The New York HEAT Act is again making its way through the state Legislature. The bill aims to phase out gas-line extension allowances and gives the Public Service Commission authority to keep utility companies in line with the state's climate laws.

In previous years, the bill has gotten far, clearing the Senate chamber in 2023. Much of the bill is in Gov. Kathy Hochul's 2025 budget proposal.

Anshul Gupta, policy and research director with New Yorkers for Clean Power, contends gas utilities are spreading misinformation about the bill.

"The most common one is that our electrical infrastructure, our electrical grid, cannot handle the load of shifting the heating, space and water heating, from gas to electricity," Gupta said.

He noted this stems from a report showing the electrical grid could have trouble meeting summer peak loads. Though it's more than able to handle the winter, downstate summer peak use is left to peaker plants. But these are slowly going away.

Gupta said in the next decade, New York's winter peak isn't expected to exceed the summer, and by then the electrical grid could handle that load.

Gupta believes building decarbonization and generating zero-emission electricity are other energy policies New York should be focusing on. The state has worked hard on its climate goals, but he's uncertain if it can achieve them on time.

"Right now, it doesn't look like we're on track to meet those goals, and we need to double down on ensuring that we have enough offshore wind and transmission as well as onshore wind and solar generation in the pipeline," Gupta continued.

He added these projects need to continue being built instead of lingering in development. But some offshore wind projects in New York were cancelled because the company's contracts were negotiated before construction costs rose during the pandemic.

Now, some reports find that unless those issues are resolved, the state might not achieve its 2030 climate goals.

After being debated for days, Sen. Mike Lee, R-Utah, and Sen. John Curtis, R-Utah, are among those who voted to advance the "One Big Beautiful Bill Act" to push President Donald Trump's agenda forward.

Curtis was one of a handful of Republicans who wanted to preserve clean energy tax credits but the Senate made major cuts to tax incentives for wind and solar projects. Now, the bill does not allow for a project to get the tax credit if it does not begin producing electricity by 2028.

Sean Gallagher, senior vice president of policy for the Solar Energy Industries Association, said the change could reverse years of progress and innovation.

"It has really devastating impacts," Gallagher emphasized. "Not just to the solar industry, but to American energy security and national security. Solar energy is putting more new power on the grid than every other fuel source combined in the last several years."

Curtis was able to remove a provision that would've enacted a new tax on solar and wind projects and ended a ban on solar leasing. While Curtis expressed gratitude to Senate leaders for including his changes, Gallagher hopes the concessions do not hinder the industry's ability to meet demand. The budget bill now goes back to the U.S. House for what could be the final vote.

Projects started before the bill is enacted would be protected from penalties and setbacks. Current projects would also retain all of their tax-credit value through December 2027. Gallagher argued the tax credits, passed under the Inflation Reduction Act, are working.

"Every dollar spent on clean energy tax credits has a $2.67 return in the form of lower energy costs for consumers, and taxes paid by clean energy infrastructure projects, mostly property taxes," Gallagher pointed out.

The Trump administration has called for energy dominance and so far has focused on supporting more development of fossil fuels over renewable energy. And while wind and solar energy are still popular across the board, recent polling indicates some people, especially Republicans, are less supportive of renewable energy than in Trump's first term.


get more stories like this via email

Groups representing workers in the renewable power sector are slamming the possible repeal of clean-energy tax credits in the "One Big Beautiful Bill Act" currently before the U.S. Senate.

The bill would repeal tax credits for solar and electric cars, part of President Joe Biden's Inflation Reduction Act.

Bob Keefe, executive director of E2, a national organization of business leaders who advocate for smart clean-energy policies, said the bill could crush the clean-energy economy and not just in blue states such as California.

"If we ever wanted a policy in this country that would kill jobs, reduce business investments and make us less competitive, while also reducing our electricity supplies in this country, we've got it," Keefe contended.

In the past three years, companies have announced more than $130 billion in clean energy projects. Trump campaigned against the tax credits and wants to put the savings toward an extension of his 2017 tax cuts. A new report from E2 showed since Trump took office in January, companies have canceled more than $15 billion worth of projects.

Keefe pointed out California has the most clean energy jobs in the country, so it has the most to lose.

"There are more than a half a million Californians who work in clean energy, solar, wind, energy efficiency, electric vehicles," Keefe reported. "When you take away a 30% tax credit for building solar projects, sales are naturally going to decrease, projects are going to get canceled and jobs are going to be impacted."

Data show more than 75,000 Californians work in the electric vehicle industry. The bill eliminates the $7,500 EV tax credit which makes EVs more affordable. If the bill passes it would have to be reconciled with the House version and reapproved before it reaches the President.

Federal tax credits for electric vehicles are helping drive clean transportation in the Lehigh Valley, but advocates warn they're at risk of being cut by the budget reconciliation bill being heard in Congress.

Supporters say the credits lower emissions, grow the economy, and save Pennsylvanians money.

Sarah DeGrendel, sustainability manager with the City of Bethlehem, urged Pennsylvania lawmakers to oppose any efforts to eliminate the EV and charging tax credits and vital EV manufacturing investments.

"Bethlehem has committed to reducing our overall transportation emissions by 30% by 2030, with an overall goal reduction of emissions by 33% by 2025 and 60% by 2030," said DeGrendel. "This is a journey to route zero, and it is one we are pursuing with a purpose."

The federal EV tax credit is worth up to $7,500 and is currently available through 2033. In Congress, senators are divided over whether to keep the Biden-era tax credits.

The budget bill passed in the House and is currently under consideration in the Senate.

Tony Bandiero, executive director of the Eastern Pennsylvania Alliance for Clean Transportation, said Pennsylvania has over 139,000 electric vehicles on the road.

He said he believes federal EV tax credits are helping to boost the economy.

"We have seen double digit growth of EV sales year over year in the US," said Bandiero, "which is being driven by federal EV tax credits bolstering manufacturing sectors, and ensuring growing long term job stability for clean energy workers and suppliers."

Andrea Wittchen, president of the Lehigh Valley Sustainability Network, stressed the importance of federal investments in electric vehicles for public health.

She noted that the transportation sector is the largest source of carbon pollution nationally, and the second largest in Pennsylvania.

"In 2024 for the second year in a row," said Wittchen, "the Asthma and Allergy Foundation of America identified Allentown as the number one worst place to live in the United States for people who suffer from asthma and allergies."

Wittchen also pointed out that electric vehicles have zero tailpipe emissions, and they drastically reduce air pollution caused by tailpipe emissions from fossil fuel cars and trucks.

She noted that cleaner air and healthier communities result from zero tailpipe pollution.




get more stories like this via email