Las familias de California podrían terminar pagando unos 300 dólares más al año por su seguro médico, si se hacen efectivos los recortes que se quieren aplicar al presupuesto estatal en materia de salud.

Y mientras el debate sigue en el Capitolio estatal, un estudio reciente señala que la reducción que se pretende hacer a programas como Medi-Cal o Healthy Families (Familias Saludables) tendrán un "Efecto Dominó" sobre todos los californianos.

El dato es claro: si a esos programas de asistencia médica se les recorta casi un billón de dólares, las familias californianas que cuentan con seguro médico serán las que compensen esta diferencia. Y es que, como lo advierte el autor del estudio, Peter Harbage, de Harbage Consulting (Harbage Consultores), cuando haces una reducción al presupuesto de asistencia en salud, alguien la paga.

"Trasladar costos es un fenómeno que se ha estudiado y examinado ampliamente, y eso sucederá, que este costo pasará a las familias californianas si se recorta el Medi-Cal."

Según la investigación de Harbage, la reducción provocaría también la pérdida de dos billones de dólares en negocios y casi 17 mil empleos. Estima que 15 condados perderán más de 30 millones de dólares, con un mayor impacto en Central Valley (Valle Central). El Gobernador Schwarzenegger propone endurecer los requisitos para ingresar a Medi-Cal y bajar los reembolsos a los proveedores de servicios de salud. Los legisladores de California negocian un plan de egresos para compensar el déficit estatal de 15 billones de dólares. El presupuesto era para el primero de Julio.

Anthony Wright, de Health Access California (Acceso a la Salud de California, afirma, con base en el reporte, que esta reducción al presupuesto tendría incluso consecuencias económicas en cascada.

"Estos recortes nos obligan a perder cientos de millones de dólares en fondos compensatorios federales, y eso tiene un Efecto Dominó en la economía: impacta en empleos, salarios y hasta en el costo de servicios de salud."

La organización Health Access ofrece más información en su página, www.health-access.org.


get more stories like this via email

After more than 50 years of use, some Michigan lawmakers say naloxone may not be the best choice in an overdose situation.

Naloxone is sometimes called the "Lazarus drug" because of its powerful ability to seemingly resurrect people after a drug overdose.

Sen. Kevin Hertel, D-St. Clair Shores, and some of his colleagues have introduced a bill which would open the door for what they say are more costly, but more powerful, antidotes.

"Given the prevalence of fentanyl in our communities, and how much stronger some of these drugs that we're now seeing are, we believe -- and in talking with others -- that there should be other tools to respond to an overdose," Hertel explained. "To make sure we're doing everything we can to save somebody's life."

Not everyone is on board with the proposed legislation, Senate Bill 542. Opponents argued the more expensive naloxone alternatives are not necessary, and using them would only increase profits for the pharmaceutical industry.

Jonathan Stoltman, director of the Opioid Policy Institute in Grand Rapids, said while the naloxone alternatives do help in overdose situations, they can also cause nasty side effects.

"The newer approaches, they put people into more severe withdrawal," Stoltman pointed out. "That's a pretty profound negative side effect. The one approach is very inexpensive and works great; the other approach is far more expensive and has this strong negative side effect."

Sponsors of the bill say they're hoping to give Michigan residents a chance to chime in on the issue in a public hearing sometime in June. Michigan saw more than 3,000 opioid overdose deaths in 2021.


get more stories like this via email

New Mexico saw record enrollment numbers for the Affordable Care Act this year and is now setting its sights on lowering out-of-pocket costs - those not reimbursed by insurance. More than 56,000 New Mexicans are enrolled in a medical health insurance plan on the state exchange - an increase of 12,000 people overall.

Colin Baillio, deputy superintendent with the state's Office of Insurance, said the state has boosted its outreach and made efforts to improve the overall consumer experience.

"We saw a 40% year-over-year increase, and New Mexico saw the biggest percentage increase during the open-enrollment period among all of the state-based marketplaces," he explained

Part of the enrollment increase is due to what's called the "unwinding" - a federal directive that required all states to redetermine Medicaid eligibility following a three-year pause on checks during the COVID pandemic. He said by using expanded tools made available by the federal and state government, 8% of New Mexico's population is now uninsured - down from 23% in 2010.

Following approval by lawmakers in the 2024 legislative session, the New Mexico governor signed seven health care-related bills into law - one of which requires annual reporting of prescription drug pricing. Baililo said the Affordable Care Act built the foundation that has allowed the state to pursue additional affordability initiatives.

"I'm really glad to see that there's so much interest in the next step of health reform, really leaning into these out-of-pocket cost issues and making it easier for people to afford to stay covered and see their doctors," he continued.

Two years ago, the state also passed a one-of-a-kind law that did away with behavioral health co-pays for people in certain insurance plans.

New York's medical aid-in-dying bill is gaining further support. The Medical Society of the State of New York is supporting the bill. New York's bill allows terminally ill people with only six months to live to use this option, with safeguards requiring two physicians' approval.

The bill's Assembly sponsor Amy Paulin, D-Westchester, said despite the growing support, other hurdles lie ahead.

"Now we have what I believe, if it came to the floor, a majority. There's still a hesitation on the part of leadership. You know, we need members to assure leadership that they no longer have reservations," she said.

Other newly resolved concerns center on making sure insurance companies and doctors who don't support this aren't held liable. She's optimistic the bill will pass after nine years in the Legislature. New York would be the 11th state along with Washington, D.C. to have medical aid in dying legislation.

Corinne Carey, senior New York campaign director with Compassion and Choices finds the pandemic drew a vivid picture of a person's end-of-life experience. There were images of people dying on ventilators, apart from loved ones, and unable to communicate. She said people began thinking about a "good death."

"And, what is a good death is being surrounded by loved ones, having some measure of control, experiencing the touch of your loved ones, and being the one in the driver's seat," she explained.

Now people have different options for end-of-life care, each of which presents various challenges. Polls show medical aid in dying has garnered considerable support since being introduced in 2015. A 2022 Compassion and Choices poll finds 57% of nurses support medical aid in dying professionally, although fewer support it personally.