CHARLESTON, W. Va. - As West Virginia lawmakers debate a so-called right-to-work bill, critics charge it's designed to undermine a basic source of middle-class jobs.
Supporters admit that the half of states with the laws have lower average wages. But they argue those states, many in the south, also have lower costs of living. Unions and the laws' opponents argue that's the same as saying those states have lower standards of living and less union power to protect the middle class.
Steve Meador has long worked for Kroger in Roanoke, Virginia, a right-to-work state.
He says he gets paid a lot less than a similar Kroger worker here.
"Big time difference," says Meador. "Same job, and the people here, because they're a non-right-to-work state, make more money. It's almost $2 an hour more."
Without a right-to-work law, everyone covered by a union contract has to pay for the cost of keeping the contract in place. They don't have to pay for other union activities, such as political contributions. With a right-to-work law, an employee is free not to pay any kind of union dues.
Jonathan Williams, communications manager for Meador's union with United Food and Commercial Workers in Virginia, says that takes away funding for important union functions, such as safety and grievance committees. He points to the case of a long-time meat cutter working on a faulty saw.
"As she was slicing meat, it slipped and her hand went into the saw," says Williams. "She almost lost her finger. She feels very strongly that if she wasn't a member of the union, she might have just been fired on the spot."
Supporters say the laws increase job growth by reducing the power of unions. Economists strongly disagree as to whether that is true or not. But Meador says the right-to-work arguments often are built on a false assumption about how unions work where the laws are not in place.
"Anybody can be not a part of the union, if they don't want to be a part of it," Meador says. "You just have to pay the dues to get the services. They don't get something for nothing."
Last week, the right-to-work bill, Senate Bill 1, passed the Senate Judiciary Committee on a party-line vote.
get more stories like this via email
Coaches in the Renton School District, just south of Seattle, are organizing with the American Federation of Teachers to fight for what they say are "fair wages" in their first union contract.
Buddy Ryan, head boys track and field coach at Hazen High School, said Renton coaches get paid much less compared with neighboring school districts, which contributes to a 45% turnover rate in coaches from year to year.
"I'm not expecting to go buy a new car off a season of coaching, but I'm not expecting to make minimum wage to be responsible for all these kids," he said. "I think the reality is, a fair wage for a fair day's work is what everybody looks for."
Renton School District has proposed a 2.5% wage increase, far below what the coaches asked for. AFT has said the district has the funds to pay coaches fairly. The district did not respond to a request for comment.
Ryan said the low pay and high turnover rate costs the district more money in training and degrades the quality of the sports programs.
"And then what's the cost to the kids that get a different coach every year? Well, you know what ends up happening? These parents get tired of it and they take their kids to private schools, or they move and transfer them to other schools," he said.
Ryan noted that sports, along with other extracurriculars such as band, are what motivate many kids to keep their grades up in order to participate. He said the district should want to keep the programs strong.
"It's just like when you're a kid at dinner," he said, "and your parents say, 'You've got to eat your vegetables or you don't get dessert.' Well, that dessert is the after-school activities."
Disclosure: American Federation of Teachers of Washington contributes to our fund for reporting on Budget Policy & Priorities, Early Childhood Education, Education, Livable Wages/Working Families. If you would like to help support news in the public interest,
click here.
get more stories like this via email
Nevada groups concerned about affordability, clean air and health care are speaking out against the "One Big Beautiful Bill Act" recently signed by President Donald Trump.
The new law extends tax cuts from 2017, funded partially by huge cuts to Medicaid and SNAP food benefits.
Dr. Joanne Leovy, steering committee chair for the Nevada Clinicians for Climate Action, noted it also ends the tax credit for electric vehicles on Sept. 30, which drives up the price of an EV by $7,500 while promoting the sales of gas-powered vehicles.
"This bill will dump an extra 2.1 billion tons of climate pollution into the atmosphere over the next decade," Leovy pointed out. "Increasing greenhouse gas emissions by about 7% over prior projections; the equivalent of adding more than 400,000 cars to the road."
The new law also cuts tax credits for rooftop solar and energy efficient home upgrades. Backers said the savings were necessary to fund other administration priorities, such as increased funding for immigration enforcement.
Yolanda Kemp, a member of the American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees Local 4041, said she worries about job losses in the public sector.
"When states, cities, towns, and schools lose essential federal funding, they will be forced to make cuts to their budgets as well, putting all public services and jobs at risk of being cut," Kemp stressed. "And let me tell you, the 'Big, Beautiful Bill' that is supposed to help hardworking Americans is nothing more than another billionaire giveaway paid for by us."
The change to Medicaid and SNAP are not immediate but will be phased in mostly in 2027 and 2028.
get more stories like this via email
More than 1,100 caregivers at Portland's Providence St. Vincent Medical Center have voted to unionize, joining the Service Employees International Union Local 49.
Hospital staffers, including certified nursing assistants, cooks, lab assistants, pharmacy techs, environmental workers and patient representatives, will soon begin collective bargaining with management over a new work contract.
Finn McCool, senior food service attendant at Providence St. Vincent Medical Center in Portland, said changes to working conditions in the hospital were a major driver to organize.
"There's a lot that makes St. Vincent a great place to work, but we've also seen just tons of changes over the years around staffing and benefits," McCool explained. "My fellow caregivers really knew that jobs were only going to get harder."
The St. Vincent caregivers will join thousands of other unionized workers at Providence hospitals in Oregon, Washington state and other parts of the country. Providence officials released a statement, recognizing the union and saying they were prepared to work with it toward a new contract.
McCool noted the company made several changes to staffing and work policies without feedback from its employees, with changes to the employees' health care benefits causing a major upheaval.
"It's been a recent change to our health care plan with Aetna switching over, and that was probably a very large reason why a lot of us decided to vote yes," McCool pointed out. "We had our own internal health care system. We changed to a different thing. Co-pays changed. Things were definitely a lot harder with increased deductibles."
McCool stressed political uncertainty, particularly in the government's health care policies, was also a significant concern.
"We're seeing a lot of changes going on with the government with cuts, especially right now," McCool observed. "What threatens us is cuts to Medicare and Medicaid. Our CEO said, 'These cuts are threatening the hospital.'"
Disclosure: SEIU Local 49 contributes to our fund for reporting on Livable Wages/Working Families, and Social Justice. If you would like to help support news in the public interest,
click here.
get more stories like this via email