Court Victory for Transgender Students
Wednesday, May 29, 2019
WASHINGTON - A decision by the U.S. Supreme Court is being hailed as a victory for transgender students in Pennsylvania and nationwide.
The nation's highest court on Tuesday said it won't hear the appeal of a case that upheld the Boyertown Area School District's policy of allowing transgender students to use restrooms that match their gender. The 2016 policy was challenged by a group of students who claimed the presence of transgender students in restrooms and locker rooms is a form of sexual harassment. That argument was rejected by a federal District Court and the Third Circuit Court of Appeals.
Mary Catherine Roper, deputy legal director of the ACLU of Pennsylvania, said the Supreme Court's decision allows that ruling to stand.
"What this means is that school districts do have the legal ability to protect transgender student rights," she said, "and we think, although it wasn't an issue in this case, they have the obligation to do that."
The appeals court said excluding transgender students from facilities other students use would increase the stigma and discrimination that transgender students already face.
Roper noted that allowing the appeals court ruling to stand should have important implications for other cases around the country in which the equal rights of transgender people are being challenged.
"The important principle from this case is that it doesn't hurt a cisgender person when you allow a transgender person to live according to their identity," she said.
Efforts to roll back transgender rights on the federal level also are being challenged.
The Trump administration wants to ban transgender people from military service, allow doctors to refuse to treat transgender patients, and allow discrimination in homeless shelters. Roper said Tuesday's Supreme Court decision sends a powerful message.
"Whatever the Trump administration says about federal policy," she said, "they can't stop a school district from doing the right thing."
She added that because the district court ruling was based on a preliminary record, the plaintiffs still can go back to that court and ask for a full trial.
More information is online at aclu.org.
get more stories like this via email
One of North Carolina's oldest Historically Black Colleges and Universities is finding new ways to help students stay enrolled and graduate. Recent …
A new survey finds 8 in 10 Kentucky parents say afterschool programs could help their child combat social and mental-health struggles by reducing unpr…
A technology that once existed only in science fiction soon could emerge as a viable solution to climate change. The city of Flagstaff has added …
A new report found Texas likely undercounted the number of people who actually live in the state when gathering information for the 2020 census…
Minnesota has more than 10,000 brownfield sites, which are abandoned or idled properties in need of contamination removal. State officials will soon …
By age 35, workers with a bachelor's degree or higher are about twice as likely as workers with just a high school diploma to have a good job - one …
The mayor of Huntington, where more than 200 homes were recently damaged by severe flooding, said now is the state's "one chance" to prevent other …
Alzheimer's disease is one of the leading causes of death in North Dakota, prompting state officials to launch an online dashboard, where the public …