PNS Daily News - July 15, 2020 

The Trump Administration reverses course on international student rule; the ultra-rich keep getting richer; and rental costs are burdens for low-wage workers.

2020Talks - July 15, 2020 

Biden follows up on a climate policy plan from his task force, made up of his and Sen. Bernie Sanders' supporters. Alabama, Maine and Texas had elections; new data from California's March presidential primary show 1.5% of returned absentee ballots rejected.

Groups Call Ruling a Win for Michigan's Water, Democracy

Michigan Citizens for Water Conservation contends the state failed act to protect water resources from corporate interests. (MCWC)
Michigan Citizens for Water Conservation contends the state failed act to protect water resources from corporate interests. (MCWC)
December 10, 2019

LANSING, Mich. — Despite a legal victory against a major corporation, environmental and community groups are not letting their guards down when it comes to protecting Michigan's water. The Michigan Court of Appeals last week ruled Osceola Township had the right to deny a zoning permit to Nestle for a booster station to increase water extraction.

The company had argued local zoning officials were improperly influenced by public opposition. But Peggy Case, president of Michigan Citizens for Water Conservation, said the court ruled that elected officials should be sensitive to residents' concerns, and would be wrong to not take public opinion into account.

"It's a beautiful ruling on democracy, on the rights of citizens to actually elect the people that they want and expect them to perform on their behalf,” Case said.

The court also stated it was "erroneous" of the circuit court to rule Nestle's water-bottling operation is an essential public service. The company wants to increase pumping rates at its Evart well from 150-200 gallons per minute to more than 400 gallons per minute. The permit to increase production still is awaiting a ruling in a Contested Case filed by Michigan Citizens for Water Conservation.

Nestle can appeal the case to the Michigan Supreme Court, or try to get the property rezoned. Case observed the company wants the water, and she's anticipating their next move.

"They were going to try to run trucks on these rural roads. There's some possibility they might try to run another pipe,” she said. “So they have other options and, of course, we would attempt to counteract anything they might do to be even more destructive to the environment than they already are."

Since 2000, Nestle has extracted more than 4 billion gallons of water from Michigan. Case said her group has been struggling ever since to get the attention of local and state leaders.

"We just filed a complaint for the failure of the state to help us deal with Nestle's grabbing of public water and forcing a small environmental group to spend buckets of money doing the kind of work that the state should be doing,” she said.

Meanwhile, a "Water Protection Package" was introduced in the Michigan House last week. It aims to clarify that the waters of the state are held in the public trust, and prevent Michigan's waters from being privatized by corporations.

Disclosure: Michigan Citizens for Water Conservation contributes to our fund for reporting. If you would like to help support news in the public interest, click here.
Mary Schuermann Kuhlman, Public News Service - MI