U.S. Supreme Court to Hear Wisconsin Gerrymandering Case
Tuesday, June 20, 2017
MADISON, Wis. – The U.S. Supreme Court on Monday decided to review a case ruled on last November that said the 2011 Republican re-drawing of State Assembly boundaries was an unconstitutional gerrymander, because of excessive partisanship.
Republicans maintain their methods were within the bounds of the Constitution.
There have been cases heard in the past regarding the method in which political boundaries are drawn, but Jay Heck, executive director of Common Cause in Wisconsin says this time it's different.
"In the past it's been thrown out because it's been in violation of voting rights or civil rights laws, but gerrymandering has always been considered somewhat of a partisan exercise,” he explains. “But in this case the U.S. Supreme Court may decide that this was too excessive."
Wisconsin Democrats argue that the 2011 Republican maps were drawn with the express purpose of disenfranchising Democratic voters.
Republicans disagree, and Republican legislative leaders have already hired two high profile law firms to represent them before the Supreme Court.
In May, the Supreme Court struck down two North Carolina congressional districts that the court said were drawn based too heavily on race.
Twelve Republican-dominated states have already lined up to support Wisconsin's Republicans in defending the 2011 maps. But Heck says both parties gerrymander to gain advantage, and the Wisconsin decision will have national implications.
"Democrats did the same thing in states like Rhode Island and Maryland, so this is not a Republican-Democratic issue,” he points out. “Of course, our neighbors to the south, Illinois, the Democrats have been doing this for years to the Republicans, so this could actually change the standard nationwide."
After the 2011 redistricting in Wisconsin, Republican candidates won 60 of the 99 seats in the State Assembly. However, Democratic candidates won a majority of the votes cast statewide for Assembly.
Heck says the U.S. Supreme Court could rule that this kind of partisan map drawing is constitutional.
"We tend to think that they're probably not going to do that, that they're probably going to opt for saying that excessive partisanship in drawing state legislative boundaries is unconstitutional, thereby upholding the Federal court decision last November," he states.
The Supreme Court will take up the Wisconsin case this fall.
get more stories like this via email

Social Issues
New findings confirm suspicions about the top reasons many students considered dropping out of college over the last six months. The Gallup and …
Social Issues
Two reports confirm a troubling trend in terms of Black students attending college. According to the University System of Georgia, enrollment among …
Health and Wellness
States such as Minnesota continue to grapple with recent spikes in fatal overdoses tied to opioids. Now, a federal agency has taken what aid groups …
Social Issues
Everyone starts college with pretty much the same dream - to earn a degree and have a better life. But sometimes life gets in the way, and dreams get …
Social Issues
Food assistance is integral for families - but it's also important that the food available makes sense culturally. The American Heart Association …
Environment
A celebration will be held in El Paso Friday after five decades of activism paid off, when President Joe Biden designated Texas' Castner Range a …
Social Issues
The Iowa Senate has advanced a bill to outlaw handling a cellphone while driving. The state already has a distracted driving law, but it allows …
Social Issues
With an average hourly wage of under $15 in 2021, many Nebraska agricultural workers would be hard-pressed to afford an attorney if they needed one …