PNS National Newscast

Audio Activation
"Siri, play the Public News Service (podcast)"
"Hey Google, play the Public News Service podcast"
"Alexa, play Public News Service podcast"
or "Alexa, what's my news flash?" once you set it up in the Alexa app

2020Talks

Audio Activation
"Siri, play the 2020Talks podcast"
"Hey Google, play the 2020Talks podcast"
"Alexa, play Two-Thousand-Twenty Talks podcast"
or "Alexa, what's my news flash?" once you set it up in the Alexa app

Newscasts

PNS Daily Newscast - September 28, 2020 


The New York Times reports President Trump's tax returns show chronic losses; and will climate change make it as a topic in the first presidential debate?


2020Talks - September 28, 2020 


The New York Times obtains President Trump's tax returns, showing chronic loss and debts coming due. And Judge Amy Coney Barrett is Trump's nominee to the U.S. Supreme Court.

Congressional Hearing Echoes MI Push to Regulate Facial Recognition Surveillance

The cities of Somerville, Mass., and San Francisco recently have forbidden local law enforcement from using facial-recognition surveillance.(Metamorworks/AdobeStock)
The cities of Somerville, Mass., and San Francisco recently have forbidden local law enforcement from using facial-recognition surveillance.(Metamorworks/AdobeStock)
July 11, 2019

LANSING, Mich. – Privacy advocates spoke out Wednesday at a hearing before the U.S. House of Representatives Committee on Homeland Security against the use of facial recognition technology by law enforcement.

It comes after revelations that both the FBI and Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) use a database of millions of Americans' drivers' license photos, including in states that allow undocumented immigrants to get a license.

Evan Greer, deputy director of the group Fight for the Future, says that amounts to millions of warrantless searches.

"So this is a really incredible bait and switch where people willingly gave their photos without consenting for those photos being searched or scanned for this purpose,” Greer points out. “And now the U.S. government is conducting essentially dragnet surveillance or analysis of those photos in order to target immigrants. "

Law enforcement officials argue that the technology could allow them to track the movements of people suspected of serious crimes, including terrorism. But privacy advocates say it undermines the presumption of anonymity in public and worry that some departments could use it to target protesters.

Advocates also note that the technology often misidentifies people and could lead police to approach an innocent person with guns drawn, raising the risk of violence.

The city of Detroit recently tabled a motion to use traffic cameras that can track faces. And Michigan state Rep. Isaac Robinson recently introduced a bill to put a five-year moratorium on the use of facial recognition surveillance by police.

Greer applauds the move, saying the technology is particularly unreliable when identifying African-American faces.

"This type of technology could eventually supercharge or automate racial profiling and discrimination,” he points out. “This system having an error could land an innocent person in prison, get someone deported, or targeted by the police."

California lawmakers are considering a bill to ban law enforcement statewide from using facial recognition or biometric surveillance, which identifies people by their tattoos or the way they walk.

Suzanne Potter, Public News Service - MI