MADISON, Wis. – The U.S. Supreme Court on Monday decided to review a case ruled on last November that said the 2011 Republican re-drawing of State Assembly boundaries was an unconstitutional gerrymander, because of excessive partisanship.

Republicans maintain their methods were within the bounds of the Constitution.

There have been cases heard in the past regarding the method in which political boundaries are drawn, but Jay Heck, executive director of Common Cause in Wisconsin says this time it's different.

"In the past it's been thrown out because it's been in violation of voting rights or civil rights laws, but gerrymandering has always been considered somewhat of a partisan exercise,” he explains. “But in this case the U.S. Supreme Court may decide that this was too excessive."

Wisconsin Democrats argue that the 2011 Republican maps were drawn with the express purpose of disenfranchising Democratic voters.

Republicans disagree, and Republican legislative leaders have already hired two high profile law firms to represent them before the Supreme Court.

In May, the Supreme Court struck down two North Carolina congressional districts that the court said were drawn based too heavily on race.

Twelve Republican-dominated states have already lined up to support Wisconsin's Republicans in defending the 2011 maps. But Heck says both parties gerrymander to gain advantage, and the Wisconsin decision will have national implications.

"Democrats did the same thing in states like Rhode Island and Maryland, so this is not a Republican-Democratic issue,” he points out. “Of course, our neighbors to the south, Illinois, the Democrats have been doing this for years to the Republicans, so this could actually change the standard nationwide."

After the 2011 redistricting in Wisconsin, Republican candidates won 60 of the 99 seats in the State Assembly. However, Democratic candidates won a majority of the votes cast statewide for Assembly.

Heck says the U.S. Supreme Court could rule that this kind of partisan map drawing is constitutional.

"We tend to think that they're probably not going to do that, that they're probably going to opt for saying that excessive partisanship in drawing state legislative boundaries is unconstitutional, thereby upholding the Federal court decision last November," he states.

The Supreme Court will take up the Wisconsin case this fall.





get more stories like this via email

An Arkansas mayor joined city leaders from across the country for the National League of Cities Congressional City Conference in the nation's capital this week, and discussed some of the most pressing issues facing communities, from transportation to public safety.

Jonas Anderson, mayor of Cave City and president of the Arkansas Municipal League, focused on education, cybersecurity, and workforce training, but said infrastructure took the spotlight. He pointed out federal funding from the American Rescue Plan Act is being put to use at home in Cave City.

"And we were able to utilize those funds to make some major improvements in our water and sewer system," Anderson explained. "We've actually been doing that the last couple of years, we just wrapped up one project on that we're looking forward to doing another one this summer"

The American Rescue Plan Act allocated nearly $2.6 billion to Arkansas for COVID-19 response needs, fill revenue shortfalls, and address the unequal impact of the pandemic on certain populations. The money must be used by Dec. 31, 2024.

As a rural community with fewer than 2,000 residents, Anderson acknowledged Cave City faces funding challenges based on its small population and added he is working with area partners to seek additional money for a revitalization project.

"We've purchased a few historic properties in our old downtown section," Anderson outlined. "We're actually going to renovate those and convert those into City Hall offices, police department building for them to utilize, and then we're going to use one as a kind of a public space pocket park area."

Anderson added Cave City and its partners are also seeking local and federal funds for other projects, and applying for recreation and tourism grants.


get more stories like this via email

Idaho students are not letting their right to vote with a school ID go down without a fight.

Earlier this month, state lawmakers passed legislation to prohibit the use of student IDs as a valid form of identification when voting.

Matt Gordon, an attorney representing the groups Babe Vote and March for Our Lives Idaho, which filed suit to challenge the law, said it is a direct attack on Idaho students' ability to vote.

"When you remove a form of identification that students have and that they can show at the polls for voting, that does make it harder for some students to vote, particularly students for whom that is the only form of acceptable identification that they might have to show at the polls," Gordon contended.

Gordon noted the legislation comes at a time when youth voter registration has surged. An analysis of 2022 compared with 2018 found registration for people ages 18 and 19 in the state jumped 81%, the highest in the nation. Lawmakers who supported the bill said it is needed to counter voter fraud.

However, Gordon noted lawmakers, as well as the Secretary of State, could not cite any cases to support this claim.

"The evidence just isn't there," Gordon argued. "They presented no evidence of any fraud associated with the use of student IDs to vote."

Gordon added the aim is to have this case resolved before the 2024 election, so students understand what kind of identification they need, or need to obtain, to vote next year.

Support for this reporting was provided by The Carnegie Corporation of New York.


get more stories like this via email

There's no rest for Georgia's voting rights groups in this non-election year, though another slew of voting restrictions proposed by a group of Republican legislators is on hold for now.

Advocates are on alert for the possible return of Senate Bill 221 - which would make registering to vote in Georgia even more challenging, ban all ballot drop boxes, and require mandatory audits after every election.

Albany Voter's Coalition Chair Delinda Bryant said recent events have amplified the need for their efforts.

"There is never an off-year," said Bryant. "People are turning 18 every year. I think it needs to start early getting people accustomed, getting used to getting out and exercising their rights. Voting controls your entire life."

Last fall's voting rates already took a hit, after SB 202 went into effect, which Bryant says made voting much less convenient.

SB 202 took away some ballot boxes and allowed individuals to object to voters for any reason. Data from Georgia's Secretary of State shows absentee and mail-in ballot usage in January's run-off was down 36% compared to the general election.

Supporters for additional voting restrictions argue they're needed for additional accuracy, despite the extra roadblocks to access.

Bryant said such challenges disproportionately affect minorities and people with disabilities.

As a result, the coalition intends to intensify its efforts to educate voters and work closely with community influencers to ensure that people are well-informed and ready for the upcoming elections.

"It's more than just getting them registered," said Bryant. "It's getting them educated too and that's what we are targeting this year."

Since the legislative session lasts for two years, SB 221 - and any bill that failed to pass - may be reintroduced next year.

Bryant emphasized that comprehending the legislative process and the long-term potential impact of bills is vital.

She also suggested that voting in local elections also plays a critical role in promoting education and fostering year-round voting initiatives.

Support for this reporting was provided by the Carnegie Corporation of New York.



get more stories like this via email