ST. PAUL, Minn. – The future of unions could hang on a case being argued Monday before the U.S. Supreme Court.

It's called Janus v. American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees (AFSCME), and an Illinois man who says it’s unconstitutional to charge him for belonging to a union workplace brought it.

AFSCME, the union that represents 1.6 million people, will argue that all workers benefit from a collectively bargained contract.

"Our union delivers a lot of services for people,” says Kathleen Farber, an AFSCME retiree who came to a rally in St. Paul over the weekend. “We do the contract negotiations, grievance processing, and those things cost money.

“If people don't have to pay anything, we're going to end up underfunding our unions, and eventually they'll be crippled by it."

Hundreds of union supporters including faith leaders, elected officials and immigrant rights groups attended the rally at the State Capitol.

It was part of a national event called the Working People's Day of Action, timed to coincide with the Janus arguments.

Destiny Dusosky came from St. Cloud with her mother, also an AFSCME member and her daughter, who plans to attend college next year with some financial help from the union.

"Because of my union, I'm able to afford good health care for my children,” she points out. “I'm able to one day hopefully retire with dignity.

“Those are really important benefits to me, and if we didn't collectively bargain for those, I wouldn't have them right now."

In 2016, the Supreme Court heard a similar case from California, but voted 4-4 and never decided the case because of the death of Justice Antonin Scalia. This time, all eyes will be on the new justice, Neil Gorsuch.

Because President Donald Trump appointed Gorsuch, union members are worried that the court will rule against them.

Dave Snyder, an ironworker on construction jobs statewide, came to St. Paul to defend what he says is the middle class life unions have helped to provide.

"We are destroying the very fabric of America,” he insists. “So we have to stand strong and we have to support our local unions."

The court is expected to decide the case by the end of June.


get more stories like this via email

Postal service staffing shortages across the United States, including in rural areas of Mississippi, are being cited as one of the reasons for mail delivery delays. Members of the American Postal Workers Union are calling for more staffing and better pay to reduce turnover.

George Collins, who's a member of the American Postal Workers Union in Biloxi, said he was notified in a letter that the postal service has a new process to reroute daily mail and packages from Gulfport to Jackson, which he said is also impacting on-time delivery.

"And then it's gonna all be put in a truck to drive three-plus hours to the Jackson processing plant. By the time it gets to Jackson, Jackson will have already dispatched the truck with the delivery mail for the next day in Gulfport back to the Gulfport plant. So it will be delayed at least a day," Collins said.

Collins added the public is invited to attend a March 6th meeting from 3 to 5 p.m. at Mississippi Gulf Coast Community College about the modernization and restructuring of the Gulfport mail processing center. He said Gulfport processes mail for the entire Mississippi coast.

Collins emphasizes the importance of Mississippians to work with Congress and lawmakers to require the Postal Service to return the service standards to the 2012 specification, which requires the local delivery of mail to be within one to two days.

"No member of Congress, neither House of Representatives or the Senate, has progressed these bills to put them on the floor. However, every member of the United States of America is duly affected by this. But Congress and the Senate failed to act," he said.

Collins added the Postal Service delivers medicine to disabled veterans on behalf of the Department of Veterans Affairs. But recently, the Postal Service implemented a ten year transformation plan Delivering For America, which he said has resulted in slower mail delivery. He added this is negatively impacting disabled veterans who rely on getting their VA-prescribed medicine by mail in a timely manner.


get more stories like this via email

A group of health-care workers in Montana will learn tomorrow whether their new union contract has been ratified.

The tentative deal, between SEIU 775 and Consumer Direct Montana - a health care provider - would mean higher wages, more time off and better professional opportunities.

The Service Employee International Union Local 775 represents about 1,600 health-care workers in Montana. Most are in-home caregivers, a role that is notoriously underpaid.

The union's Montana state Director, Jacquie Helt, said the new labor contract with Consumer Direct Montana would mean big changes for workers - not the least of which is higher pay.

"Guaranteed wage increases of at least $5 per hour," said Helt. "In what is traditionally considered a lower-wage sector, that is really significant."

Helt said the raise would boost Consumer Direct's average starting wage to just under $20 an hour for the unionized employees.

The contract also calls for an additional $1.25 increase in the fall. SEIU 775 is counting the ratification votes and expects results tomorrow.

In addition to better pay, the new contract would also mean more professional opportunities, which Helt said are important to workers in this field - things like training and union representation during conflicts with their employer.

Jill Selman, an SEIU 775 member and in-home caregiver for Consumer Direct, has been in the field for 27 years.

"This job is where my passion is," said Selman. "It's where my heart is. It's what I'd really like to be doing, but it's never been something I could do as my steady career to support my life. I have always had a second job while being a caregiver, and this will allow me to be able to only have just the one job."

Selman added that getting paid time off would also be a big advantage if the contract is ratified.

Currently, Medicaid doesn't reimburse Selman or other caregivers when their patients are hospitalized. Paid time off would mean they don't miss out on a paycheck.

Federal employees rallied in Washington D.C. this week calling on Congress to raise their wages and avoid a government shutdown.

With more than 120,000 federal employees based in Maryland, the March expiration of the latest continuing resolution looms large in the state.

On Tuesday, the American Federation of Government Employees held a rally on Capitol Hill in support of fully funding the government.

The federation is the largest federal employee union, and national President Everett Kelley said it's time for Congress to step up.

"Not only do we want them to do their job, but we want them to fund the government, right?" said Kelley. "Keep the government open. Keep the government serving the American people. This is the most basic function of Congress."

In a continuing resolution passed last November, the House split government funding into two tranches with separate deadlines. The current continuing resolution expiration dates are March 1 and March 8.

Rally attendees also spoke out in support of the "Federal Adjustment of Income Rates" or "FAIR Act", which would raise federal employee wages by 7.4% in 2025.

U.S. Rep. Glenn Ivey - D-Cheverly - represents Prince George's County in the House and said federal workers deserve a raise.

"The FAIR Act's going to pass, right?" said Ivey. "Seven point four percent, you're long overdue. And we're going to make sure that you all get the pay raise that you deserve."

The Federal Salary Council advisory board calculates that federal employees make on average 27% less than people doing similar jobs in the private sector.