A menos de un año de las elecciones presidenciales de 2024, los expertos electorales de Nevada ven una serie de amenazas que podrían afectar a los votantes, desde la desinformación hasta los esfuerzos de supresión de votos. Por eso enfatizan que es importante conocer sus derechos. La directora ejecutiva de Silver State Voices, Emily Persaud-Zamora, dice que Nevada tiene tres elecciones el próximo año: las primarias de preferencia presidencial en febrero, las primarias en junio y las elecciones generales a principios de noviembre. Si tiene al menos 18 años y ha sido residente de Nevada durante al menos 30 días, puede votar. Persaud-Zamora explica que no tendrá que mostrar una identificación, a menos que sea votante por primera vez, y no se trata solo de la carrera presidencial.
"Se acercan las elecciones presidenciales y es muy importante. Ya sabes, están sucediendo muchas cosas en este momento con la junta escolar. ¿Tienes una opinión sobre eso? Algunas de esas personas se presentarán a elecciones. Por lo tanto, asegúrese de estar registrado para poder hacer oír su voz sobre esos temas en particular," enfatizó Persaud-Zamora.
Agrega que donar tiempo a grupos que trabajan para proteger el proceso democrático puede marcar una gran diferencia. Su organización ayuda a administrar el Programa de Protección Electoral no partidista e insiste que siempre están buscando voluntarios. También sugiere donar a organizaciones sin fines de lucro que trabajan para involucrar a los votantes en comunidades marginadas.
Kerry Durmick es la directora del estado de Nevada para All Voting is Local (Todo voto es local). Ella menciona que en la última sesión legislativa se aprobaron dos leyes de acceso al voto que impactan directamente a las naciones tribales. La SB 216 exige lo que Durmick llama "mejor comunicación" entre las naciones tribales de Nevada y los funcionarios electorales, garantizando un mejor acceso a los lugares de votación y al voto. Y la SB 327 agiliza el establecimiento de lugares de votación y buzones de votación en las reservas.
"Realmente aumentamos los lugares de votación basados en reservas, de dos lugares de votación en 2019 a 17 en 2022. Y con suerte, en 2024 veremos aun más, gracias a algunos de estos proyectos de ley que se convirtieron en ley," analizó Durmick.
Durmick además agrega que es necesario trabajar más para garantizar el acceso lingüístico al votar. La AB 246 habría hecho precisamente eso, pero fue vetada por el gobernador Joe Lombardo. Desde entonces, el condado de Clark acordó traducir materiales al chino para las tres elecciones en 2024.
Apoyo para esta historia fue proporcionado por la Carnegie Corporation of New York
Nota Aclaratoria: Silver State Voices contribuye a nuestro fondo para informar sobre políticas y prioridades presupuestarias, participación cívica, cuestiones de salud, derechos humanos y justicia racial. Si desea ayudar a respaldar noticias de interés público,
haga clic aquí.
get more stories like this via email
North Dakota's June 11 primary is inching closer and those running for legislative seats are trying to win over voters, including Native American candidates who are part of a movement energized by newly drawn political boundaries.
The organization North Dakota Native Vote said there are seven candidates with Indigenous roots seeking spots in the Legislature. Most are running in District 9, which was recently updated to reflect representation needs for two Native American tribes.
Natasha Gourd, a board member of North Dakota Native Vote, described them as a good mixture of candidates coming from both reservations in the area, with some running as Democrats and others as Republicans.
"We've seen an upturn in participation and just getting leadership development through Native candidates," Gourd observed.
The election wave comes after the state saw 10 Native candidates in legislative races two years ago. For her group, Gourd acknowledged the boost can be tricky because they cannot endorse everyone running. But she noted having greater assurances the areas will be represented by people from their community -- no matter if they have a different stance on certain issues -- is still a positive.
Gourd added trying to build on the momentum is also important for off-reservation districts.
"What they do at the state level, regardless of Native American people in North Dakota (being part of) federally recognized tribes, it does affect us," Gourd pointed out. "Most Natives in North Dakota do live off the reservation, so it does affect our populations."
Gourd stressed they need more Native voices at the state level speaking out about priorities within education, the housing crisis, energy issues and health care. She hopes the positive trends they're seeing inspire more civic participation among other racial and ethnic groups trying to get a seat at the policy table in North Dakota.
Disclosure: North Dakota Native Vote contributes to our fund for reporting on Civic Engagement, Housing/Homelessness, Livable Wages/Working Families, and Native American Issues. If you would like to help support news in the public interest,
click here.
get more stories like this via email
A new poll finds a near 20-year low in the number of voters who say they have a high interest in the 2024 election, with a majority saying they hold negative views of both President Joe Biden and former President Donald Trump. A group of Arizona elections officials and experts recently gathered to discuss the growing discontent with the state's current electoral landscape.
Stephen Richer, Maricopa County Recorder, said that if politicians are what he calls "single-minded seekers of re-election," he contends the state should change the political incentive structure.
"And if those incentives will change, then maybe we will be talking about more things in the Arizona Voter's Agenda and less things that are currently right now incentivized by what I still believe to be a minority, but a very passionate, very loud, and a minority that is definitely committed to acting on those issues," he said.
Richer added it is important to remember that despite Independent and unaffiliated voters being able to participate in the July 30th statewide primary, they were excluded from the state's March Presidential Preference Election, and that has caught the eye of some in the state. The bipartisan group Make Elections Fair Arizona is pushing for open primaries, but proponents of closed primaries believe they're crucial to maintaining the integrity of party ideals.
Amanda Burke, executive vice president with the non-partisan, nonprofit organization Center for the Future of Arizona, said more than half of unaffiliated voters do not feel they have leaders or candidates running who speak to the issues and causes they care about. She contends that then translates to who decides to show up at the ballot box and vote, and encourages Arizonans to imagine a different primary system if they want different outcomes.
"Otherwise we are going to continue to have some more outcomes in terms of people who are incentivized to speak to a small percentage of their base on either side who are really not representative of the larger views," she explained.
The Grand Canyon State allows voter-initiated amendments to the state constitution, but the Arizona Require Partisan Primary Elections Amendment would add the state's current primary practice to the state constitution, prohibiting future changes without another constitutional amendment. Make Elections Fair Arizona is still collecting signatures to get its measure on the November ballot.
get more stories like this via email
Wisconsin women have made progress in closing gaps when it comes to being elected to public office.
But some voices worry the movement might slow down as candidates see increasing levels of threats and harassment.
The Brennan Center for Justice recently issued findings that detail the threatening behavior those in the political arena are experiencing now.
Women were three to four times as likely as men to experience abuse targeting their gender.
Erin Vilardi, CEO and founder of the advocacy and assistance group Vote Run Lead, said this creates more unfairness in areas such as resource planning for a campaign.
"We see women candidates and incumbents right now having to pay for security," said Vilardi, "having to put in their budgets, in their campaign funds, in their line-items for their campaigns a security detail."
And Vilardi said because of the worsening climate, the threats are extending to almost all other candidates, including conservative white men.
She and other researchers called on party leaders to strongly condemn political violence. They also recommend that each state implement stronger protection for officeholders.
Vilardi said it's not just women candidates and incumbents having to deal with this behavior. Women working as top aides and political journalists are subject to more hateful rhetoric these days.
"This is something that permeates women in politics," said Vilardi, "not just for the folks that are stepping up to lead but for the ecosystem of women around them."
And if more women decide not to run or seek re-election as a result, Vilardi said this means there will be fewer opportunities for gender equality in leadership positions in state legislatures and Congress.
She urged constituents to send messages of support to women officeholders as they weigh these challenges and their political futures.
Support for this reporting was provided by the Carnegie Corporation of New York.
get more stories like this via email