FRANKFORT, Ky. - The home-security industry is sounding the alarm about deregulating phone service in the Commonwealth.
The Kentucky Senate on Monday approved what's become known as the AT&T bill, making it the first bill to land on the governor's desk this legislative session. The bill frees the big phone companies from having to provide traditional landline service in urban areas and allows them to avoid stringing new landlines in rural Kentucky.
Alarm Industry Communications Committee attorney Ben Dickens said that could adversely impact thousands of consumers and businesses that rely on alarm monitoring and other life-saving services.
"The FCC has a pending proceeding right now looking at these very issues," Dickens said, "and a big focus is 9-1-1."
The trade group also claimed that robust competition does not exist to ensure reliable services at reasonable rates to consumers. However, the telecommunications industry convinced lawmakers that deregulation is needed to increase investments in broadband.
"We're already behind, we're falling further behind every day," said Hood Harris, president of AT&T Kentucky, "and we'll continue falling further behind until we encourage this investment to come to Kentucky by modernizing our laws."
During committee testimony, Harris did not provide lawmakers estimates on what new investments would be made. The Senate passed the bill 30-3 on Monday, a week after the House gave its approval 71-25.
Gov. Steve Beshear said he will sign the bill because he expects it to spur new investments and because it provides "the necessary consumer protections." However, Dickens said consumers should be worried about reliability.
"There are distinct life-safety issues that rear themselves," he said, "when you change out a copper network without due consideration to what network features are required to make sure that the customers that pay for the alarm service get what they paid for."
With deregulation, AT&T could immediately stop offering basic phone service to new and existing customers in the state's urban areas, from Louisville to towns as small as London and Nicholasville.
The text of the bill, HB 152, is online at lrc.ky.gov.
get more stories like this via email
Concerns about potential voter intimidation have spurred several states to consider banning firearms at polling sites but so far, New Hampshire is not among them.
Only a dozen states and Washington, D.C., prohibit both open and concealed-carry weapons at voting locations.
Emma Brown, executive director of the Giffords Law Center to Prevent Gun Violence, said most of the bans were enacted after the 2020 election, when unfounded claims of widespread voter fraud took hold.
"The risk of gun violence at the polls is heightened," Brown contended. "Which means that legislation at the state level is even more critical than it ever has been."
Brown argued America's elections are free and fair, and prohibiting guns at polling sites and government locations is constitutional. Opponents countered the bans unfairly disarm law-abiding gun owners.
Recent surveys reveal election workers have faced increased threats and harassment since the 2020 election with one in three reporting some form of abuse. And nearly half of election workers said they are concerned for their colleagues' safety.
Brown pointed out armed intimidation tactics disproportionately target people of color and add to the growing exodus of election workers.
"This is a threat that we can't ignore," Brown stressed. "These attacks have also served as a deterrent to Black and brown election workers, who've historically been a really key part of ensuring that our democracy endures on Election Day."
As state legislatures consider banning guns at voting sites, legislation in Congress known as the "Vote Without Fear Act" would place a nationwide ban on weapons within 100 feet of a federal election facility, with exceptions for on-duty law enforcement and security personnel. It has been languishing in a House committee for a year.
Support for this reporting was provided by The Carnegie Corporation of New York.
get more stories like this via email
Nassau County's executive wants to deputize residents who hold gun permits.
County Executive Bruce Blakemen's plan involves training 100 residents for "the protection of human life and property during an emergency." Little else has been made public about the plan but it has been met with widespread opposition and concern.
Delia DeRiggi-Whitton, minority leader of the Nassau County Legislature, said there are many ways it can go wrong.
"Emergencies are very chaotic situations by nature and all of a sudden, someone shows up that a police officer might not recognize or isn't identified correctly," DeRiggi-Whitton pointed out. "We're just waiting for a disaster to happen."
She added some Nassau County police officers are against the plan and, like many others, feel it's unnecessary. Blakeman said he is relying on New York State County Law 655, which grants sheriffs authority to deputize added personnel for emergencies.
DeRiggi-Whitton noted legal options are being pursued to stop the plan from being enacted.
The lack of information has made residents anxious about what the plan would do. Some have said the effort, along with Blakeman's ban on female trans athletes in county athletic facilities, are solutions without problems.
Susan Gotthrer, director of the Nassau Regional Chapter of the New York Civil Liberties Union, said more pressing issues need to be addressed.
"We have real problems in Nassau County," Gotthrer argued. "We have housing shortages, we have lack of opportunities, we have education issues, high taxes. We would really like to see Mr. Blakeman putting his energies towards real governing issues and not imaginary ones like this."
Blakeman is not alone in pushing to deputize gun owners. Support for militias is growing among conservative politicians. Some residents are worried the armed people will be used to intimidate voters at or after the 2024 election. Nassau County is considered one of the safest counties, not just in the state but in the nation.
get more stories like this via email
April is National Volunteer Month, and Nebraskans rank high nationwide for their willingness to volunteer.
In the most recent Census Bureau/AmeriCorps report, Nebraska ranked seventh in the nation for formal volunteering and second for informal volunteering.
However, many nonprofits still need more help.
Central Nebraska Community Action Partnership in Loup City serves 21 counties with programs in housing, early childhood, family outreach and community health. It serves 72 counties with its veterans programs.
Executive Director Cheryl Holcomb said it would struggle to offer these services without volunteers.
"Throughout our agency, it is vital - vital that we have volunteers that provide services as well," she said. "We always have a need for more."
Holcomb explained that for their Head Start programs, volunteers do more than help the teachers and children. Their hours also contribute to the 25% match the program's grant funding requires. Volunteer time is valued at nearly $32 an hour, and most grants count volunteer hours as an "in-kind" match. Nationally, women volunteer at a slightly higher rate than men, and Gen-Xers have the highest percentage by age group.
Like other nonprofits providing food assistance, Holcomb said they've seen an increase in need without an accompanying increase in volunteers. She added that the funding for its Commodity Supplemental Food Program, which serves people 60 and older, isn't sufficient to support the program.
"So, relying on volunteers to help offset that program is crucial," she said. "They rely on volunteers to come in and package the food; they rely on volunteers to make deliveries in the specific community."
Central Nebraska Community Action Partnership also relies on volunteers at its two food pantries, a quarterly mobile food pantry and four food warehouses.
There are nine Community Action agencies across the state. Although their programs vary, Holcomb said, all rely on volunteers.
get more stories like this via email