Impact of Citizens United Infuriates Some WV Voters
Wednesday, March 21, 2012
CHARLESTON, W.Va. - Some West Virginians watching the impact of big money on the political process say they're furious about Citizens United, the Supreme Court decision which legalized unlimited corporate spending on campaigns.
Barbara Frierson of St. Albans, a member of West Virginians for Democracy, says she's angry about the way the presidential race has been influenced by big money, funneled through "super-PACs" which - according to figures from the Center for Public Integrity - have already spent more this year than in all of 2010. Frierson says the groups rarely are held responsible for their mudslinging.
"These PACs are not limited to telling the truth. They make things up about their other opponents, they make things up about their own candidate, and they can basically lie, cheat and steal."
West Virginians for Democracy pressed legislators to pass a resolution against Citizens United. Despite 50 co-sponsors, that proposal died in the Legislature - although Charles Town, Martinsburg and Jefferson County have passed similar resolutions.
Jefferson County Commissioner Frances Morgan, who was part of the unanimous vote there, says Citizens United blew a hole in the set of compromises that had controlled political spending.
"It has allowed money to enter politics to an extent that I really feel is taking politics away from the citizens and putting it in the hands of giant corporations."
The Supreme Court ruling has given corporations and labor unions the same free-speech rights as individuals. Other court decisions have ruled that spending money on campaign issue ads is a form of speech. The combination means Congress can't outlaw this type of spending, no matter how large.
Frierson thinks Citizens United has bent the political process completely out of shape. She cites the continued presidential candidacy of former House Speaker Newt Gingrich as an example, a campaign she says is funded almost entirely by Sheldon Adelson, a casino billionaire.
"Newt would have been out of there months ago, except he's got one guy who contributes huge amounts of money to his PAC."
The Sunlight Foundation says more than half of super-PAC money is spent on attack ads against a candidate's competitors. An ABC/Washington Post poll released last week found that seven out of 10 Americans think the super-PACs should be illegal.
get more stories like this via email
North Dakota's farming landscape is seeing policy shifts dealing with corporate ownership of agricultural interests. Now, there's fresh debate at the …
Advocates for unpaid family caregivers in Maine say they'll need continued support beyond the recently passed paid family and medical leave program…
The Students for Justice in Palestine chapters at the University of Florida and the University of South Florida are filing lawsuits against the deacti…
A new report from WGU Labs, a nonprofit affiliate of Western Governors University based in Millcreek, Utah, is shedding light on the importance of …
Many older residents of Washington state are facing strains on their budgets -- and the government programs that could assist them are underused…
Bloomington and Indianapolis are getting some international recognition for the work they're doing to help the environment. The two have been named …
Health and Wellness
New Mexico activists are tapping today's World AIDS Day, Dec. 1, to announce they'll ask the State Legislature to provide more money for treatment …
Bipartisan legislation that proposes the installation of solar panels in schools across Pennsylvania awaits a vote in the state Senate. The Solar …