This article was produced by Resource Rural.
Broadcast version by Terri Dee for Kentucky News Connection reporting for the Resource Rural-Public News Service Collaboration

Anna Carey jokes that she might like animals more than people, depending on the person. Her affinity for four-legged companions has kept her involved as special projects manager for the Leslie County Fiscal Court, the region’s municipal government that also manages the community animal shelter.

After experiencing an animal overpopulation boom following the pandemic, the rural shelter enclosed an outdoor slab to create more usable space for the dogs and cats they house. That part of the shelter, as well as the lighting throughout the facility — were ripe for efficiency upgrades. Since the county faces an increasingly tight budget, Carey said it made sense to find ways to save money wherever possible.

When she was approached by the Mountain Association about a grant opportunity that would allow the county to install solar panels on the shelter at a fraction of the full-price cost, and save money on future energy costs, she proceeded without hesitation. Carey worked with them as well as The Nature Conservancy and the Appalachian Solar Finance Fund to secure grant funding that collectively totaled more than $90,000 for the $112,000 project. The Leslie County Fiscal Court only had to contribute $20,000.

The county will also be able to obtain a tax credit from the federal government for this project, thanks to the Inflation Reduction Act, making the final project cost for the county essentially zero. 

“It just makes economic sense for the county,” Carey said about the minimal contribution the county would have to make. “It would decrease their bills and we could hook it up to batteries. And it would offer more long-term resiliency.”

“It’s a very clear savings. We’re in the final stages of it and the installer said that he can already see the consumption we need from the power company is going way down,” Carey said, noting that the Mountain Association helped them “basically do everything” throughout the process.

The solar installer programmed the system to switch from grid usage to battery usage during peak periods of energy consumption. With this feature the shelter can avoid being charged higher demand rates from the utility company. The shelter expects to save $5,000 in electricity costs annually.

“That’s super smart,” Carey said. “When they’re charging us the most, we can use the sun.”

Carey says that one of the most gratifying elements of the solar installation is the fact that the county’s financial contribution to the project came from coal severance funds. Those funds are accrued through taxes imposed on coal mining.

Historically Leslie County’s economy was fueled by coal. In a community that once relied so heavily on the coal industry, clean energy can be a touchy subject. Carey thinks that once people see how much money the county saves that it can put into other things for the community that this solar project and any that come in the future will be readily welcomed. It’s also an example of how the region can continue its legacy of energy production and one more way historic coal revenue contributes to its continued energy security today. 

She also appreciates that this solar installation was an example of the county testing a new solution. The cost to the county was low, the benefits and savings could be significant, and it could end up being a case study for the county on reducing costs elsewhere at other municipal buildings. 

“We’re lucky. I don’t know how we got so lucky,” Carey said of receiving the grant funding. “It’s the fiscal court’s job to be fiscally responsible. So, we’re doing our job. Sometimes it’s that simple.”


This article was produced by Resource Rural.

Minnesota is cited in a new research brief outlining the obstacles America would face in trying to reopen coal plants, an idea prioritized by the Trump administration.

President Donald Trump has signed an executive order aiming to boost coal production, despite coal's shrinking presence in the energy sector.

The administration said the move can help meet growing electricity demand with the emergence of data centers but the Institute for Energy Economics and Financial Analysis predicts giving coal-fired power plants new life would be costly.

Dennis Wamsted, energy analyst at the institute, said it does not make sense.

"It's not an 'evil conspiracy' to push coal out of the market," Wamsted pointed out. "The reality is that coal is the most expensive resource, and so it is rightfully used the least, or used last."

He points to Xcel Energy's Sherco facility near the Twin Cities, a coal plant being phased out and replaced with a massive solar operation. Wamsted noted utilities are planning for other sources because they have proved to be reliable and less costly. The analysis found 24 of the 102 recently closed U.S. coal plants are already torn down and restarting others would require big investments due to their age.

Wamsted added time is another problem because of the maintenance backlog in getting coal plants back online or in some cases rebuilt. He argued investors would not be interested in waiting to get an older plant reopened only to shut it down again because of the declining appetite for coal.

"In 20 years or 30 years, that plant, which would still be relatively new, would probably be what we call a stranded asset," Wamsted stressed.

Like clean energy infrastructure, Wamsted said ratepayers would be asked by utilities to cover the construction costs for increasing coal production. The difference, he explained, is sources like wind and solar are poised to stick around much longer and they do not have the price volatility linked with fossil fuels.

A bill to promote virtual power plants goes before the California State Assembly Utilities and Energy Committee next week. Virtual power plants are networks of home energy devices like smart thermostats, stationary home batteries, and electric vehicles that can be used as power sources during peak hours, which lowers the amount of power that electric utilities have to provide.

Assemblymember John Harabedian, D-Pasadena, said virtual power plants would reduce the need to build costly transmission lines and polluting natural gas plants.

"This bill, really in utilizing virtual power plants, is about affordability and reliability and sustainability. It's a cost-saving measure, and it's also an easier way to meet demand throughout the state during peak hours," he explained.

At least 300,000 Californians are already getting paid as part of the Demand Side Grid Support program, agreement that allows the utilities to pull power stored in their smart devices' batteries to power their home.

Harabedian said Assembly Bill 740 would direct the California Energy Commission to make plans to expand the use of virtual power plants, following the success of a pilot program.

"It has prevented blackouts. It has delivered over 500 megawatts of capacity, about the same as three gas peaker plants, and has saved millions of dollars already," he continued. "So, the pilot program has been undeniably successful. We just need to scale it."

A recent study found that virtual power plants could save California residents $750 million per year in traditional power system costs. Some are concerned that utilities may earn less money if the programs expand. So far, there is no registered opposition to the bill.


get more stories like this via email

While Nevada ranks among the top states for electric vehicle sales, one local business says it is seeing less demand for charging stations, and has to make some tough decisions as the Trump administration cuts climate and infrastructure investments. Allegiant Electric LLC in Las Vegas installs residential and commercial EV charging stations.

Andrea Vigil, chief operating officer of Allegiant Electric, said they were ramping up for a project for the U.S. Postal Service - but were notified it had been shelved. It's just one of the setbacks they've faced as Trump rescinds unspent Inflation Reduction Act funds. Vigil said not only will the clean energy economy take a hit, so will businesses like hers.

"We've already had to reduce some of our employees just because of, you know, the fact that there has been a decline in the installation requests on the EV chargers," she explained. "That is actually a big part of our business."

EVs accounted for about 8% of new car sales in the U.S. last year, partly thanks to Biden-era tax incentives and policies that sparked buyers' interest. Automakers had also prioritized EV production. But with Trump in the White House, Vigil says she and her husband will have to pivot on their business strategies.

Vigil added that Trump's tariffs have also been difficult to adapt to, and they've already noticed their material costs skyrocket.

"A lot of the material on the electrical side comes from Mexico and it needs to cross over, back and forth, eight times just before it's able to get into the United States," she continued. "We just bought a roll of wire, it was just a fourth of what we normally get - and the price has nearly tripled."

Paul Bordenkircher, president of Nevada EV Association, said due to the president's relationship with Elon Musk, many folks in the market for an EV are steering away from Tesla. He says other brands, like Hyundai and Kia, are profiting.

"I see other brands picking up some of the uptake with, unfortunately, Tesla's decline in sales. Because people are discovering that yes, there are other options, that EVs don't just exist from the Tesla brand," he contended.