NEW HILL, N.C. - Plans are moving ahead for the construction of a $327 million sewage treatment facility in the town of New Hill in Wake County. Opponents aren't giving up the years-long fight against it, though, arguing that New Hill, a community with a large minority and poor population, is being taken advantage of by its more affluent neighbors. The towns of Cary, Apex and Morrisville, united for the project as Western Wake Partners, intend to start construction in early spring.

Christopher Brook, staff attorney for the Southern Coalition for Social Justice, explains that this fight extends beyond New Hill.

"There's a huge historical trend of communities of color and also poor communities being the sites and the hubs for undesirable portions of communities."

Opponents of the sewage treatment plant say its construction will have significant social and environmental effects, because of its location in the heart of New Hill's historic district. Western Wake Partners says they looked at more than 30 sites before selecting the location. A recently-released study by the Army Corp of Engineers found the New Hill site to have environmental impacts comparable to other sites on the list.

Brook points to other sites in the area that would be more acceptable to New Hill residents.

"The community's been very clear that they're fine with the sewage treatment plant being built in their general vicinity, but they would just prefer it be built at one of these alternative sites that's not in the middle of their community."

The sewage treatment plant would also provide sewer services to some residents and businesses in New Hill that are currently using wells and septic tanks.


get more stories like this via email

Despite extensive opposition, the Virginia Reliability Project is moving forward.

This month, the state's Marine Resources Commission issued a wetlands permit for the project, although 175 Virginia residents submitted comments, all in opposition. The Virginia Reliability Project calls for constructing compressor stations and expanding a gas line which has been operating since the 1950s with a larger-diameter pipeline.

Anne Havemann, general counsel and deputy director of the Chesapeake Climate Action Network, said the project does not line up with Virginia's climate goals, and a report from the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission appeared to confirm it.

"In the final Environmental Impact Statement that FERC has to issue, it clearly said, 'This project will increase Virginia's climate emissions by 2%,'" Havemann reported.

She added legal action is being considered to halt the project. Some have voiced concern over locating part of the pipeline extension near Hillpoint Elementary School. Others cite safety concerns, after a pipeline explosion in July in Strasburg. The utility company, T.C. Energy, said the pipeline upgrade is needed for safety and energy efficiency.

A compressor station for the project would be built in Petersburg, which is already considered an environmental justice community. The Public Interest Network noted a new methane gas leak is reported about every 40 hours.

Charles Brown II, Hampton Roads organizer for the Chesapeake Climate Action Network, said it is common for projects with environmental risks to be built in majority-Black communities.

"You look at Petersburg being on the forefront of this kind of stuff," Brown observed. "Then you look at areas like parts of Suffolk and Chesapeake, where the residents have made it clear they don't want these projects because of the health impacts of construction, or just it being a methane pipeline."

Petersburg is ranked as the least healthy area in the state on the University of Wisconsin's County Health Rankings and Roadmaps.

Advocates are applauding the Washington, D.C., Public Service Commission's decision to pause a Washington Gas infrastructure rebuild known as Project Pipes.

The project began in 2014 as a 40-year plan to replace all the District's aging natural gas infrastructure, at a projected cost to ratepayers of $4.5 billion. The project is nearing the end of Phase 2 but last Tuesday the commission voted to put a Washington Gas request for a $57 million extension of the phase on hold. The commission cited concerns about the cost and the company's inability to reduce the number of leaks.

Tim Oberleiton, senior attorney for the nonprofit Earthjustice, said the approach of replacing all the gas infrastructure distracts from what he believes is the main problem.

"Washington Gas has incurred millions of dollars in penalties for failing to meet agreed-upon leak-reduction targets," Oberleiton pointed out. "Despite spending hundreds of millions of ratepayer dollars on this program, leaks are not moving down in a meaningful way. In fact, last year in D.C., the Beyond Gas campaign measured leaks across the city [and] found hundreds of active leaks across all eight wards."

In a statement to Public News Service, Canadian-owned AltaGas, parent company of Washington Gas, said Project Pipes targets the riskiest leak-prone pipes in the system.

The commission requested additional information from Washington Gas including data on the number of miles of pipe replaced in years past and associated repair costs, as well as the number of leak repairs conducted in past years. The request seeks performance metrics on each phase of the project, as well as data going back to 2005, 9 years prior to the start of Project Pipes.

The commission did not weigh in on the prospects for Phase 3 of the project, but advocates say Project Pipes runs counter to the city's climate goals, including a pledge to be carbon-neutral by 2045, which anticipated continual movement away from fossil fuels and toward renewable energy sources for homes.

Oberleiton argued committing billions to new gas infrastructure will create an incentive to keep using a technology known to contribute to climate change. He noted a number of other cities have cut spending for similar projects or delayed them.

"In Illinois, the Illinois Commerce Commission, which is the PSC out there, put a halt on any and all activities in this regard, citing the cost overruns and climate risks," Oberleiton pointed out.

Community groups are joining the opposition. In November, the D.C. Advisory Neighborhood Commission representing Glover Park and Cathedral Heights passed a resolution opposing funding for Phase 3 and calling on the Public Service Commission to revise the project to focus on existing leaks and scaling new investment to match the city's energy and climate goals.

Advocates often refer to natural gas as methane, which is its primary component. As a greenhouse gas, methane is 25 times more potent than carbon dioxide at trapping heat in the atmosphere. In homes, research shows the use of methane gas for cooking contributes to poor air quality and releases toxic compounds into the air including known carcinogens such as benzene.

Naomi Cohen-Shields, D.C. campaign manager for the Chesapeake Climate Action Network, said use of the term "natural gas" amounts to greenwashing by the gas industry.

"It's putting this idea into our heads that this is a clean form of energy that we can trust, that it's something that is safe to have in our homes, that it's better for the environment," Cohen-Shield explained. "We're beginning to dismantle that as the science is pointing more and more clearly to the fact that fracked gas, methane gas, is not a clean source of energy, that it's extremely harmful for the planet and also for people's health when it's burned in their homes."

A high-stakes global climate conference wrapped up this week, with a new agreement concerning fossil fuels in place.

But it wasn't just elected leaders having talks - environmental justice advocates from Minnesota are reflecting on their participation.

At the two-week-long Conference of the Parties (COP) 28 summit, some 200 countries agreed to a more aggressive push in phasing out energy sources like coal.

Underneath those high-profile negotiations were discussions about helping under-developed countries affected by climate disasters.

Carolina Ortiz, associate executive director with Minnesota's Communities Organizing Latino Power and Action, or COPAL, said it aligns with her team's desire to make environmental justice a priority.

"We need to continue pressuring our world leaders to do better," said Ortiz, "and to continue making sure that we're putting community lives before profit."

Earlier in the conference, leaders agreed to establish a loss and damage fund of nearly $800 million for smaller nations vulnerable to climate change.

Advocates for some of those countries say it's a positive step but stress the need for sustainable help.

As for the fossil fuel agreement, some nations acknowledge that implementation will be vital for that plan to work.

COPAL was part of a regional delegation - led by the organization Climate Generation - that attended the conference. Officials said the goal was to introduce voices they feel aren't heard.

Ortiz said the public needs to know more about things like climate migration, and that it's not just an issue happening elsewhere in the world.

"You know," said Ortiz, "we're seeing it from people that live in South Minneapolis, North Minneapolis - different parts of Minnesota - that are living in disadvantaged communities where they're being more directly impacted by pollution and other things like that that affect their daily lives."

Ortiz suggested that as regional climate issues worsen, people living in those underserved communities could be forced to uproot their lives in hopes of improving health outcomes.

Meanwhile, climate analysts say disasters elsewhere in the country might prompt people to move to places like the Midwest, raising questions about whether "haven cities" have enough resources.