Microsoft is ponying up $8.5 billion to buy Skype with its user base of 170 million people. Microsoft plans to integrate Skype's video and voice technology into products such as Xbox, Outlook e-mail and Windows mobile phones.

Analysts will debate for some time whether it's a good business deal. But how will it affect Skype's devoted customers?

John Nichols, co-founder of FreePress, a national media reform organization, is concerned about too few companies controlling too many tiers of communication.

"They're both good companies in many ways. There's a lot to be said for both of them. But when you put them together, you have fewer options."

Matt Wood, associate director of Media Access Project, another watchdog group, says the deal may be a "net" positive. His organization hopes Microsoft will more strongly embrace network neutrality and other policies aimed at keeping the Web free, partly because services such as Skype which depend on access to existing networks potentially could be crippled by "large and anti-competitive carriers like AT&T and Verizon."

"Whatever consumer benefits are to come from this deal, though, we think it's essential that they be preserved and enhanced through open Internet protections and principles and policies that are enforced by the FCC."

A spokesman for the Federal Communications Commission had no comment. It is seen as unlikely the deal will require FCC approval.

Michael Ballmer, Microsoft's chief executive officer, along with Skype CEO Tony Bates, announced the deal at a news conference in Redmond, Wash.

"Microsoft and Skype together will bring together hundreds of millions - or, as Tony said, billions - of consumers and empower them to communicate in new and interesting ways."

Microsoft says more advertisements on its video service are likely.

Skype is free if used between Skype customers. Revenue comes from long-distance charges when Skype users call telephone numbers and mobile phones. That model raises the question of whether future success - in the form of more free users - will hurt the new division's bottom line, and how Microsoft would address the resulting revenue loss.


get more stories like this via email

New York lawmakers are considering a bill to broaden statewide outreach through local media. The Local Community and Ethnic Media Commitment Act would require state agencies to spend about 50% of their print and digital advertising budget in local community and ethnic news outlets. This issue hit home for State Senator Jessica Ramos, who introduced the bill, since she represents the multi-ethnic Jackson Heights neighborhood in Queens. A 2022 Census report finds more than 6-million people in places like New York City speak a language other than English. Ramos feels this bill is an effective way to get important information to people of all backgrounds.

"If we want people to take advantage of programs, if we want to educate people about different government processes, then we should certainly be doing so in their language, so that they're engaged and truly feel a part of our community - as they are," Ramos said.

While the bill has not faced much opposition, some media outlets feel government involvement in local media is complicated. In a 2021 report from Northwestern University, experts noted government financial support of local media might provide leverage for politicians to shape the news as they see fit. Currently the bill is in the Senate Finance Committee.

As lawmakers are still learning about the bill, it has not faced many legislative hurdles yet.
But Assemblymember Sarahana Shrestha, its sponsor, noted one barrier to getting the bill passed is time.

"Because of how much time the budget ate into, with a month delay," Shrestha said. "So on our side, with the Assembly, we're just rushing to get bills numbered, get bills moved through the committee."

She added having this provision in next year's budget would help all New Yorkers learn about new rules, programs and funding opportunities they might be eligible for. The current legislative session is set to adjourn June 8th.

Thousands of writers are currently on strike following a breakdown in negotiations with the Writers Guild of America and the Alliance of Motion Picture and Television Producers.

The strike could have a significant impact on Georgia's economy, which is heavily reliant on the film and television industry.

In 2022, Gov. Brian Kemp announced that the industry spent more than $4 billion in the state, making it a crucial part of Georgia's economy.

While talk shows have been the most affected, other productions could also suffer if the strike persists - according to Charles Bowen, Founder of the Savannah Film Alliance.

"If the WGA and the writers decide to actually picket an existing production," said Bowen, "many of the other unions will honor that picket line, and it's basically going to shut down the entire production."

Bowen noted that as writers seek better compensation for their work, they also grapple with new challenges from streaming and AI, which were not present during previous negotiations.

Lakisha Ginyard Louissaint is a director who has worked in Georgia. She stressed that the potential impact on local businesses and jobs goes beyond the immediate effects on writers and producers.

"Without them being able to tell a story," said Louissaint, "the PAs won't have a job, the background people won't have a job, and it puts a halt on a lot of things."

The AMPTP has committed to negotiating new contracts with the Directors Guild of America starting May 10.

This is the first strike to impact production since 2007, which lasted 100 days.




get more stories like this via email

The Texas Observer, a nonprofit news organization known for its liberal, independent reporting and cultural criticism, will continue publishing, after a successful fundraiser and reversed decision by the board of directors.

The paper's 17 employees learned of its parent organization's decision to lay them off and put the paper "on hiatus" from a Texas Tribune article in late March.

James Canup, former managing director for Texas Observer, resigned in protest. Since then, a GoFundMe campaign started by Canup has raised more than $300,000 to keep the Observer afloat.

Canup said the paper, which accepts no corporate advertising, has always relied on donations and philanthropy for its investigative reporting and cutting-edge commentary.

"It's sort-of a definer of progressive, liberal, populist values for Texas," Canup explained. "And that means that they can write and say things that nobody else is going to say."

The changing media landscape has forced more than 2,500 newspapers to close since 2005, according to a 2022 study by Northwestern University. The late firebrand journalist Molly Ivins worked at The Texas Observer in the early 1970s before moving to the New York Times.

Canup believes the watchdog journalism produced by the Observer is more important than ever in Texas.

"It's a miracle that the thing has survived for almost 70 years," Canup contended. "Progressives have been losing in this state for three decades and so, the wins are few and far between, and this one is satisfying."

The Northwestern study also noted the communities losing newspapers do not typically get a print or digital replacement, leaving 70 million residents -- a fifth of the country's population -- living in an area with no local news organizations. About 7% of U.S. counties now have no local newspaper.

Support for this reporting was provided by The Carnegie Corporation of New York.