GLENWOOD SPRINGS, Colo. – Los 20 centros de salud de Colorado, que muchas veces son la única opción para quienes viven fuera de las áreas metropolitanas, contribuyeron con 1.2 billones de dólares a la actividad económica en 2016, según revela el reciente reporte “Fortaleciendo la Salud y la Economía de Colorado” (Strenghtening Colorado’s Health and Economy).

Los centros de salud comunitaria de Colorado no sólo ofrecen cuidados de primer nivel; también están impulsando las economías estatal y locales. Un reporte publicado hoy califica las contribuciones directas, tales como nóminas y bienes y servicios adquiridos en los negocios locales, y también el efecto dominó que se deriva de tales gastos.

Comenta Ross Brooks, el CEO de los “Centros de la Salud Familiar de la Montaña” (Mountain Family Health Centers), que atienden el corredor I-70 y el Valle Roaring Fork.

“Hay 20 centros comunitarios de salud que sirven como casa de atención a la salud para casi tres cuartos de millón de personas. Esos centros de salud comunitaria generan $1.2 billones de dólares en actividad económica cada año.”

Los proyectos de construcción y remodelación de los centros de salud atraen inversión y nuevos negocios a las comunidades locales, y el informe también encontró que los centros ayudan además a traer y a retener a más residentes.

Los centros contribuyeron con 177 millones de dólares en ingresos fiscales locales, estatales y federales, y trajeron 114 millones en subsidios federales para Colorado.

La comunidad de los centros de salud del estado pusieron a trabajar a 5 mil trescientos coloradeños, y les dieron una ruta para sus carreras a doctores, dentistas, enfermeras, personal profesional de primer contacto, de disciplinas técnicas y contadores.

Pam McManus, presidenta y CEO de los “Centros Comunitarios de Salud Peak Vista” (Peak Vista Community Centers) dice que aportan un desarrollo crítico de la fuerza laboral a través de entrenamiento en el trabajo y programas de certificación formal.

“Y especialmente en localidades rurales se nos ve como un empleador importante, y eso tiene un impacto significativo. Siempre trabajamos para contratar gente local, y en parte es por eso que tenemos programas de capacitación, para apoyar a la economía local.”

Brooks agrega que los centros ayudan al total de la economía del estado de otra forma que no se está en el informe: reduciendo los costos de atención a la salud. Dice que la receta secreta es la prevención y los cuidados primarios.

“Dando a la gente primero la atención preventiva oportuna que necesita y ayudándole a que no ingrese sin necesidad al hospital, es la manera de ahorrarles dólares y recursos a quienes pagan impuestos.”

En 2016 los centros de salud brindaron una completa atención primaria de la salud a más de uno de cada ocho coloradeños. Desde entonces, esa cantidad ha crecido hasta uno de cada siete.


get more stories like this via email

After more than 50 years of use, some Michigan lawmakers say naloxone may not be the best choice in an overdose situation.

Naloxone is sometimes called the "Lazarus drug" because of its powerful ability to seemingly resurrect people after a drug overdose.

Sen. Kevin Hertel, D-St. Clair Shores, and some of his colleagues have introduced a bill which would open the door for what they say are more costly, but more powerful, antidotes.

"Given the prevalence of fentanyl in our communities, and how much stronger some of these drugs that we're now seeing are, we believe -- and in talking with others -- that there should be other tools to respond to an overdose," Hertel explained. "To make sure we're doing everything we can to save somebody's life."

Not everyone is on board with the proposed legislation, Senate Bill 542. Opponents argued the more expensive naloxone alternatives are not necessary, and using them would only increase profits for the pharmaceutical industry.

Jonathan Stoltman, director of the Opioid Policy Institute in Grand Rapids, said while the naloxone alternatives do help in overdose situations, they can also cause nasty side effects.

"The newer approaches, they put people into more severe withdrawal," Stoltman pointed out. "That's a pretty profound negative side effect. The one approach is very inexpensive and works great; the other approach is far more expensive and has this strong negative side effect."

Sponsors of the bill say they're hoping to give Michigan residents a chance to chime in on the issue in a public hearing sometime in June. Michigan saw more than 3,000 opioid overdose deaths in 2021.


get more stories like this via email

New Mexico saw record enrollment numbers for the Affordable Care Act this year and is now setting its sights on lowering out-of-pocket costs - those not reimbursed by insurance. More than 56,000 New Mexicans are enrolled in a medical health insurance plan on the state exchange - an increase of 12,000 people overall.

Colin Baillio, deputy superintendent with the state's Office of Insurance, said the state has boosted its outreach and made efforts to improve the overall consumer experience.

"We saw a 40% year-over-year increase, and New Mexico saw the biggest percentage increase during the open-enrollment period among all of the state-based marketplaces," he explained

Part of the enrollment increase is due to what's called the "unwinding" - a federal directive that required all states to redetermine Medicaid eligibility following a three-year pause on checks during the COVID pandemic. He said by using expanded tools made available by the federal and state government, 8% of New Mexico's population is now uninsured - down from 23% in 2010.

Following approval by lawmakers in the 2024 legislative session, the New Mexico governor signed seven health care-related bills into law - one of which requires annual reporting of prescription drug pricing. Baililo said the Affordable Care Act built the foundation that has allowed the state to pursue additional affordability initiatives.

"I'm really glad to see that there's so much interest in the next step of health reform, really leaning into these out-of-pocket cost issues and making it easier for people to afford to stay covered and see their doctors," he continued.

Two years ago, the state also passed a one-of-a-kind law that did away with behavioral health co-pays for people in certain insurance plans.

New York's medical aid-in-dying bill is gaining further support. The Medical Society of the State of New York is supporting the bill. New York's bill allows terminally ill people with only six months to live to use this option, with safeguards requiring two physicians' approval.

The bill's Assembly sponsor Amy Paulin, D-Westchester, said despite the growing support, other hurdles lie ahead.

"Now we have what I believe, if it came to the floor, a majority. There's still a hesitation on the part of leadership. You know, we need members to assure leadership that they no longer have reservations," she said.

Other newly resolved concerns center on making sure insurance companies and doctors who don't support this aren't held liable. She's optimistic the bill will pass after nine years in the Legislature. New York would be the 11th state along with Washington, D.C. to have medical aid in dying legislation.

Corinne Carey, senior New York campaign director with Compassion and Choices finds the pandemic drew a vivid picture of a person's end-of-life experience. There were images of people dying on ventilators, apart from loved ones, and unable to communicate. She said people began thinking about a "good death."

"And, what is a good death is being surrounded by loved ones, having some measure of control, experiencing the touch of your loved ones, and being the one in the driver's seat," she explained.

Now people have different options for end-of-life care, each of which presents various challenges. Polls show medical aid in dying has garnered considerable support since being introduced in 2015. A 2022 Compassion and Choices poll finds 57% of nurses support medical aid in dying professionally, although fewer support it personally.