Clean water advocates in Maine are applauding the Environmental Protection Agency's new rule on lead pipe removals but warned drinking water in schools remains at risk.

The EPA set a 10-year deadline for most utilities to replace lead service lines but omitted requirements for schools to replace any fountains or plumbing with lead components.

John Rumpler, clean water director for the Environment America Research and Policy Center, said it is up to school superintendents and legislators to ensure students' water is safe.

"This final rule now dispels the illusion that the federal government is going to come and do the clean water homework for the state of Maine," Rumpler pointed out.

Rumpler argued Maine should follow Michigan's lead in requiring all schools to install filters certified to remove lead on all taps used for drinking or cooking. A recent report gave Maine a grade of "D" for its efforts to reduce exposure to lead in K-12 schools.

Several decades after the dangers of lead pipes were established, more than nine million pipes remain in use. The toxic metal is particularly dangerous for children and can lead to brain or nervous system damage, delayed development and behavioral problems. Rumpler added the EPA missed an opportunity to better protect students but a growing number of states and cities are requiring lead filtration systems themselves.

"If you're a school district, consider doing what Philadelphia, San Diego, Detroit, Milwaukee and so many other school districts are doing voluntarily to get the lead out and ensure safe drinking water for kids," Rumpler urged.

To help rural towns and cities comply with the new rule, the EPA is making an additional $3 billion available through the Bipartisan Infrastructure Law. The measure initially provided $15 billion to help cities replace their lead pipes, but government officials estimate the total cost will be several times higher.


get more stories like this via email

Mother's Day is fast approaching and an Arizona mom wants women of all ages to make sure they are prioritizing their heart health.

Nearly 45% of women age 20 and older are living with some form of heart disease and do not know it.

Sharla Fisher was in her late 30s when she received her first pacemaker. She said she always lived an active and healthy lifestyle but would experience occasional blackouts. It was not until she sought medical attention experts determined she had an abnormally low heart rate and blood pressure and was later diagnosed with neurocardiogenic syncope, also known as vasovagal syncope.

"It is not a fatal condition by any means," Fisher explained. "But what becomes fatal is this happened to me while I was driving with my children on the freeway. This has happened to me when I'm flying cross-country, in a cab in the middle of a city I don't know at one o'clock in the morning."

Fisher added in talking with her doctor, they determined a pacemaker would help regulate her cardiovascular system. Fisher shares her story to inspire other women to take heart health seriously. This year's American Heart Association Go Red for Women Luncheon will celebrate women like Fisher and share vital information to keep women healthy. The event will be on May 8 at the Westin Kierland Resort and Spa in Scottsdale.

Fisher pointed out after receiving her pacemaker, things still did not feel right. She wound up in the emergency room while traveling and was diagnosed with cardiac tamponade, which is when there is excess fluid in the sac surrounding the heart. Doctors informed her she would need open-heart surgery, prompting Fisher to call her children and say goodbye.

"Because I didn't know how we would make it out of this procedure, and, like I said, my organs had already started shutting down," Fisher recounted. "Obviously I am here, so there is a good story that comes out of all of this, but it was then that it really opened my eyes to women and heart disease."

Megan Stuff is this year's Phoenix Go Red for Women chair and said she has been having discussions about heart health with her young daughters who are 8 and 12 years old.

"We have to start these discussions so that we really can break some of those statistics," Stuff stressed. "That is my goal for the luncheon is to just bring awareness and advocacy for cardiovascular disease in women and just start the conversation as early as possible."

Many residents of West Virginia are at risk of losing health care under a federal proposal to cut Medicaid funding by $880 billion.

Sen. Jim Justice, R-W.Va., and Sen. Shelley Moore Capito, R-W.Va., voted for the cuts.

Ellen Allen, executive director of West Virginians for Affordable Healthcare, said more than 500,000 Mountain State residents rely on Medicaid for health coverage.

"We've seen no interest in our legislators trying to make up the difference so they can keep health care intact for over a half a million West Virginians," Allen pointed out.

Allen added other states are also preparing for potential cuts and looking for solutions to fill in the gaps. More than 200,000 West Virginians lost Medicaid coverage after the end of pandemic era continuous coverage rules.

Allen explained 72,000 residents in skilled nursing facilities need Medicaid to pay for housing and care. She believes some facilities will shut down when faced with budget cuts.

"These are people who couldn't afford long-term care and policies," Allen explained. "Their families don't have the resources to support them. So what are you going to do with 72,000 people in skilled nursing facilities when Medicaid is not there to support it?"

State-supported home care for people with disabilities could also be at risk. According to the National Rural Health Association, slightly under half of the nation's rural hospitals are operating at a loss. Cuts to Medicaid would likely mean more rural hospital closures statewide.

The Alaska branch of the American Heart Association is helping save lives by teaching the use of cardiopulmonary resuscitation and automated external defibrillators in rural communities.

In a medical emergency, such as a heart attack, time and distance can be a formidable obstacle in rural Alaska for getting a patient to a hospital. The association said only about 10% of people who suffer a cardiac arrest outside a hospital will survive but access to CPR or a defibrillator can triple those odds.

Kristin George, executive director of the American Heart Association of Alaska, said it is all about keeping the blood flowing.

"The benefit of having CPR and AED education is restarting the heart," George explained. "If we can keep the blood flowing to the heart, then we're not losing any of the parts we need. The reason we do the education is to continue to keep that heart beating."

George noted by 2030, the association plans to visit more than 220 rural Alaskan villages. Each visit will include a hands-only CPR and AED skills session led by a LifeMed Alaska expert. Each town will get a CPR Anytime Training Kit, so residents can practice their skills and teach others.

George pointed out the goal is to increase the number of residents in Alaska's rural communities trained to provide chest compressions or apply an external defibrillator to restart a heart. She emphasized many remote villages in Alaska are detached from the state's road system, meaning it can take a long time for medical help to arrive.

"Any village that's out on the coast or anything like that is going to be pretty much unable to get there without a plane," George observed. "Or if you wanted to take the longest trek of your life and do it sled dog or by snow machine."

George added the Association has set a goal of doubling the survival rate from cardiac arrests in Alaska by 2030. The Foss Family Foundation and LifeMed Alaska are sponsoring the rural Alaska effort.