HARTFORD, Conn. - A bill to help protect victims of domestic violence passed in Connecticut's House of Representatives on Wednesday.

By a 104-42 vote, the House sent House Bill 5054 on to the Senate for consideration. That bill would require those subject to temporary restraining orders to turn over their firearms to police or a federally licensed dealer.

According to Karen Jarmoc, president and chief executive of the Connecticut Coalition Against Domestic Violence, access to firearms in a domestic-violence situation increases the likelihood of homicide by 500 percent.

"When a victim leaves a relationship, and quite often when they apply for a restraining order that is the first time they are signaling that they are leaving, it's a highly dangerous and lethal time," she said.

Opponents of the bill have said it would violate the due-process and Second Amendment rights of gun owners. But Jarmok countered that the bill isn't about confiscating firearms; it's about protecting life.

"We're talking about an applicant who has sworn that the information on their application for the ex-parte order is true," she said. "There's a process where it's reviewed by a judge, and not all ex parte orders are issued."

HB 5054 also would require a hearing on a permanent restraining order within seven days and, if an order is lifted, the return of firearms within five days.

At least 20 other states have passed similar laws. Jarmok said Connecticut's bill almost passed last year but was put off by the threat of a filibuster at the end of the legislative session. She said she believes this year will be different.

"Lawmakers who support it are very secure in staving off any attempts by opponents to pull out amendments and filibusters that will derail it," she said, "because they feel so important about this measure."

The bill could come up for a vote in the Senate as early as this weekend.

The text of the bill is online at cga.ct.gov.


get more stories like this via email

Violence prevention groups said building trust in vulnerable neighborhoods is key to their success but a global humanitarian organization worries about setbacks after the federal government cut off grant money for its work in Minneapolis.

Nonviolent Peaceforce said a big portion of its funding was swept up in a host of grant cuts carried out by the Justice Department, including the group's "Interrupt Cycles of Violence" project in North Minneapolis. Funding for the initiative was supposed to keep flowing into the fall but is now off the table.

Odell Wilson, community peacebuilder for Nonviolent Peaceforce, said it means the teens he has been mentoring will receive disappointing news.

"Not being able to keep that promise or keep those goals set for them -- in my perspective -- that's really unacceptable and it's not fair," Wilson contended.

He emphasized if Nonviolent Peaceforce can no longer provide community spaces, healing circles and other activities, it is another broken promise from adults in their lives. As it scrambles, the organization said it will try to keep connections in the city. The Justice Department did not respond to a request for comment but broadly said certain types of grants no longer align with the Trump administration's priorities.

Minneapolis officials recently touted positive numbers in reducing violent crime in areas where Nonviolent Peaceforce is present. But Wilson argued abruptly scaling back their work could reinforce conditions for future violence.

"If none of us are trying to do that extra work and understand what it is that's really going on in the relationship field, in the trust field, I don't really see too much change happening in cases of wanting to improve the community or improve that cycle of violence," Wilson stressed.

The organization said the cut represents 40% of its federal support for violence prevention and community-based safety work in the U.S. A similar grant for San Diego was terminated early. Officials said the aid has been backed by Congress over the past decade and with the new administration, they worry about a tone in Washington D.C. where future funding requests are not even given a chance.

Florida State University students joined survivors of past mass shootings at the state Capitol this week, demanding that Gov. Ron DeSantis veto a bill that would lower the gun purchasing age to 18.

The protest follows last week's shooting at FSU's Student Union, the state's sixth mass shooting this year according to the Gun Violence Archive.

Caim Strickland was working on an engineering lab project when the alerts flashed across his phone. He spoke moments after the campuswide lockdown was lifted.

"Campus has always been a safe place, so to see this happen is crazy," he said. "You always hear about it happening somewhere else, other schools, but you never really think it's going to happen here."

The shooting, which killed two and injured six, marked F-S-U's first on-campus gun violence incident since 2014. It occurred weeks after the Florida House passed a bill to lower the gun purchase age from 21 to 18. However, Senate leaders confirmed they had already decided before the shooting not to take up the bill this session, effectively stalling it.

Rep. Christine Hunschofsky, D-Parkland, helped craft mental-health reforms after the 2018 massacre at Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School, and said her focus now is on trauma response.

"I think what's important right now is that everybody gets the help and support they need. I have seen what happens in the aftermath of these traumatic situations, and unaddressed trauma is very detrimental to people," she explained.

The 2018 Parkland massacre left 17 dead and 17 wounded on Valentine's Day. It ranks among America's deadliest school shootings.

The tragedy prompted then-Gov. Rick Scott to sign a package of reforms, including raising Florida's minimum age for rifle purchases to 21, matching the federal standard already in place for handguns. The National Rifle Association quickly launched a constitutional challenge after the changes.


get more stories like this via email

Several pieces of Democrat-backed gun legislation have been heard by Nevada's Senate and Assembly Judiciary Committees but not without opposition from firearms proponents.

Assembly Bill 105 would ban firearms within 100 feet of election sites. Assembly Bill 245 would prohibit anyone younger than 21 from purchasing or possessing a semiautomatic shotgun or assault rifle. And Senate Bill 89 would tighten firearm restrictions for those convicted of hate crimes.

Sen. Julie Pazina, D-Las Vegas, said as the temperature of national discourse increases, it is imperative the measures be passed.

"The consequences of this divisiveness are real and they can't be ignored any longer," Pazina emphasized. "As a Jewish Nevadan, I have witnessed my communities and others like it come under attack simply because of the way we worship."

Pazina noted members of Nevada's LGBTQ+ community as well as ethnic and racial groups have also been targets of attacks. Each year more than 10,000 violent hate crime attacks involve either the use or threatened use of guns in the U.S., according to Giffords, the gun violence prevention organization.

Backers of Assembly Bill 245 said by restricting anyone younger than 21 from being able to purchase or possess a semiautomatic shotgun or assault rifle, suicide rates would decrease. Advocates said it strikes the right balance between the Second Amendment and preventing access to the most dangerous firearms.

Sen. Ira Hansen, R-Sparks, said otherwise.

"You take away this particular category and the people that want to kill themselves will no longer do so?" Hansen asked. "Crazy. Just crazy."

Data shows most of the deadliest mass shootings in the country since 2018 were committed by people younger than 21.

Tanya Schardt, senior counsel and director of state and federal policy for the Brady Campaign to Prevent Gun Violence, said most mass shooters younger than 21 bought their firearms legally. She argued there have to be more barriers to prevent tragedies from happening.

"By not doing that, we are creating an environment where all of our children are having to have shooter drills," Schardt stressed. "We're creating an environment where children are scared to go to school, where teachers are scared to be there."


get more stories like this via email