MADISON, Wis. - In the wake of the shooting incident in Ferguson, Missouri early this morning, more eyes may turn to Wisconsin and its similar troubles. Just under a year ago, Wisconsin became the first state in the nation to pass a law that forbids police agencies from investigating incidents themselves when an officer shoots and kills someone.
Assembly Democrat Chris Taylor of Madison co-authored the law. Now, with the killing last week of an unarmed, 19-year-old black man in Madison by a city police officer, the law has come into play again, and the state Division of Criminal Investigation (DCI) is in charge of the investigation.
According to Taylor, the new law got off to a rough start.
"I wasn't that satisfied with some of those early investigations," Taylor says. "Because I think it revealed that DCI, which was the independent agency called in to do the investigation, really wasn't in charge, particularly in the Milwaukee case of Dontre Hamilton. But there's no excuse now."
Taylor is also a member of the Joint Committee on Finance, which last week heard testimony from Attorney General Brad Schimel requesting more money to hire staff to conduct these independent investigations. Taylor says in the state's $70 billion budget, the money is there.
"I absolutely am confident we can provide the funds necessary, if people are willing to make some different choices," she says. "The money is there, it's just been allocated differently. So, what I'll be advocating for is that we provide the money that the Department of Justice needs."
Taylor believes the new law will work in the Madison shooting last week, but says it isn't the solution to concerns about police shootings of unarmed black men.
"There are other things we can do to make sure the process is as fair as possible, and the investigation that we get is as thorough and independent as possible," she says. "The law we have here in Wisconsin was just one little first step towards that, frankly."
In the Madison police shooting case last Friday, Taylor says she is confident DCI will conduct an independent and thorough investigation. She adds she is hopeful the new law will give the independent investigation process a chance to work, so the families of the people involved and the community will get the answers they need.
get more stories like this via email
A new Washington law ensures employees quick access to their personnel files, which are necessary for many things including filing for workers' compensation and unemployment claims.
Employers must now provide copies of the files when requested within 21 days or face possible legal action.
Jesse Wing, an employment attorney in Seattle, noted under the old law, many employers ignored or restricted requests.
"There are even employers who are located in a different part of the state who say, 'if you want to drive here, you can sit in our conference room and look at the documents but you can't have a copy of them, we won't send them to you.' Which also can cause a lot of problems for employees who have disabilities,'" Wing explained.
Wing noted the new law took seven years to pass, largely because the business community voiced concerns about time-consuming document searches and possible sensitive employee information in the files. He countered digital files make retrieval quick and legally, employees already have access to their records.
Wing added a flood of lawsuits is unlikely under the new law, as they would offer little payoff and employers can avoid them simply by complying.
"What we really want is our clients to be able to get the documents that they need for all the myriad reasons that they need them," Wing stressed.
Wing pointed out the new law only applies to employees working in the private sector. Public employees have another mechanism to obtain their files. Although, he said, there have been problems with that system as well, so follow-up legislation may be needed.
get more stories like this via email
A groundbreaking radio show from the early 1990s is returning this weekend in Arkansas. The PHAT LIP! You(th)Talk Radio show will be back on the airwaves Saturday on KABF 88.3 FM Community Radio in Little Rock.
The show, produced by Washitaw Foothills Youth Media Arts and Literacy Collective, features young people ages 16 to 24.
Director Kwami Abdul-Bey says the broadcast gives teens and young adults a chance to express their feelings about a variety of topics.
"We want all young people involved in the conversation, so you'll be hearing what they have to say particularly as it has to deal with civic engagement and electoral justice," he said.
The show will air from 3 p.m. to 5 p.m. the first and third Saturday of each month, and is also available on KABF.org and through the Shortwave Relay Service.
The talk show is funded by a three-year grant. Some of the topics the students want to address are medical and student debt and funding cuts for social programs.
Jasmine Serrano, a show host, is a junior at Jacksonville High School in Jacksonville, and said she got involved with the project after speaking to members of the Arkansas Legislature.
"In society, we always look at the adults and we always look at the older folks and generations, but we don't really take the time to pay attention to how the current policies and societal perceptions are impacting youth," Serrano explained.
When Abdul-Bey started the original show in 1994, he said it was in response to a documentary that painted Arkansas youth in a bad light. His seventh-grade social studies students wanted to combat the negative stereotypes. He noted the name of the show reflects the music of the times.
"One of my favorite hip-hop artists back in the 1990s was Fat Lip from Digable Planets," he continued. "And 'pfat' at the time was something that was cool, something that was vital as far as the culture was concerned. And 'lip' just means you talk too much."
Disclosure: Washitaw Foothills Youth Media Arts and Literacy Collective contributes to our fund for reporting on Civic Engagement, Education, Social Justice, Youth Issues. If you would like to help support news in the public interest,
click here.
get more stories like this via email
Reports of the Trump administration considering taxing wealthy Americans to pay for mass deportations and other priorities come on the heels of a new study showing how the move could generate significant revenues without slowing economic growth.
Mary Eschelbach Hansen, associate professor of economics at American University and the report's co-author, said raising tax rates for people who earn more than $609,000 a year to 44% would add 3% to the nation's tax coffers, enough to stave off cuts to popular programs serving low-income Coloradans.
"In current budget proportions, that's about enough to pay for some of the biggest, most important programs like food stamps SNAP, Children's Health Insurance Program, and also Temporary Assistance for Needy Families," Eschelbach Hansen outlined.
While 44% may seem high compared to today's top rate of 37%, it is a lot less than the 92% paid by people who earned more than $400,000 a year under Republican President Dwight D. Eisenhower. Republicans have long argued tax cuts create economic benefits for all, and leaders in Congress, including Rep. Mike Johnson, R-La., the House Speaker, have said they would oppose any tax hikes.
Eschelbach Hansen argued raising the top tax rate would also increase how much of the national income pie most Americans get to keep, compared to how much the wealthiest get, by about 2%. She added years of trickle-down economics have shown only the wealthy benefit from low tax rates.
"If lowering top tax rates was going to trickle down, then you and I would be much richer than we are now," Eschelbach Hansen pointed out. "Because we have had an era of low top tax rates for decades."
Eschelbach Hansen stressed higher personal tax rates have virtually no impact on long-term economic growth, and lower personal tax rates lead to less economic growth, because people tend to take advantage of the lower rate by moving their income.
"Instead of reinvesting it in your business, where it will grow your business and grow the economy, you'll be more likely to just take it as personal income, which is not going to stimulate growth," Eschelbach Hansen explained.
get more stories like this via email