HARTFORD, Conn. -- A majority of Connecticut voters say people who have been convicted of a crime should have a fair chance to get their lives back on track, according to a recent poll.
The poll, conducted for the American Civil Liberty Union's Campaign for Smart Justice, found that 70% of Democrats and 56% of Republicans in the state support laws that allow people to have their criminal records automatically erased after five years without new offenses.
Claudine Fox, campaign manager for ACLU of Connecticut, calls the poll results "very encouraging."
"It shows people believe that once folks have served their time in prison, they deserve an opportunity to restart their lives, to support their families, to have stable jobs and housing and all of that," she states.
Clean slate legislation was introduced in the state legislature last year but failed to pass. Fox says that bill appears to be a priority for Gov. Ned Lamont's office this year.
Fox notes that despite passage of the so-called ban-the-box bill, removing questions about past convictions from job applications, people who have a criminal record still experience more than 500 barriers to housing, jobs and licensing.
"Background checks are still a thing, Google is still a thing, and a quick Google search or a quick background check can often stop people from being able to participate in those jobs where all they want to do is give back to their community," she points out.
Fox says clean slate legislation needs to include ways to hold people accountable if they discriminate against someone based on his or her criminal history.
The poll found that 84% of Connecticut voters agree that the main purpose of prison should be to rehabilitate people to successfully re-enter society.
Fox points out that denying the formerly incarcerated something as basic as housing can make that impossible.
"If you don't have a consistent place to lay your head at night, how are you even expected to maintain a job, fill out your taxes, all those things that society has deemed necessary to be a participant," she states.
Full results of the polling can be found online at ACLUCT.org.
get more stories like this via email
South Dakota is creating an Office of Indigent Legal Services after House Bill 1057 passed the Legislature with nearly unanimous support this month.
The U.S. Constitution gives all people accused of a crime the right to a lawyer. South Dakota is one of only two states where counties, not the state, have been responsible for providing public defenders for those who cannot afford to pay.
Neil Fulton, dean of the Knudson School of Law at the University of South Dakota and co-chair of the Indigent Legal Services Task Force, said costs added up for counties, and noted there are added challenges for people in rural counties seeking attorneys.
"The biggest challenge is just availability," Fulton observed. "And the geographic reach from where the lawyer is to where the client is."
Fulton predicted the bill will improve the quality of public defense. He hopes to see the new state office taking cases by the end of this year, following the creation of a Commission on Indigent Legal Services and hiring and training attorneys.
It is still undecided how the program will be funded long-term. Indigent defendants are expected to pay back the costs of their legal services.
Samantha Chapman, advocacy manager for the American Civil Liberties Union of South Dakota, urged changes to the practice.
"We hope that there'll be future policy reform bills changing the way that the state is recouping the costs from those indigent defendants, many of which will never be able to pay off their debt," Chapman stressed.
The changes to the system are projected to cost the state $1.4 million annually, and save counties more than $1.5 million.
get more stories like this via email
A man from Dothan, Alabama, serving a life sentence for selling drugs received a presidential pardon, which sparked discussions about long sentences for marijuana-related offenses.
As President Joe Biden granted forgiveness to Earlie Deacon Barber, advocates for changing the current drug laws emphasized the need for broader reforms for marijuana-related charges.
Paul Armentano, deputy director of the advocacy group NORML, highlighted the significance of presidential pardons in the overall debate.
"It's an acknowledgment from the most powerful person in the land that we have moved on from these offenses," Armentano asserted. "We're forgiving these people for these offenses, and that this record should not be holding them back from future opportunities."
Barber's life sentence is set to expire April 20. Armentano pointed out a pardon still does not eliminate the challenges faced by people with criminal records in getting jobs and housing. Multiple states have changed their cannabis possession laws and state courts have expunged or sealed the records in more than 2 million marijuana-related cases.
Randall Woodfin, mayor of Birmingham, has pardoned more than 23,000 people with charges dating back to 1990. And he has appealed for stronger federal protections, such as changing the legal classification of cannabis to allow for greater access or fewer restrictions on its use.
Armentano agreed more could be done at the federal level to address the stigma and challenges.
"Because it's Congress that enacted marijuana prohibition, and at the end of the day, it needs to be Congress that has to enact policy to end marijuana prohibition at the federal level," Armentano urged.
He noted NORML advocate Chris Goldstein, a pardon recipient, recently discussed federal cannabis policies with Vice President Kamala Harris.
At present, 24 states allow nonmedical adult use of cannabis, but they are still at odds with federal law, which considers marijuana use illegal.
Disclosure: Just Trust contributes to our fund for reporting on Civil Rights, Criminal Justice, Juvenile Justice, and Social Justice. If you would like to help support news in the public interest,
click here.
get more stories like this via email
Women are treated much differently than men by the criminal justice system, according to a new report detailing how and why mass incarceration is harmful to women in the U.S.
The report said nationwide, more than 190,000 women are behind bars, with the vast majority serving time in local jails.
Mike Wessler, communications director for the Prison Policy Initiative, said it includes about 29,000 women in Mississippi. He argued the system is particularly harsh toward women. One major challenge is receiving sufficient medical care.
"Women are frequently overdosed behind bars; they may have consumed drugs or alcohol at high level before they came to jail," Wessler noted. "And when they're there, the jails don't have the capacity to treat them. So, they often overdose or they detox without any assistance, and it costs them their lives."
Wessler pointed out about 82% of women who are entangled in the legal system are on probation or parole. The other 18% are in jail or prison. The Magnolia State has one of the higher incarceration rates, with more than 1,000 people per 100,000 residents behind bars.
Wessler emphasized around 58% of women who are incarcerated have minor children. Their families often cannot afford cash bail, which is one reason they are trapped in the legal system. Worse yet, he added, the women are typically the primary caregivers for their kids, which may cause their parental rights to be at risk.
"If you can't afford that, you're going to sit in jail until trial, and that can be months and months at a time, in which time you're likely to lose your job, lose your housing, lose custody of your children," Wessler outlined. "Women who are incarcerated don't make enough money to often pay that bail. The average bail in this country is about one year's salary for an incarcerated woman."
The report also echoed concerns about the stark racial disparities in locking people up. It said in Mississippi, white people are incarcerated at a rate of 386 per 100,000 residents. For Black people, the rate is 960.
get more stories like this via email