SEATTLE – More children in Washington now have health insurance. That's the good news according to a report from the Georgetown University Center for Children and Families and the Seattle-based Children's Alliance, which credits the success of Apple Health for Kids and the Affordable Care Act in helping cut the rate of uninsured children in Washington to less than five percent – better than the national average.

Jon Gould, deputy director with the Children's Alliance, says families benefit when kids have health coverage, as well as the state's schools and economy.

"They're less likely to drop out of high school, they're more likely to graduate from college and they have better health and economic success as adults," says Gould. "There are so many benefits, not only for kids who are growing up, but also to us as a society."

Most of the 75,000 uninsured children in Washington are eligible for Apple Health for Kids, but are not enrolled.

Report co-author Joan Alker says many Washington children became covered when their parents enrolled in newly-available coverage under the Affordable Care Act.

"People don't think about Medicaid expansion as a kids' issue, but we know from past research that covering parents results in a strong what we call 'welcome mat' effect for kids," she says. "That means when the parent learns about their own coverage opportunity, they may learn their child is also eligible."

Gould says despite the encouraging numbers, significant barriers to health care persist for children of color. According to the U.S. Census, Latino and Pacific Islander children are nearly twice as likely as white children to be uninsured, and American Indian and Alaska Native children are three times more likely to remain uninsured.

"Some of those reasons are language access," says Gould. "We need more information that's available in the variety of languages that Washingtonians speak. We think when we do those improvements, we'll get to a point where every child is covered."

Nationally, the children's uninsured rate declined significantly from about seven percent in 2013 to six percent in 2014.

The Georgetown University Center for Children and Families report was released Wednesday.


get more stories like this via email

Missouri has stepped up to fight childhood hunger by providing food aid over the summer for kids who rely on school meals for nutrition.

The U.S. Department of Agriculture's SuN Bucks program, launched this year, provides eligible families with a one-time, $120 EBT card per child to help cover grocery costs during the summer months.

Christine Woody, food security policy manager for the nonprofit Empower Missouri, said she is happy the program is available for families. However, she noted Missouri state departments involved in distributing the benefits had delays, meaning kids needing summer food aid did not receive it until fall this year.

"I'm just grateful that Missouri did it and I think the department had a lot of lessons learned, so 2025 is going to be a whole different experience," Woody asserted. "I'm hopeful that the kids will actually get the benefits in the summer when their families actually need it."

Families have 122 days to use the one-time SuN Bucks benefit after receiving their card. Research shows almost half of the children in Missouri rely on school meals for nutrition.

The USDA recently announced an additional $1.3 billion investment to strengthen local food systems. Woody explained Missouri's SuN Bucks program is based on the federal P-EBT initiative, which aimed to support children who lost access to meals during COVID-19 school closures.

She added her organization and others led a grassroots effort to get Missouri on board.

"Praise the Lord, they agreed to fund and run the program and there's funding to run it again in 2025," Woody emphasized.

The Show-Me State could receive more than $92 million in an economic boost generated from the SuN Bucks initiative.


get more stories like this via email

Five years ago, Minnesota established a program to bolster well-being metrics for children of color and young Native American kids. Today, fund recipients are sharing their progress.

The Community Solutions for Healthy Child Development Grants are in their second round of funding following what advocates called a successful pilot beginning in 2019. Given Minnesota's long-standing racial disparities, community sites making use of the aid hope the kids they serve find stability as they grow.

Brook LaFloe, associate director of the Montessori American Indian Childcare Center in Roseville, said they have been able to do things like hire a social worker, which helps build trust.

"Especially with our people's history with the boarding school era, it still lingers in some of our older generations, right?" LaFloe noted. "That mistrust in school, that mistrust in giving their children up to other people."

LaFloe added her team has maintained full enrollment for key services, including a program catering to children prenatal to 3 years old. Organizations such as Children's Defense Fund-Minnesota pushed for permanent funding after the pilot phase. The state health department said current grants are funded through 2027, but it is unclear what might happen down the road with future deficits forecast.

In northwestern Minnesota, the nonprofit All Nations Rise, which serves tribal members of White Earth Nation, carries out early childhood programming through a cultural lens.

Beth Ann Dodds, program manager for the group, said they have used the grant money to offer an Indigenous parent leadership class.

"They're learning more about themselves, which you need to have -- that self-awareness -- in order to make some positive changes," Dodds observed. "Whether that's with yourself, with that's with your family, or whether that's in your community. "

She added the curriculum has reached nearly two dozen parents, helping more than 70 children.

The grants have also helped fund efforts at Grandmother's House, a language and culture immersion program through Fond du Lac Tribal College in Cloquet.

Persia Erdrich, lead teacher for the program, said she has seen firsthand how outreach connects younger Native people with their tribal identity, aiding them in the development process. She sees the positive effects through her son.

"I started as a parent in this program, and his first words were in Ojibwe, his first sentences," Erdrich recounted. "He's bilingual now."

By Vanessa Davidson / Broadcast version by Farah Siddiqi reporting for the Kent State NewsLab-Ohio News Connection Collaboration.

Ohio Rep. Gary Click (R-Vickery) in August proposed the STORK Act, which would allow expecting families to claim their unborn children as dependents on their income taxes starting the year the child is conceived.

Click says every dollar makes a difference for expecting families.

"You start planning and preparing ahead of time," he said. "The hospital won't even let you take them home without a car seat. So, you have to get that car seat, you get a crib, you get a bassinet, you get a pack-and-play, and you get all the little toys for a newborn, and you just stock up before they're born to get ready for that child."

However, some raise concern that the proposal could lead toward the recognition of fetal personhood, which could affect abortion rights within Ohio.

Danielle Firsich, director of public policy for Planned Parenthood Advocates of Ohio, said Click's proposal acts as a continued attempt to attack abortion rights following the passage of Issue 1 in 2023.

Firsich said there have been several other proposals that have tested fences and sought out loopholes to get around state codifications of reproductive rights, including similar bills proposed in Wisconsin, Florida, Kansas and Kentucky.

"We know that this argument - that someone can have tax credits for an unborn child - directly correlates with the concept that if you're receiving some sort of tax benefit, or tax credit, you are thereby able to be recognized as a person and be granted rights as such," Firsich said. "This is a movement that has come, largely, especially after the Dobbs decision."

Given Click's extensive history of pro-life advocacy - with one of his past proposals declaring fetal personhood from conception - Firsich believes the STORK Act could have possible ulterior motives.

Click denied such claims and called such rhetoric an "extremist attack."

"This bill recognizes the expenses that parents put out," said Click. "It doesn't say anything about the baby... this tax credit has no power to overturn a constitutional amendment."

Jessie Hill, a law professor at Case Western Reserve University who specializes in reproductive rights in Ohio, believes the proposal will have little impact on abortion rights.

"I just don't think that this is something that is going to really, in the end, make a big difference in light of Issue 1 still being there," Hill said. Issue 1 is "part of our constitution, and our constitution is supreme over state law," she added.

However, Hill believes concerns about the proposal aren't baseless. She pointed out that it's not clear whether parents would still be able to receive tax benefits for an unborn child even if the pregnancy isn't carried to term.

Firsich argues that Click should demonstrate his commitment to Ohio families by expanding paid family leave and offering affordable childcare.

"That would mean real change for pregnant people and for parents in the state of Ohio, not something like this," Firsich said.

The STORK Act is currently being reviewed by the Ohio House Ways and Means Committee.


This collaboration is produced in association with Media in the Public Interest and funded in part by the George Gund Foundation.


get more stories like this via email