PHOENIX, Ariz. -- Political observers and community organizers are both surprised and disappointed Arizona's 2020 population count fell far short of expectations, denying the 48th state a tenth congressional district.

The official Census Bureau count for Arizona was 7.2 million, about 400,000 fewer people than experts estimated. It's been one of the fastest-growing states in the country in the past decade, with a heavy influx of transplants from cold-weather states and Latino immigrants.

Danaysha Smith, youth justice organizer at the Arizona Coalition for Change, said volunteers spent months working to convince people to participate in the Census, and are devastated by the final count.

"Most of our work that we did was to create a sense of trust with the government and the community, especially communities of color, undocumented communities," Smith explained. "But when you're also trying to undo a lot of that fear and mistrust with the community, and that fear is becoming more prevalent, it's really hard to combat that."

Census officials say Arizona's count fell about 80,000 short of qualifying the state for another seat in the U.S. House of Representatives. Community organizers say it could further dilute political representation for the state's growing Black and Latino populations, and cost Arizonans millions of dollars in federal benefits.

Vianey de Anda, civic engagement communications director for One Arizona's Progress Arizona Institute, said her group was concerned political interference and bureaucratic incompetence could result in a significant undercount.

"Our communities trust us," de Anda asserted. "They know who we are, we've been around and most importantly, I think one of the biggest elements is being able to communicate with them in a language that they understand. So, I think the Census Bureau could have definitely done a lot more."

De Anda added community activists will now focus on making sure the state's remaining congressional districts are redrawn fairly by the state's new Independent Redistricting Commission.

"We still have that process that we can be a part of and make sure that our communities are not divided up," de Anda stressed. "Instead, our community's power is harnessed, so that we elect our politicians and not the other way around."

The next census is in 2030.

As the weather turns colder, two groups of people in one North Dakota city that are generations apart appear to be in good shape to navigate housing issues that might surface this winter and beyond. It's the result of a mentorship initiative.

The Bringing Generations Together project in Grand Forks was funded by an AARP Community Challenge grant. Nearly 20 college students were paired with 10 older residents in an area near the University of North Dakota campus.

Shaylee Miller, project coordinator with Bringing Generations Together, said throughout the fall, the students helped with home and yard tasks while the older residents shared generational wisdom on life skills, including working with landlords.

"I really see this project as providing a space for these generations to connect in a way that they might not have had the chance to before," she explained.

And for the younger residents, Miller hopes they learned a greater sense of community they can bring with them to other towns and cities after graduation. Project leaders say as the initial phase winds down, they are getting positive feedback from participants. With some funding left over, they hope to revive the initiative in the spring.

As older adults juggle costs for things such as medication, Miller said having the students help with certain tasks can ease some of the financial pressure their mentors might be facing.

"So, having students come to your home for an hour to rake [leaves], that can be huge -- not having to pay for a service to do that," Miller added.

This project is tied to University Park Neighborhoods, a collaborative organization aimed at improving the quality of life in northern Grand Forks.

The Community Challenge grant officials used for the fall project was one of six initiatives AARP funded across North Dakota this year.

Child care access has become a major focal point in the U.S., and South Dakota is no exception.

More than two dozen communities are using grant money to come up with local solutions in hopes of expanding options for families. Earlier this week, the governor's office announced more than $1 million in funding will be shared by 28 economic development groups around the state.

Nancy Wenande, CEO of grant recipient Yankton Thrive, welcomed having more resources to help map out a strategy geared for her community.

"Yankton is one of the many communities that has a lot of manufacturing," Wenande explained. "We know we already have a shortage of early morning or evening or weekend child care. So, we're going to be taking a look at are there options there, that we can help fill those gaps."

Wenande pointed out based on local information gathering, Yankton is short around 700 day care spots, forcing some people to stay home with their kids instead of working. The grant program has two phases; a first round focused on planning, and a second in which funding will be provided for implementation of ideas.

Wenande acknowledged low wages for child care staff are a big part of the problem. Whether it is additional help from the state or local planning, she argued sustainability should be the driving force behind any model.

"One-time dollars coming in might help you build a building, or they might help you start a program," Wenande acknowledged. "But if you can't financially sustain that program as well as affordable options for those needing the services, you're really not going to make any progress."

The state is using American Rescue Plan funding to administer the grants. State officials said they had an overwhelming number of applications, suggesting child care access is a critical issue in most South Dakota towns and cities.

The city of Lincoln scores high for "livability," both in Nebraska and the nation as a whole.

In the new AARP Livability Index, Lincoln ranks number one for the state, and number 11 among large communities nationwide. Rankings were based on 61 indicators in seven categories, such as housing, transportation, health status and community engagement. Among Nebraska's top 10 "livable" communities, Holdrege is in second place, and third and fourth are Blair and Seward, respectively.

Todd Stubbendieck, state director of AARP Nebraska, said the ranking speaks well of the state.

"What I think it shows is that cities of any size within our state can be working on these issues and finding ways to become more livable," Stubbendieck contended. "And this is not just livable for people over 50."

In the trademarked AARP Livability Index, users can search by address, city, state or ZIP code to find a score for each of the seven categories, and information about the indicators used to arrive at the score. Demographic and climate information are also included. And for each community, there's an interactive map allowing users to view data even at the neighborhood level.

Stubbendieck pointed out the rankings are based on factors everyone in a community can benefit from.

"People want to be able to age in place, and in order to do that, they need access to affordable housing, health care, good transportation options," Stubbendieck outlined. "I think what we know is that by making our communities more age-friendly, we actually make them better for people of all ages."

Stubbendieck added the Livability Index includes information for people with a variety of backgrounds and interests.

"It's a data-driven look at every community and every neighborhood," Stubbendieck noted. "I think from a perspective of either community leaders or stakeholders or citizens, not only can you see what you're doing well, but you can see those areas in which you might potentially improve, or make improvements."