Watchdogs: Power Plant Sales About the Company’s Needs, Not the Consumers
Monday, July 15, 2013
CHARLESTON, W.Va. - Consumer groups say an Appalachian Power plan to buy chunks of two big generating stations does more for Appalachian's parent company than for West Virginia ratepayers. The utility wants to buy additional generating capacity from the John Amos and Mitchell power plants, taking it off the hands of another subsidiary of American Electric Power and charging the cost to ratepayers here.
According to Byron Harris, director of the Public Service Commission's Consumer Advocate Division, the utility only needs half of what it wants to buy. He said ratepayers would lose a big rate reduction they should be getting.
"Acquiring these plants is going to increase their rates higher than what they otherwise would be, by at least $100 million per year," he said.
The company contends it's facing a big shortfall in generating capacity. Harris said the sale would lock ratepayers in at a time when electricity generated from coal is facing an uncertain future, including changing coal prices and competition from cheap natural gas.
"It's a billion-dollar asset transfer," he said. "That will be there forever and ever amen. It severely reduces your flexibility."
Harris said Appalachian has known about the coming shortfall for three years, but waited until the last moment to force the PSC to accept the proposal.
Cathy Kunkel, policy analyst at Energy Efficient West Virginia, said the company has admitted the sale is intended to help AEP reorganize its generating capacity. She said the company initially wanted to shift more of the Mitchell plant to Appalachian, until the AEP subsidiary in Kentucky decided to take on part of Mitchell.
"Because of some events in Kentucky, suddenly we're asked to acquire fifty percent of the Mitchell plant instead of eighty percent," she said. "It has nothing to do with the actual needs of the West Virginia utility, which haven't changed."
Appalachian Power serves about half of West Virginia. Similar deals in the other half of the state and in Kentucky could mean ratepayers there would also end up paying for shares of big coal-fired power stations.
The PSC will hear case number 12-1655 Tuesday through Thursday, but the decision may be some months later.
get more stories like this via email
SACRAMENTO, Calif. -- Climate activists are praising Gov. Gavin Newsom for signing a $15 billion climate action package Thursday, but argued he …
BROOKLYN, N.Y. -- Some New Yorkers are voicing concerns about the creation of not one, but two draft maps for congressional, State Senate and …
LANSING, Mich. -- Michigan advocates for children and families are praising many of the investments in the 2022 state budget passed this week…
DES MOINES, Iowa -- There is strong public support in Iowa to enact a state law that criminalizes elder abuse, a topic also being discussed by law …
CHICAGO -- Advocates for immigrants and refugees in Illinois traveled to Washington, D.C., this week to push for a pathway to citizenship for up to …
LITTLE ROCK, Ark. -- Arkansas produces more rice than any other state, and a new grant will help farmers explore ways to transition the industry to …
BISMARCK, N.D. -- North Dakota lawmakers in charge of redistricting have approved a preliminary draft of new legislative boundaries, but voters' …
SANTA FE, N.M. -- A New Mexico legislator is optimistic a bill will pass in the 2022 session to prohibit life sentences for juveniles convicted of …