AUSTIN, Texas — In a 5-3 ruling Monday, the U.S. Supreme Court struck down key parts of a Texas law that severely restricted how abortion clinics could operate.
The ruling, which was hailed as a major milestone by pro-abortion groups, removed medical practice regulations on abortion clinics so restrictive that half of the clinics in the state have been forced to close their doors since the law was enacted in 2013.
According to Heather Busby, executive director of NARAL Pro-Choice Texas, the outcome was the result of a long, hard fight.
"This is a tremendous victory for the health and safety of not just people in Texas but across the nation,” Busby said. "We feel vindicated because we knew from the beginning this law was a complete sham, and the reasons they were trying to pass it were complete lies."
The decision, written by Justice Stephen Breyer, found the Texas law placed an "undue burden" on women seeking an abortion. Justice Anthony Kennedy was the swing vote in the decision.
Texas Lt. Gov. Dan Patrick, author of state House bill 2, issued a statement condemning the ruling and vowing to continue to fight for anti-abortion issues.
The law had required all clinics in Texas to meet the same standards as ambulatory surgical centers and required clinic doctors to have admitting privileges at nearby hospitals. Busby said the cost of complying with the regulations meant that many clinics had to close, forcing some women to drive hundreds of miles further - even to neighboring states or Mexico - to seek care.
"Right now, I'm standing in a clinic here in Austin that was forced to close and could potentially reopen,” Busby said. "But it's not going to be an easy road to undo this damage."
Legal experts believe the court's ruling could jeopardize similar laws in other states, opening other restrictive regulations on abortion to legal challenges.
get more stories like this via email
Summer will be here before you know it, and experts say now is the time to get prepared for Arizona's scorching and life-threatening temperatures.
Some 645 heat-associated deaths were confirmed by Maricopa County's Department of Public Health in 2023, breaking the previous year's record by more than 50%.
Dr. Rebecca Sunenshine, the health department's medical director, said the 2023 Heat Related Deaths Report demonstrates this is a significant public health concern for Arizona's most populous county.
"This is really a call to action," she said, "to make sure that we all come together across the county - community-based organizations, cities, the county government - to prevent these deaths almost all of which are preventable."
In 2023, an average of 13 heat related deaths per day occurred during July, with people who were unhoused making up the largest proportion. With hotter months on the way, Sunenshine encouraged Arizonans to check on neighbors and seniors who may live alone, make sure air conditioning systems are working and follow the county's "10 tips" to stay safe in the heat.
In addition to tracking heat-related deaths, the Department of Public Health also conducted an evaluation of cooling and respite centers that were part of Maricopa County's Heat Relief Network last year. Sunenshine said they learned valuable details - including that two-thirds of respondents didn't have a stable home, and that many people found the cooling centers only through roadside signs advertising them.
"Some of the biggest barriers to accessing cooling centers are not knowing they exist, not knowing where they're located and not having transportation," she said, "and we based all our actions this upcoming summer on the results of this cooling center evaluation."
She said they were able to establish a call center, operated by bilingual community health workers, to help connect people not only to heat-relief resources but to energy and security-assistance programs.
Arizonans can call 211 to help find transportation to the nearest heat-relief location, when they open again on May 1.
get more stories like this via email
This week, an Alabama group is drawing attention to the need for Medicaid expansion.
Currently, approximately 300,000 people are stuck in a health care coverage gap, earning too much for Medicaid but not enough for private insurance.
Debbie Smith, Cover Alabama campaign director for Alabama Arise, said they are reaching out to legislators statewide and sharing information about the stakes involved.
"About 19 of our rural hospitals are at risk of immediate closure," Smith reported. "That means they are at risk of closing in the next year. And having patients that come in that don't have health insurance coverage is not good for their bottom lines."
The Cover Alabama Coalition is engaging lawmakers through meetings in their districts and encouraging residents to share their experiences and thoughts on Medicaid expansion via social media. Although 19 rural hospitals are due for immediate closure, a report on rural hospitals from advisory firm Chartis highlighted more could be at risk in the long run. The report revealed nearly 74% of Alabama's rural hospitals are operating at a loss.
Smith sees Medicaid expansion as a life-or-death matter, which can greatly enhance the quality of life for many residents. She noted it would provide access to preventive care and vital medications, and can help people enter or remain in the workforce. She pointed out the current Medicaid threshold creates barriers for families in need.
"Let's say a single mom with two kids, she can't make more than $4,656 a year and still qualify for Medicaid unless she has a disability or is pregnant," Smith observed. "And at the other end of the perspective, they have to make at least around $25,000 to qualify for the health insurance marketplace."
She added the expansion could also benefit around 5,000 veterans who lack coverage. Currently, 41 states including District of Columbia, have already expanded Medicaid. Mississippi has also recently passed legislation in its House, it is now waiting for a Senate vote.
Disclosure: Alabama Arise contributes to our fund for reporting on Budget Policy & Priorities, Health Issues, and Poverty Issues. If you would like to help support news in the public interest,
click here.
get more stories like this via email
On Tuesday, Care4All California, a coalition fighting for affordable health care, unveiled a package of bills its members say they would like state lawmakers to pass.
Assembly Bill 3129 would give the California Attorney General the power to accept, reject or modify health care transactions involving private equity or hedge funds.
Asm. Jim Wood, D-Healdsburg, Assembly Speaker Pro Tempore and author of the bill, said mergers often improve the corporate bottom line but lead to higher prices for patients.
"We're often led to believe these consolidations will save money, that it's good for consumers," Wood observed. "But what we're actually seeing in health care is just the opposite, and it reduces competition."
Opponents said the bill would give government officials too much power. Care4All California also endorsed bills to help the state enforce requirements around implicit bias training for women's health providers in an attempt to make sure patient complaints are taken seriously and to reduce the number of people of color who die from pregnancy complications.
Asm. Laura Friedman, D-Glendale, is behind Assembly Bill 2297, which she said aims to make sure people do not lose their homes due to medical debt.
"A loophole allows debt collectors to place liens on patients' homes to collect unpaid medical debt," Friedman pointed out. "AB 2297 closes that loophole, and prohibits liens on property when collecting medical debt from financially qualified patients."
Another bill in the package would allow a 12-month grace period to cover people who qualify for Medi-Cal but were kicked off due to an administrative issue.
get more stories like this via email