Los grupos californianos preocupados por el destino de las especies animales y vegetales, en peligro de extinción, tienen temores bien fundados de que también peligre la Ley que protege a esas Especies Amenazadas.
El tiempo corre, y también el lapso que se abrió para que la ciudadanía emita su opinión sobre algunos cambios propuestos a la Ley, mediante los cuales la administración Bush busca darle carta blanca a las agencias federales para que decidan por sí mismas en materia de riesgos al medio ambiente por diversos proyectos, esto es, sin escuchar voces expertas en la materia. Manos libres.
Existe el temor de que al construir obras como presas o carreteras, el impacto que éstas tienen en el medio ambiente afecte su equilibrio de muchas maneras. Los conservacionistas argumentan que la intención que tiene la administración federal de cambiar la Endangered Species Act (Ley de Especies Amenazadas), daría un golpe mortal a las medidas que hoy protegen a casi 300 especies animales y vegetales de California, que ya están en peligro de extinción.
Variedades de peces como el esturión verde o el salmón Chúnik del Pacífico Norte, son sólo algunas de las especies que ahora enfrentan nuevos peligros, según la opinión de los científicos de la conservación. Ante la perspectiva de que los cambios a la Endangered Species Act (Ley de Especies Amenazadas) se aprobaran al vapor, como es la intención de la Casa Blanca, Andrew Wetzler, del Natural Resources Defense Council (Consejo de la Defensa de los Recursos Naturales), opina que sería altamente peligroso que las agencias federales tomaran decisiones basadas sólo en su punto de vista, y omitir la opinión de los expertos, que son quienes realmente saben de temas de conservación de la naturaleza.
“Si les quitas de las manos las decisiones finales y en cambio las pones en manos de agencias federales que tienen otras misiones y otros intereses que no son proteger la vida silvestre, vas a tener una distorsión del proceso de toma de decisiones.”
Patti Goldman, de Earthjustice, dice que la aprobación de las nuevas reglas tendría un impacto dramático sobre las casi 300 especies vegetales y animales que están en peligro de extinción en California.
“Hay especies amenazadas que dependen del bosque o que son impactadas por proyectos hidráulicos o por el uso de pesticidas. Y en todos esos casos, la desatención de las agencias de la vida silvestre ha sido crítica.”
Bajo las reglas actuales, las agencias federales como el U.S. Forest Service (Servicio Forestal), el área de ingeniería de las fuerzas armadas, deben tomar la opinión de los expertos en vida silvestre antes de comenzar proyectos como puentes, carreteras o similares. El argumento del Department of Interior (Departamento del Interior) para impulsar los cambios a la Ley es que si se evita la consulta a los expertos se ahorraría papeleo y el proceso sería más rápido. El lapso para que la ciudadanía exprese su opinión se extendió hasta mediados de octubre.
Las personas que quieran opinar sobre los cambios propuestos, pueden hacerlo en www. nrdcactionfund.org.
get more stories like this via email
The state Department of Natural Resources and Iowa State University are looking for volunteers to help create a new Bumble Bee Atlas.
Bees are an important part of the ecosystem, and scientists are figuring out their habitats to help them thrive.
Iowa is home to at least 14 species of bumble bees that help pollinate native wildflowers and flowering crops in farm fields and backyard gardens.
Iowa State University University Professor of Sustainable Agriculture and plant pathologist Matt O'Neal said the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service recently listed several bee species as endangered.
"And that includes the Rusty Patch bumble bee," said O'Neal, "20% of what it used to be, and that includes parts of Iowa. There is also evidence that other bumble species are in decline and so, this survey will give us a chance to see where those bees are and how abundant they are."
With that information, O'Neal said scientists can work to protect the bees' habitats and create Iowa's Bumble Bee Atlas.
It's part of a larger project to map the bees and foster bee development nationwide. Sign up online to volunteer.
The national project is part of a collaboration with the Xerces Society for Invertebrate Conservation.
Some 900 people have volunteered for the national atlas project, and counted more than 20,000 bumble bees - which O'Neal said face several major threats.
"Pesticide exposure, parasite and pathogens," said O'Neal, "and then the last 'P,' and probably the most important, is poor forage."
The researchers will work to alleviate those threats by knowing where the bees are.
Volunteers have discovered species thought to be gone from their states, contributed to new field guides, and improved scientists' understanding of bumble bee populations across the country.
get more stories like this via email
A coalition of conservation groups has sued the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service for refusing to relist wolves under the Endangered Species Act.
Helena-based Alliance for the Wild Rockies is part of the suit. The Alliance sued to successfully overturn the wolf's delisting in 2012 but the move fell victim to congressional funding bill negotiations.
Mike Garrity, executive director of the alliance, said the wolves clearly qualify to be protected under the Act and hunting is driving down their numbers, which could cause problems for the animals.
"As their numbers decline, they are at greater risk for inbreeding," Garrity pointed out. "Once inbreeding sets in, the population is sunk."
Livestock and cattle owners argued wolves are a threat to their flocks and herds and want their numbers reduced. The suit was filed in federal District Court in Missoula.
Beyond keeping a robust population of wolves on Montana's lands and helping their species thrive, Garrity noted wolves can also help reduce the population of diseased animals.
"We're starting to have disease in deer, such as Chronic Wasting Disease," Garrity explained. "Predators like wolves are really good at focusing on the sick animals, so that's an excellent way to control Chronic Wasting Disease."
Garrity added wolf management policies in Montana, Idaho and Wyoming, all of which allow aggressive hunting of the animals, fail to protect wolves and all native species for future generations, the primary mandate of the Endangered Species Act.
Disclosure: Alliance for the Wild Rockies contributes to our fund for reporting on Endangered Species & Wildlife, Environment. If you would like to help support news in the public interest,
click here.
get more stories like this via email
A lawsuit over a federal agency's decision not to boost wolf protections in New Mexico and other western states has been filed, days after video surfaced showing the torture of a captured wolf.
According to accounts, a Wyoming man ran the wolf down with a snowmobile in late February, disabling it. He then took it to a local bar and posed for photos before shooting it.
Erik Molvar, executive director of the Western Watersheds Project, said federal protections under the Endangered Species Act are essential because there are still those who don't respect wildlife.
"That's why wolves were driven extinct in the first place, is because these types of people were the ones who controlled the public policy discussion throughout much of the 20th century when wolves were driven extinct," he said.
In early February, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service declined to restore protections for gray wolves in western states. The agency said it concluded the animals weren't in danger of extinction under the Endangered Species Act.
The lawsuit was filed by the Western Environmental Law Center on behalf of Western Watersheds and a coalition of nine other conservation groups.
Molvar believes the federal agency's decision not to re-designate western wolves as "endangered" was profoundly misguided. He said some states such as New Mexico and Colorado have adopted extra penalties for killing wolves, but the Endangered Species Act lets hunters in other states off the hook if they claim it was a case of mistaken identity.
"There were special loopholes for Wyoming, Idaho and Montana - and also parts of Oregon, Washington and Utah - so it does beg the question of how often this is happening quietly and under the radar," he explained.
In Wyoming, wolves and coyotes, which are considered predators, aren't eligible for protections under the state's animal cruelty statute. To date, the only penalty inflicted on the person shown on social media tormenting the wolf was a $250 fine by the Wyoming Game and Fish Department.
Disclosure: Defenders of Wildlife contributes to our fund for reporting on Climate Change/Air Quality, Endangered Species & Wildlife, Energy Policy, Public Lands/Wilderness. If you would like to help support news in the public interest,
click here.
get more stories like this via email