HARRISBURG, Penn. - A bill to clean up the Chesapeake Bay Watershed was unanimously approved by a Senate committee Wednesday. Pennsylvania has a major stake in the Chesapeake Clean Water Act since the state's tributaries and rivers provide half the bay's fresh water, while the state must adhere to federal standards on pollution levels of those contributing waterways.

Will Baker, president of the Chesapeake Bay Foundation, supports the bill because it would allow the federal government to ensure that states meet pollution reduction targets. In a compromise, however, Democrats agreed to drop any connection to a federally mandated "pollution diet," known as a Total Maximum Daily Load.

"Instead, the bill connects to existing water quality standards, which so far have not been met, with flexibility as to how they get there over the next fifteen years or so."

Baker says the Senate action is just one of many that will have to take place before victory can be declared.

"I describe it as just the first game in the World Series has been won. We have a long way left to go and a lot of hurdles, but it is a good day and we should celebrate."

Lamonte Garber, the Foundation's agriculture program manager, says the measure offers waters in the state a brighter, and cleaner future.

"It could just as well be called the Pennsylvania Clean Streams Act, because it is going to have a profound impact on how we protect our local streams here in Pennsylvania."

Farmers are opposing the bill, arguing its proposed regulation of farm runoff would present a great financial burden. Republicans were concerned the legislation would have broadened the powers of the Environmental Protection Agency, but those on both sides of the aisle agree that, with the compromise, the bill now stands a better chance of full Senate approval.




get more stories like this via email

Arkansas lawmakers passed several bills during this year's legislative session to upgrade and improve the state's water and wastewater systems.

One of the measures is Act 578, which would provide $500 million for projects through 2043.

Arkansas Secretary of Agriculture Wes Ward said the state's current infrastructure has been in place for decades, and repairs are constantly needed.

"There's still a very big need," said Ward. "Just about every week, we hear stories of some sort of water-wastewater system failing, or not adequate or needs to expand or needs to contract. All of those infrastructure issues continue."

Act 578 must be approved by voters in the 2026 general election. Lawmakers also passed a $25 million grant program to help municipalities in emergency situations.

More than a half a million dollars in bills were passed during the session to address current and future water needs of all 75 Arkansas counties.

Ward said the state's water plan was updated last year for the first time since 2014.

"We expect when we turn on our faucet that it's going to work and that it's going to be clean and you can use it," said Ward. "We're seeing growing instances where that's not always the case, and so it's incredibly important - we do want people to take it for granted, but they also need to understand there's a lot of infrastructure and things behind the scenes to make that work."

Officials are currently taking an inventory of all levees across the state to ensure they are structurally sound and can function properly during heavy flooding.





get more stories like this via email

North Dakota is facing growing opposition to two massive dairy operations planned near the Red River. Environmental advocates say the projects could harm water quality locally and in downstream communities - including Lake Winnipeg in Canada.

Madeline Luke, a volunteer with the Dakota Resource Council, said farms proposed in Trail County and Abercrombie would accommodate more than 37,000 animals. She said she believes the massive operations would generate waste on a scale the state has never seen.

"These dairies are situated within a mile and a half of the Red River," she said. "Any water pollution that occurs will go straight into the river and end up in Lake Winnipeg. Lake Winnipeg has been labeled the most endangered lake in the world."

North Dakota's anti-corporate farming law, which once limited large-scale livestock operations, was weakened in 2021, opening the door to more industrial agriculture across the state.

James Beddome, executive director of the Manitoba Eco-Network, said cross-border collaboration is essential, since manure runoff from North Dakota could feed algae blooms in one of Canada's largest lakes.

"Sixty football fields worth of manure slurry, and both of these operations are within one and a half miles of the Red River," he said. "The Red River then connects to Lake Winnipeg. What they're doing there is going to have impacts to us downstream here in Manitoba."

Opponents have argued that the mega-dairies threaten local water, public health and small farms, warning that decisions made in North Dakota could have international consequences. Groups on both sides of the border are urging stricter oversight before permits are finalized.

The Mississippi River tops a new list of America's most endangered rivers, in part because federal officials propose shifting flood disaster costs to states.

The Federal Emergency Management Agency's acting chief advocates moving recovery responsibilities to state governments.

Eileen Shader, senior director of flood plain restoration for the advocacy group American Rivers, which issued the report, warned it could destabilize flood protections for communities along the Mississippi.

"The Trump administration has called for FEMA to be dramatically changed, if not eliminated," Shader pointed out. "We thought it was really important to highlight the importance of FEMA and the federal role in managing disasters like flooding to our local communities."

The 2025 Most Endangered Rivers report noted it is the Mississippi's 13th appearance on the list, citing the river's history of "catastrophic floods," which have shaped national disaster policies.

FEMA has historically followed what can be described as a "locally executed, state-managed, federally supported" disaster model. Shader argued the partnership is critical for multistate crises.

"Especially we see really catastrophic events, we see national disasters declared, which opens up a lot of federal funding which can then flow to states and local communities to help them to recover and to become more resilient in the future," Shader emphasized. "It's a shared responsibility."

About 20 million people depend on the Mississippi River for drinking water, agriculture and wildlife habitat, which advocates say are all at risk if FEMA reduces flood response support this summer.


get more stories like this via email