban interface areas, where human development meets wild vegetation, like forests, according to a University of Nevada-Las Vegas expert.

Such landscapes are also notorious for wildfires.

Nicholas Irwin, associate professor of economics at the university, said it is the fastest-growing land use type in the West, which has helped to almost double the number of housing units since 1990.

How do the devastating wildfires in Los Angeles County fit into the picture? Irwin said while wildfires temporarily reduce development, they do not stop it entirely.

"As people start to rebuild, it is going to sort of recede into the background," Irwin pointed out. "The wildfire risk, the risk of building in these areas; people are going to be less concerned about it, which is partly founded in science because after the fires are extinguished and everything, the Pacific Palisades area will not re-catch fire for some time because the fuel load is no longer there."

Irwin and fellow researchers have found if fire hits an area, there is a lull in development for about five years. He argued while insurance companies do a good job thinking about the risks associated with some natural disasters, wildfires are not among them. He stated as a whole, the country is in an "infancy stage" when it comes to modeling wildfire risk, which he wants to see change.

Irwin pointed out in any given year, about 70% to 80% of new residents of Southern Nevada are coming from Southern California. He contended the latest wildfires may lead even more people to relocate and consider setting roots somewhere else.

"Las Vegas is really close and I can see a lot of folks moving here, at least temporarily, which is going to put a lot of pressure on our rental market," Irwin projected. "I could even see some folks moving here for a few years as they start the rebuilding process. We're not just talking about people losing their houses, we're talking about people losing their jobs potentially, their kids losing their schools, and I could see them wanting just sort of to reset."

Irwin emphasized he and others will continue to track the data. He added research shows the median individual who moves from out of state is about 15% wealthier than an in-state Nevada resident, which means they are better able to compete in the housing market.

As urban homelessness and drug use grab the spotlight, rural areas such as Branson are left in the shadows, with critical needs going unmet. But local community organizations are stepping up to provide much-needed support.

Branson has a growing crisis where substance use and homelessness intersect, with about 1,500 people, mostly those who are working but still considered low-income, living in extended-stay motels. An estimated 20% of the population is homeless, and motel living heightens the risk of substance-use and mental-health issues.

Marietta Hagan, project coordinator, Population Health Department with Cox Health, said there are the challenges to addressing these issues in rural areas.

"Lack of transportation in rural areas, lack of that financial and other resources. Branson is considered a rural area, even though we get 9 million visitors a year - we only have a population of 12,000 and the services to support those," she said.

Also, rural areas often have fewer homeless shelters, making it harder for people to find emergency housing or long-term support. Hagan said the good news is, people who have recovered from drug use and homelessness are working together to help those still struggling.

Hagan said it's almost like a multiplying factor - and once a person starts to struggle with issues stemming from poverty, especially in rural areas, it increases their risk of struggling with other issues such as drug use and homelessness - and this leads to stigmas and a lack of support.

"If you live in a small town that has 300 people, and you are labeled as a drug user, you're often ostracized from your community and you're not given that social support and that community that you can turn to maybe when you're struggling with something," she continued.

Between 2022 and 2023, Missouri saw a 12% increase in homelessness and a 24% rise in unsheltered homelessness.


get more stories like this via email