A majority of adults in Colorado and across the U.S. say they are anxious about this year's presidential election, according to a recent poll.
Election experts are encouraging voters to be patient during a process that begins - but does not end - on November 5.
Celina Stewart, CEO of the League of Women Voters, said that patience could be tested as early as Election Day, with long lines for in-person voting.
"What we are seeing," said Stewart, "depending on the jurisdiction - it could be 15 minutes, it could be 30 minutes or longer to vote - just based on how many people are turning out. So, be prepared for that."
Voters should also be prepared to wait for election results to become official. Coloradans have had the option to vote early - by mail, in-person, or at a ballot drop box - since Oct. 21.
But anyone standing in line when the polls close still gets to vote, which can push back initial counts.
And it can take up to three weeks for ballots from overseas military personnel to be counted and certified.
Tammy Patrick, executive director of the National Association of Election Officials, said all Americans should be skeptical of any candidate who claims victory before all votes are counted - especially in close races.
"Everyone wants the results to be in as quickly as possible," said Patrick. "But it's important to realize that on election night, those are projected winners. We do not have official results until much later."
Experts say voters can be confident that they will be able to safely cast their ballot, and that it will be counted.
But there are concerns about threats to voting officials, and potential violence leading up to a congressional Electoral College tally on Jan. 6.
Stewart emphasized that no one can legally keep you from voting.
"In a worst case scenario," said Stewart, "if something happens, if there is some obstacle to you being able to cast your ballot - there's a voter hotline, 1-866-OurVote (1-866-687-8683)."
get more stories like this via email
Indiana lawmakers are advancing a measure focused on parental rights.
Senate Bill 143 has passed the Senate Judiciary Committee with a 9-2 vote.
Sen. Liz Brown, R-Fort Wayne, chair of the Judiciary Committee, authored the bill. She said it aims to prohibit government entities from withholding information from parents about their children or denying parental access to such information. Brown noted the bill allows parents to take legal action for violations.
"We don't have any bill currently in the state of Indiana protecting parents' rights or delineating them," Brown pointed out. "I certainly appreciate all the voices that we've probably all heard on this bill. And I really appreciate everyone's patience with trying to get this right."
Critics, including the ACLU, warn the bill could force educators to disclose sensitive information, potentially harming LGBTQ+ students. The bill sparked significant debate, with supporters highlighting cases where parents felt excluded by state agencies or schools.
Sen. Rodney Pol, D-Michigan City, who voted against the bill, expressed doubts about its constitutionality, citing children's privacy rights.
"I feel like this bill is very, very broad and I feel like it is going to have a chilling effect," Pol explained. "My concern here is that in the intent of trying to protect children, we're going to ultimately put certain children in danger."
While parental rights legislation is part of a national trend -- 62 similar bills appeared in 24 states in 2023 -- Hoosiers remain divided on its effects. Some parents support transparency, while others caution against blanket policies which may not account for older children's privacy needs. The bill now heads to the full Senate for further debate.
get more stories like this via email
A new poll shows Vice President Kamala Harris' support for Israel's war in Gaza may have cost her the 2024 presidential election.
Nearly 30% of the 19 million voters who backed President Joe Biden in 2020, but chose to stay home in 2024, said Palestine was the reason.
University of New Hampshire PhD student Stephanie Black said she couldn't support Harris' complacency in genocide, so she voted third party.
"We are exhausted of a government that is not listening to student protesters," said Black, "that is not listening to international activism groups - the evidence that they are presenting."
Harris won New Hampshire, but in states that swung from blue to red in 2024, 20% of Biden supporters did not vote due to Gaza.
Black called the ceasefire deal between Israel and Hamas "a step in the right direction," but said it's important that enough aid now reaches the Palestinian people to recover and rebuild.
Prior to Biden withdrawing from the race, several progressive groups warned he could lose millions of young voters unless he cut off U.S. military support for Israel.
Harris made it clear she would not break from Biden's policies.
UNH PhD candidate Sebastian Rowan said the protest vote should not be blamed for Harris' loss, but rather the Democrats' failure to deliver for working people.
"The Democratic Party, in addition to continuing to send billions of dollars to Israel, wasn't offering anything meaningful for the working class," said Rowan. "Many people felt that we were being gaslighted into believing that the economy is actually great."
Twenty-four percent of non-voters who previously backed Biden cited the economy as the reason they chose not to vote last year.
Rowan said his protest vote was in no way a sign of support for President-elect Donald Trump.
He said students will continue to organize on campus and press school officials to divest from companies, which profit from the war in Gaza.
Support for this reporting was provided by Carnegie Corporation of New York.
get more stories like this via email
A group of University of Pennsylvania students got up close and personal with Keystone State voters recently as they studied solutions to bridging the ideological divide.
Students with Penn's Political Empathy Lab traveled across the state last summer and talked with people at parks, libraries and county fairs. The goal was to listen to Pennsylvanians as they discussed the issues in the 2024 campaign.
Lia Howard, professor of political science at the university and director of the lab, said the students emphasized using critical listening skills to understand the voters better.
"Democratic listening is one of the most important and undervalued things that are happening right now," Howard contended. "Because we're just so inundated by talk, expression, and we don't get enough time to practice listening to another human being."
Howard pointed out the students recorded 45 hours of audio during their sessions, producing a podcast series and presenting what they learned on and off campus. Another statewide tour is scheduled for this spring, and Howard added she will eventually publish the students' findings.
Howard noted the lab was formed to put into direct practice some of the theoretical concepts her students study and apply them to Pennsylvania during the 2024 election.
"We weren't trying to do polling or necessarily canvassing, though both are really important and I'm all for both," Howard explained. "That wasn't our role. It was really to think about what we were bringing and how we could connect."
The students traveled more than 2,500 miles across the state and learned about each city or town before engaging the voters. Howard emphasized the students found showing empathy as they listened often drew a higher degree of candor and openness in the responses they received.
"Empathy is something that you just practice. You have to do it to get it," Howard stressed. "I think it's worth working those muscles out, especially under times of duress. I think our country needs a lot more of that working out and building those muscles because we're a democracy, and that's what we need to do."
Penn has put together a program to extend the Political Empathy Lab's concept to other locations nationwide.
Support for this reporting was provided by Lumina Foundation.
get more stories like this via email