DANBURY, N.C. - As North Carolina teacher salaries continue their downturn - 15 percent in the last 13 years, adjusted for inflation - there is an upturn in the number of teachers moonlighting to support their families. Almost a third of North Carolina's teachers are now working a second job during the school year, according to research being conducted at UNC Charlotte.

Stokes County High School teacher David Tesh umpires baseball games after hours to supplement his take-home pay, which amounts to $1,500 a month.

"I mean, it's pretty much working second-shift. It is frustrating. I love to teach, but the money is not good," Tesh said, "especially here."

Research at Auburn University suggests that teachers who moonlight spend about an hour less per week lesson planning. According to the National Center for Education Statistics, the average North Carolina teacher salary is $45,000 a year, more than $10,000 below the national average.

UNC Charlotte professor Paul Fitchett is one of the researchers analyzing the data from the National Center for Educational Statistics. He said North Carolina ranks third in the country when it comes to moonlighting teachers.

"You have these teachers who are being pulled in several different directions at once. One direction, they're teaching their kids and they love their jobs," Fitchett said. "At the same time, they're taking on additional responsibilities, many of them outside of the field of education."

More than half of those who moonlight are working elsewhere than in education, he added.

"I don't want to suggest that teachers shouldn't be allowed to have second jobs, but they should be creating these jobs for teachers within the schools" Fitchett explained.

North Carolina's teacher turnover rate is also increasing - with more than 13,000 teachers leaving the profession last year. Public Schools First NC featured Fitchett and his partner's research in a recent newsletter.

The report on teacher turnover is at www.ncpublicschools.org.




get more stories like this via email

The state has just launched the California Student Loan Debt Challenge, to let public service employees - like teachers, law enforcement, nurses, and government workers - know that time is running out to restructure their student loans.

The Biden administration has temporarily loosened the rules of the Public Service Loan Forgiveness program, which wipes away a person's remaining college debt after 10 years on the job.

But State Attorney General Rob Bonta warned that people need to apply for a waiver by October 31 - or miss out on tens of thousands of dollars in debt relief.

"Nearly 1 million Californians can qualify for Public Service Loan Forgiveness," said Bonta, "but only about 10,000 have received it. So, let's get those numbers up."

The state is also asking public service employers to publicize the waiver to their workers, who can now claim credit for years of payments that had been excluded under previous rules - and thus reach the ten-year mark earlier.

The waiver applies regardless of the repayment plan, the loan type, or the timeliness and extent of past payments. Find out more on the website 'studentaid.gov/pslf.'

Bonta pointed out that he sued the last administration because the Department of Education was denying the vast majority of PSLF applications.

"During the first round of eligible loan cancellations, the Trump administration denied 99%," said Bonta. "My office sued, Congress took action, we joined with the advocates here - and ultimately, we won the fight."

The state blames the low rate of participation on poor administration of the program, misconduct by some of the loan servicers, and a highly complex application process.

Support for this reporting was provided by Lumina Foundation.

CORRECTION: The $3.7 billion figure represents an increase in education investments during the eight-year Wolf Administration, not the Pennsylvania state education budget, which is $16 billion. (1:25 p.m. MDT, Aug. 10, 2022)

After eight years, the Pennsylvania school-funding lawsuit is in the hands of the judge, creating a waiting game heading into the new school year.

The oral argument ended in July. Advocates argued the way Pennsylvania schools are funded violates the education clause and equal-protection provision of the state constitution.

Deborah Gordon Klehr, executive director of the Education Law Center, said students of color are disproportionately affected in underfunded districts in low-wealth communities, where they lack such basics as functioning school libraries and up-to-date textbooks.

"The inadequate resources prevent many Pennsylvania students from meeting academic standards set by the state," Klehr asserted. "The state legislature has an obligation to ensure that every student, not only those living in select ZIP codes, receive the basic resources they need."

Klehr added Pennsylvania has one of the widest gaps between low-wealth and high-wealth school districts in the nation. A typical high-wealth district in the commonwealth spends about $4,800 more per student than a low-wealth district, and the gap has been growing.

With trial proceedings are over, Klehr acknowledged the judge's decision may take some time, and predicted it may not signal the end of the battle.

"We are confident about our case," Klehr stated. "But whatever the outcome, an appeal by the losing side is likely, to the Pennsylvania Supreme Court."

Klehr noted the General Assembly does not have to wait for the outcome of the case. It has a legal obligation under the state constitution to solve the school-funding crisis as soon as possible.

Gov. Tom Wolf recently announced his administration had increased education funding by more than $3.7 billion since 2015, including a $1.8 billion increase for the coming school year.

Klehr emphasized it is an important confirmation of the spending levels needed in coming years.

"Those kinds of increases will need to be sustained in the years ahead to help get local districts to adequate, equitable levels of funding," Klehr contended. "And bring Pennsylvania up from the bottom in the share of education funding that is provided by the state."

Klehr stressed Pennsylvania currently relies on local funding for schools more than almost any other state. Her organization advocates shifting the funding system to recognize the very different needs of different communities.

Hispanic and Latino workers have high employment rates in the U.S. but continue to experience a shortage of jobs paying enough to lift them into the middle class, according to a new study.

Jessica Vela, research assistant in tax and budget policy at the Center for American Progress, said America relies on millions of front line workers, but the typically low-wage jobs are often held by people of color, and the darker their skin, the more discrimination they face.

She added many Latino workers, particularly those of Mexican, Guatemalan, Honduran and Salvadoran descent, work in jobs where labor violations are common, including hospitality or caregiving.

"This is the root of systemic racism within the U.S.," Vela asserted. "This can impact individuals trying to find a job, trying to keep a job."

Census data show the percentage of Latino adults with at least an associate's degree is 20 points lower than for white adults. Earlier this year, the Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board began efforts to examine whether a postsecondary degree is producing credentials of value leading to higher earnings for all, and not just some students.

Latinos are 17% of the overall workforce, but represent 24% of the tipped worker population. According to the report, tipped workers often make subminimum wages, are at the mercy of the economy, and were laid off by the millions during the pandemic.

Vela added many of them were Hispanic women, who lost jobs at alarming rates starting in April 2020.

"Hispanic women 20 and older experienced one of the highest unemployment rates by race, gender, ethnicity; a little over 20%," Vela reported. "Losing jobs, it can be really difficult with labor markets to find other jobs, leaving them vulnerable to not being able to provide."

The U.S. Hispanic and Latino population is projected to comprise the majority of net new workers this decade. At the same time, the U.S. wage gap is related to education levels, work experience and immigration status.

Advocates want a higher federal minimum wage and more grants to help people afford to go to college or a trade school.

Support for this reporting was provided by Lumina Foundation.