LANSING, Mich. -- Virtual learning could prove to be a benefit for teaching Michigan kids about sexual health.
The Michigan Department of Education worked this summer on a series of sex-education webinars for educators.
Brittany Batell, program and engagement manager for the Michigan Organization on Adolescent Sexual Health, worked with the department and said teachers shared their findings that student engagement dropped when schools went virtual in the spring.
However, she said students in the schools that continued to teach sex-ed online didn't lose interest in the topics of health and relationships.
"Perhaps there is some comfort in confidentiality if they're not by their classmates," Batell said. "They don't have the sense that they're being 'watched,' or they don't have to worry about feeling awkward or embarrassed in the presence of others. So, they're engaging more than in-person."
Michigan school districts are required to teach about HIV and other communicable diseases; most districts also offer sex-ed courses.
Batell contends evidence-informed, age-appropriate and comprehensive sexual health education that is inclusive and affirming of all sexual identities should be taught, both during the pandemic and after.
Batell explained sex education is much more than 'the birds and the bees.' It covers healthy relationships, body autonomy, consent, hygiene and elements of social-emotional learning.
She believes this year is a unique opportunity to reinforce lessons on health and safety, given the parallels between COVID-19 and sexual health.
"There are topics like risk reduction and using barrier methods in order to mitigate risk of transmission of infection," Batell said. "And lessons about how we talk to others, about what activities we're comfortable with, and how we keep ourselves and others safe."
Since most teens already have the internet at their fingertips, Batell encourages teachers to discuss with students how they can safely research accurate sexual-health information online.
"Online communication spaces, texting, video chats, online dating apps; how can we teach kids how to effectively use those, and how they relate to healthy relationships and all those topic areas that come up in HIV and sex-ed?" Batell said.
She added another advantage to online sex-ed is parents can more easily see, and better reinforce, the lessons in their student's life.
Disclosure: The Michigan Organization on Adolescent Sexual Health contributes to our fund for reporting on Health Issues, LGBTQIA Issues, Reproductive Health, and Youth Issues. If you would like to help support news in the public interest,
click here.
get more stories like this via email
Illinois serves as a crucial access point for abortion services and sees the most out-of-state patients in the country.
Since Roe v. Wade was overturned in June 2022, Planned Parenthood of Illinois has seen the largest increase in abortion services than any other state. About 25% of its patients are from out-of-state.
Julie Uhal, program manager of strategic initiatives and impact measurement for Planned Parenthood of Illinois, said they planned for an initial surge but sustained high patient volume has strained their resources. She explained they saw up to a dozen out-of-state patients per month before Roe was overturned.
"We're seeing 800, 900, 1,000 out-of-state patients every single month," Uhal reported. "That hasn't changed. That's remained constant for three years now because abortion bans don't stop the need for abortion care. They just make it more difficult for people to access."
Uhal pointed out many out-of-state patients are uninsured or have insurance in other states which cannot be used in Illinois. Combined with rising health care costs, lower reimbursement rates and threats to Medicaid, she said Planned Parenthood faces financial difficulties, which have already forced them to close four clinics this year.
Planned Parenthood is the largest provider of sexual and reproductive health care in the state. More than 40% of local patients use Medicaid to cover the cost of services, which in addition to abortion care includes birth control, cancer screenings, STI treatment and prenatal and gender-affirming care. Without Medicaid funding, Planned Parenthood of Illinois said it would need about $16 million a year to continue providing services at its current rate.
"A lot of people don't realize that many Planned Parenthood clinics are in areas that are otherwise health care provider deserts for access," Uhal emphasized. "For a lot of people, going in for a birth control appointment might be the only time they see a doctor that year."
Uhal stressed the burden of accessing common health care continues to be placed on the patient since states banned abortion services. The recent Supreme Court ruling which set a precedent to allow states to exclude Planned Parenthood from Medicaid will only worsen the burden. She added helping patients to navigate emotional and logistic barriers to care has been just as important as providing them with care.
"One in four people that can get pregnant will have an abortion at some point in their lifetime," Uhal explained. "So it's really important for people to know that they're not alone. There shouldn't be as much shame and stigma surrounding this as there is."
Planned Parenthood of Illinois opened the Carbondale Health Center in 2023 to help meet the increased demand for services, particularly for patients traveling from the South. About 90% of patients there come from out-of-state.
get more stories like this via email
Abortion rights advocates in Kentucky are concerned as the Department of Health and Human Services has revoked a policy requiring hospitals to provide abortion care in emergency situations.
Known as the Emergency Medical Treatment and Labor Act, the rule offered federal protection for the procedure, particularly in Kentucky and other red states with near total abortion bans.
Tamarra Wieder, Kentucky state director for Planned Parenthood Alliance Advocates, said stripping away protection will be catastrophic for women in rural counties who already face barriers to care.
"We know in a state like Kentucky that people have already turned up at emergency rooms because of our abortion restrictions," Wieder pointed out. "Doctors have been forced to wait until patients were at life-threatening situations, sepsis, hemorrhage, before they are able to provide care."
According to the National Institutes of Health, pregnancy complications are the fifth-most common reason women of reproductive age visit the emergency room.
Weider added rural communities across the Commonwealth suffer the nation's worst family planning and sexual health outcomes and continue to struggle with access to safe and convenient obstetric and reproductive health care.
"I think it's really important to note that 57% of Kentucky's rural hospitals no longer offer obstetric services, 57%," Weider emphasized.
Kentucky's Human Life Protection Act, passed by lawmakers in 2019, banned all abortions except to save the life of the mother and it went into effect immediately after the Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade in 2022. The same year, voters in the Commonwealth rejected a ballot measure which would have amended the state constitution to explicitly deny the right to an abortion.
get more stories like this via email
Arizona doctors have filed a lawsuit to overturn a set of restrictions which they argue interfere with access to abortion care. Arizona voters last year passed Proposition 139 which enshrined the fundamental right to an abortion, up until fetal viability, in the state's constitution.
Gail Deady, senior attorney, Center for Reproductive Rights, which is representing some of the plaintiffs in the case, explained that the abortion rights that were secured because of the measure do not go into effect automatically, and existing laws that limit access must be challenged before they can be struck down under Prop 139.
"This lawsuit is intended to honor the will of the voters and it looks to strike down the most onerous abortion restrictions that are currently on the books in Arizona," she said. "The theory behind this case is that these restrictions do not have any medical basis, they do not make abortions safer."
Deady explained that some of the restrictions include forcing doctors to turn away patients if they suspect a fetal genetic diagnosis is the reason for a patient seeking care, requiring patients to wait at least 24 hours before obtaining abortion care, and banning the use of telehealth for abortion. Mailing abortion pills - like mifepristone - is also prohibited. Conservative, anti-abortion advocates have expressed support for the restrictions, its's unclear if they'll oppose the lawsuit.
Deady argues many Arizonans are facing negative consequences as a result of the laws. She adds that it also means a delay in receiving the care most Arizonans supported last year, and added that Arizona has what she calls a "two-trip" law which requires patients make two separate visits to a clinic.
"Just to hear mandatory, state-scripted information about abortion that often is not medically correct, it spreads misinformation and is designed to make people feel ashamed of the decision that they've made which has now been recognized as a constitutional right in Arizona," she explained.
Deady said her organization is currently advocating for the restrictions to be blocked during litigation. The state attorney generals' office is currently examining the complaint.
get more stories like this via email