Tribal advocates keep up legal pressure for fair political maps; 12-member jury sworn in for Trump's historic criminal trial; Healthcare decision planning important for CT residents; Debt dilemma poll: Hoosiers wrestle with college costs.
Civil Rights activists say a court ruling could end the right to protest in three southern states, a federal judge lets January 6th lawsuits proceed against former President Trump and police arrest dozens at a Columbia University Gaza protest.
Rural Wyoming needs more vocational teachers to sustain its workforce pipeline, Ohio environmental advocates fear harm from a proposal to open 40-thousand forest acres to fracking and rural communities build bike trail systems to promote nature, boost the economy.
SEATTLE -- As coronavirus emerged in Washington state, Asian-Americans faced xenophobia and racism, and businesses in Seattle's International District suffered.
Some businesses have gone under and others are in danger of closing. But in March, Sarah Baker and other Seattleites stepped up to create a Facebook group called "Support the ID" - which now has more than 18,000 members - to promote the area's businesses.
Baker is on the board of the Japanese-American Citizens League and grew up visiting the International District. She said most of the businesses are family- and immigrant-run.
"I've had several folks just respond and say how much they appreciate the support and that the page itself has just really brought them a lot of business and it's just been really, really helpful to them during this period," Baker said.
At the end of March, Baker also started a GoFundMe campaign in which donations are used to buy meals from the International District to be delivered to front-line health care workers.
The effort is featured this week in a video from the "In This Together" series by the group Define American. It's the second in this weekly series.
Shauna Siggelkow, head of original content with the group, said they were originally working on a series about immigrant communities coming together, but pivoted with the outbreak of COVID-19. She said folks find out what they're made of in crises like this.
"It's important to us that we're acknowledging the challenges that the Asian-American community is going through right now," Siggelkow said, "but also really highlighting how so many Americans are galvanized to support that community as well and show solidarity with them."
Baker said she's been heartened by all the support for the International District.
"To see average, everyday people going out of their way to support each other and to support the community," Baker said, "it's definitely been a big highlight for me the last couple of months and has been really keeping me going, despite all of the bad stuff that's been happening."
Disclosure: Define American contributes to our fund for reporting on Census, Civic Engagement, Civil Rights, Immigrant Issues. If you would like to help support news in the public interest, click here.
Legislation in Albany would create the first right to counsel for people in immigration court.
The Access to Representation Act would provide immigrants the right to an attorney in their New York immigration cases, ending the tendency to represent themselves if they cannot afford one.
Marlene Galaz, director of immigrant rights policy for the New York Immigration Coalition, described what the bill would do.
"It has a six-year ramp-up to start implementing and building infrastructure," Galaz outlined. "Having a pipeline between law schools for law students to go into immigration practice, and getting to nonprofits and so on."
Galaz noted most opposition centers around the $150 million to fund the program but pointed out the total expenditure is less than 1% of the state's $229 billion budget. She added anti-immigrant rhetoric has also damaged support for the bill. Currently, it is in the state Senate Finance Committee.
The New York City Comptroller's office said enacting the bill would benefit the state financially. It could keep about 53,000 people from being deported, which would result in almost $8.5 billion in local, state and federal taxes over the next 30 years.
Galaz emphasized the influx of migrants has saturated the court system, leading to what could have been an avoidable backlog.
"I firmly believe that if these investments had been made when we first asked for them, I believe, like, three years ago, then we wouldn't be struggling," Galaz contended. "We would have had the infrastructure built to address an increase in welcoming our newest neighbors."
A Vera Institute survey showed 93% of New Yorkers across party lines and regions support access to attorneys for all people, including those in immigration court, and government-funded attorneys for them.
Story has been updated to reflect late-night 5th Circuit Court of Appeals decision.(8:01 a.m. MST, Mar. 20, 2024)
The U.S. Supreme Court handed Texas Gov. Greg Abbott a big but temporary win Tuesday in his battle to stop the flow of migrants crossing the Texas-Mexico border.
Late Tuesday night, the 5th Circuit Court of Appeals put the law known as Senate Bill 4 on hold again. It would give state and local law enforcement the authority to arrest migrants as they cross into the U-S.
The Biden administration argued that the law would interfere with federal immigration law and is unconstitutional.
David Coale, an appellate attorney in Dallas, said if the state gets the authority to make arrests, he thinks it will move with caution.
"I think that Texas will want to make some very high-profile moves under this statute," Coale predicted. "But they also don't want to potentially expose themselves to massive civil rights liability if it turns out they're wrong."
Under SB-4, crossing the border illegally is a Class B misdemeanor, punishable by up to six months in jail. The appeals court hears oral arguments in the case today. Meanwhile, a Mexican government official said his country won't accept migrants deported under SB-4.
The Supreme Court justices did not issue a reason for allowing the law to go into effect and there's been no clear timetable for how or when Texas will start enforcing it. In 2012, the Supreme Court struck down parts of a similar law in Arizona, saying an impasse in Congress over immigration reform did not justify state intrusion.
Coale noted if the law is ultimately upheld, it would give each state the right to make its own immigration laws.
"If you give Texas a pass, you know, New York will have a different policy and California will have a policy and Montana will have a policy," Coale pointed out. "And they will not be consistent."
All six of the court's conservative justices agreed with the decision to allow the law to take effect - a ruling that, at least for now, was in effect for only a few hours.
Both chambers of the New York state Legislature have included coverage for all legislation in their respective budgets.
The bills would update the state's Affordable Care Act Section 1332 waiver to make coverage available for all income-eligible people, regardless of their immigration status. Studies show half of likely undocumented immigrants and around 18% of lawfully present immigrants are uninsured.
Arline Cruz Escobar, health programs director for the group Make the Road New York, said the challenges stemming from a lack of coverage make life harder for the undocumented population.
"A lot of these preventable illnesses are going undetected and so, unfortunately, people are getting sicker," Cruz Escobar pointed out. "It also means that a lot of people who currently are sick aren't able to actually access the medication that they need."
One of the biggest obstacles to passing the bill is anti-immigrant rhetoric spreading across the country. However, many groups across the state submitted testimony declaring their support and need for this bill.
Cruz Escobar argued the growing migrant population in places such as New York City makes the bill more necessary. The New York City Comptroller's Office found the number of migrants not living in New York City but still in its care grew from 276 last May to more than 2,100 last September.
Beyond helping immigrants, supporters said the bill will benefit the state financially. The New York City Comptroller's office estimates passing coverage for all will generate $710 million in annual benefits.
Cruz Escobar described other elements of the bill.
"We have also included in our legislation language around giving the Commissioner of Health the ability to set up guardrails to ensure that for this expansion we don't over-cede the amount of surplus that's available."
She added the commissioner would also ensure there would be no additional cost through state dollars. Estimates showed New York State plans to spend more than $4 billion between 2022 and 2026 on issues related to migrants. Current spending is estimated at around $690 million.
By Max Graham for Grist.Broadcast version by Alex Gonzalez for Arizona News Connection reporting for the Solutions Journalism Network-Public News Serv…
Last year's Medicaid expansion in South Dakota increased eligibility to another 51,000 adults but a new report showed among people across the state wh…