NEW YORK - Undocumented immigrants who arrived as children contribute millions in tax dollars to New York, according to a new report.
The Trump administration is sending mixed messages about whether those granted Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals status by the Obama administration will be deported or allowed to stay and work legally. David Dyssegaard Kallick, director of the Fiscal Policy Institute, said he believes one consideration should be the contributions young immigrants are making, in New York and nationally.
"DACA recipients contribute $140 million to New York state and local tax revenues," he said. "So, we wanted to show the very substantial contribution of young people who are, in all kinds of ways, making real contributions to the economy and to our state's society."
According to the report, prepared by the Institute on Taxation and Economic Policy, about 1.3 million immigrants eligible for DACA nationwide pay about $2 billion a year in combined state and local taxes. Kallick noted that making it clear DACA recipients can make this country their home permanently would likely increase their contributions even more.
"If they had a path to citizenship," he said, "they could not only be doing the jobs they may be doing now but also feel confident that they could stay here, have a real career."
The ITEP report estimated that a path to citizenship would increase the tax contributions of DACA recipients in New York by another $40 million a year.
As a presidential candidate, Trump said DACA recipients would be deported. However, last Friday he reversed himself, saying they will not be targets for deportation. Kallick said he believes the change of heart may be due to growing community resistance.
"These are people who are working, they're people who are going to school, they're serving in the military," he said. "Why would we want to be deporting these kids, who grew up side-by-side with my kids in school? It just doesn't make sense."
The ITEP report is online at itep.org.
get more stories like this via email
The Trump administration has made it clear it will cut funding from schools continuing diversity, equity and inclusion programs and with record levels of Immigration and Customs Enforcement funding for detention and deportation in the new federal budget, more school districts are quietly rethinking their policies.
Barbara Marler, an independent education consultant and adviser with over 40 years of experience, is working with school districts to help them rephrase DEI-related language so it will not be flagged in automated searches. She explained her goal is to help shield their work and emphasizes the unprecedented nature of her efforts.
"ESL and bilingual, as a field, has always had some level of controversy," Marler acknowledged. "But this is at a whole 'nother level that I've never seen before."
The Trump administration has called DEI policies "dangerous and demeaning." Marler noted school district leaders tell her the current pressures they face feel insurmountable. So far, she has worked with two districts in Illinois on strategies and expects more will follow since the passage of the new federal budget bill last week.
Alejandra Vázquez Baur, a fellow at the Century Foundation and cofounder and director of the National Newcomer Network, said immigrant justice organizations operating in 'red' states have long been aware of the risks and have adapted their language to continue their work discreetly. She added now, even groups in blue states like Illinois, which once operated more openly, are facing increased pressure to avoid being targeted.
"It's scary, because many people who enter into this work do this because they themselves are immigrants, and/or they have undocumented family members or employees that they fear are at risk should the administration come after them, or should they lose funding and not be able to pay their employees," Vázquez Baur outlined.
The Supreme Court ruling in the 1982 case Plyler v. Doe determined all children in the U.S. have the right to a public education, regardless of immigration status. But Vázquez Baur stressed she is concerned about the chilling effect the current administration is having on such basic rights and freedoms. She warned jeopardizing the rights of immigrant students can lead to the erosion of rights for all.
"Many organizations have to back down as they consider all of their circumstances," Vázquez Baur added. "But for those places that have the ability to do so, those organizations and districts should dig deeper, because we cannot be silent in the face of these attacks."
get more stories like this via email
A Tennessee immigrant-led group and other advocates are suing the state over a new law they said unfairly targets people who offer shelter to undocumented immigrants.
Of the over 400,000 immigrants living in Tennessee, around 128,000 are undocumented.
Lisa Sherman Luna, executive director of the Tennessee Immigrant and Refugee Rights Coalition and its political action committee TIRRC Votes, said her organization is seeking a preliminary injunction to block the "anti-harboring" law from taking effect July 1. She described the law, which would create a felony offense for human smuggling, as having no clear guidance on who it targets or how it will be enforced.
"We believe this law is unconstitutional and an overreach of the state government," Luna emphasized. "For us, SB 392 is ripping apart the very fabric of who we aspire to be as Tennesseans."
Luna noted the lawsuit is backed by the Institute for Constitutional Advocacy and Protection and the American Immigration Council. She added the law could criminalize basic acts of care like churches offering shelter or families living together.
Luna pointed out her organization recently met with Kilmar Abrego Garcia's wife and brother, along with national immigrant rights group CASA, to spotlight his case. She said he was denied fair legal protections, describing the impact it's had on his family.
"We see Kilmar's case as an example of the erosion of due process that is happening to individuals here in Tennessee," Luna outlined. "We had devastating ICE raids earlier in May that resulted in almost 200 people being kidnapped right from their cars in a coordinated operation between the Tennessee Highway Patrol and ICE."
Garcia remains in jail as lawyers debate whether the Justice Department can intervene to block his deportation, should he be released ahead of trial on human smuggling charges. Luna is calling on Tennesseans to stand with immigrant communities by volunteering, donating, or joining advocacy efforts. She added immigrants are at the forefront of building a stronger, multiracial democracy.
get more stories like this via email
Advocates for immigrants' rights in Washington state are voicing concerns about the possible expansion of the H-2A visa program, which they say exploits migrant workers.
Washington is one of five states most dependent on H-2A workers in the country -- whose numbers have ballooned in the last decade to about 33,000.
Edgar Franks, political director for the independent farmworker union Familias Unidas por la Justicia, based in Skagit County, said farm labor shortages caused by mass deportations could increase reliance on the program, and H-2A workers often face wage theft and poor housing.
"Being crammed into a small room, or if you're in a place where it's really hot, there's no ventilation or air conditioning," said Franks. "The bathrooms are lacking in sanitation. Sometimes they give mattresses with bed bugs in them."
From 2018 to 2023, the Department of Labor found nearly 70,000 violations against employers of H-2A workers - the most common was wage theft.
Rep. Dan Newhouse, R-Wash., wants to expand the program through the Farm Workforce Modernization Act, which he says would ease burdens on farmers.
Franks said one of the problems with the program is that workers' visas are connected to a specific employer, giving that employer too much control.
If a worker is laid off or fired, their visa becomes invalid and they must leave the country immediately.
"It's really hard for workers to really speak up," said Franks, "and talk about their wages, or make formal complaints, because of fear of retaliation."
U.S. companies should raise their wages in Mexico, added Franks, which would reduce the need for people to go North.
He also called for workers who have already been working in the state, sometimes for decades, to be legalized.
"If you have workers that are protected and paid well and treated well," said Franks, "that's in the interest of the whole nation. We should recognize that and really step up for farmworkers."
get more stories like this via email