PNS National Newscast

Audio Activation
"Siri, play the Public News Service (podcast)"
"Hey Google, play the Public News Service podcast"
"Alexa, play Public News Service podcast"
or "Alexa, what's my news flash?" once you set it up in the Alexa app

2020Talks

Audio Activation
"Siri, play the 2020Talks podcast"
"Hey Google, play the 2020Talks podcast"
"Alexa, play Two-Thousand-Twenty Talks podcast"
or "Alexa, what's my news flash?" once you set it up in the Alexa app

Newscasts

PNS Daily Newscast - October 21, 2020 


A new report sizes up swing states like Michigan; voters with disabilities face new obstacles in Election 2020.


2020Talks - October 21, 2020 


Democrats weigh boycotting the committee vote on Trump's Supreme Court nominee; and concerns over mail slowdowns in 10 battleground states.

Advocates Praise Denial of Desalination Plant

The plant was proposed for Haverstraw, N.Y., 3.5 miles from the Indian Point Nuclear Power Station.  (Alexisrael/Wikimedia Commons)
The plant was proposed for Haverstraw, N.Y., 3.5 miles from the Indian Point Nuclear Power Station. (Alexisrael/Wikimedia Commons)
December 21, 2015

NEW YORK - Last week's decision by the Public Service Commission to turn down a proposed water desalination plant in Rockland County is being called an important victory for the public good, but some feel it came only after a fight that could have been avoided had the water system not been run by a private enterprise.

Eric Weltman, senior organizer with Food and Water Watch, says the plan was denied over environmental concerns and the expense. He says it would have generated a lot of money for the private company that controls Rockland County's water system, Suez, formerly known as United Water of New York.

While Weltman is happy with the outcome, he says it's an example of what can happen when a public utility falls into private hands.

"Corporations, when they take over what really should be a public obligation, can run a muck and end up doing something that's costly to the ratepayers and really bad for the environment as well," he says.

Weltman says millions had been spent by Suez on promotion and planning for the plant, and it would cost another $150 million to build. As for the environment ...

"These plants consume massive amounts of energy," says Weltman. "So, from the perspective of needing to prevent a climate catastrophe, this plant would have been absolutely the wrong direction to go."

Suez officials had called the plant a necessity, but ultimately spoke in favor of the PSC decision, expressing a willingness to work with the community on an alternative long range water plan. Weltman says an alternative plan using conservation, efficiency and maintenance can meet the county's needs while imposing less of a burden on ratepayer pocketbooks.

Andrea Sears, Public News Service - NY