More than 60% of New York State is considered to be a "child-care desert." But some state initiatives could make care available to more families as they continue to recover from the pandemic.
Some $70 million in grant funding is being made available to new child-care programs in New York locations that don't have a sufficient number of open program spaces.
Democratic Assemblymember Anna Kelles, who represents Tompkins and southwest Cortland counties, spoke to what feeds into limited program slots.
"The incomes for child-care providers, the child-care workers, is so low that child-care facilities are having a hard time building back up to capacity as well," said Kelles. "And that has been a perennial issue."
According to the governor's office, applications to apply for the grant funding will open up in mid-April. Kelles is also co-sponsoring a bill that would extend child-care assistance for some New Yorkers even if they no longer meet the income cutoff.
Parts of every region of New York are designated child-care deserts. But Kelles said another issue within the sector is the out-of-pocket cost to families, which she says her bill would address.
"Child care can be anywhere from 25% to 30% of a person's income," said Kelles. "That's very hard for people to surmount without support if you're technically low income, if not impossible."
The child-care subsidy legislation is currently in the state Senate Children And Families Committee.
Nicole Mason - president and CEO of the Institute for Women's Policy Research - noted that greater access to child care would also allow more women to participate in the workforce, and fill other gaps as well.
"The pandemic revealed that we still have a long way to go," said Mason, "in terms of making sure that working women and families have the support they need."
She said measures like the Build Back Better Act would help increase families' short- and long-term economic stability, in part by extending the Child Tax Credit.
The U.S. Senate has yet to vote on the federal plan.
Disclosure: Institute For Women's Policy Research contributes to our fund for reporting on Budget Policy & Priorities, Livable Wages/Working Families, Women's Issues. If you would like to help support news in the public interest,
click here.
get more stories like this via email
The recent collapse of Silicon Valley Bank and Signature Bank has put a spotlight on the safety and stability of the U.S. financial system. Now, some experts are pointing to a greater role for community banks.
Nuray Ozbay, investment officer for Self Help Federal Credit Union in California, said Community Development Financial Institutions and Minority Depository Institutions, known as CDFIs and MDIs, are comparatively well-capitalized, and with high levels of liquidity.
"Community banks, CDFIs and MDIs are usually financially conservative," Ozbay explained. "They put their members first, and they are usually risk-averse. So, they are safe places to invest."
Silicon Valley Bank focused heavily on startups while Signature Bank had a lot of money tied up in cryptocurrency. Ozbay noted local banks are much less likely to rely on such higher-risk investments.
Brady Quirk-Garvan, co-owner and financial adviser for Natural Investments, which helps people invest their money according to their values, said smaller credit unions are more accountable to their members, because the members are also the banks' main investors.
"They're more likely to take profits from the year and invest it in member services," Quirk-Garvan pointed out. "Whether that's hiring more tellers, or whether it's investing by making loans in a local community bakery, they're making a different set of decisions when it comes to their values."
The Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, the FDIC, keeps the banking system stable by insuring all deposits up to $250,000, no matter the size of your bank.
Disclosure: Self-Help Credit Union contributes to our fund for reporting on Consumer Issues, Environment, Health Issues, and Social Justice. If you would like to help support news in the public interest,
click here.
get more stories like this via email
Mexican fast-food chain Chipotle will pay workers at its former location in Augusta, Maine as part of a settlement over labor law violations. The National Labor Relations Board found the chain of restaurants broke laws by closing the location in July just weeks after employees became the first Chipotle workers in the country to file for union recognition. The company also blacklisted union organizers from being hired at other Chipotle locations.
Brandi McNease, Chipotle United organizer, said the company got the message.
"The union busting will not be tolerated and there's no way around it," she said.
Chipotle will pay a total of $240,000 to employees who were on the payroll when it closed the store, and offer "preferential rehiring" to all Augusta employees at its other Maine locations for up to one year.
The Augusta workers formed their union to bargain for safer working conditions, better staffing and a voice in any negotiations regarding workplace policies, they said. Now stores throughout the Northeast will post notices stating that Chipotle broke the law, and that employees have the right to unionize without consequences.
It is "a win for food service workers everywhere," McNease said.
"We fought for this specifically because the movement isn't over and every employee in those stores should know that they have rights and that the Labor Board is on our side," she added.
Chipotle was not forced to reopen the Augusta location, so workers say the payouts will help those who have yet to secure employment elsewhere, as well as inspire other Chipotle workers to stand up for respectful working conditions.
get more stories like this via email
More than one in three Ohioans are relying on credit cards for spending needs, and nearly a quarter say they've increased their credit-card use in response to cost-of-living increases, according to a new report.
Michael Welker, editor of Upgraded Points, a website tracking credit-card reward and travel programs, explained when the pandemic began, people spent less and got a financial boost from stimulus checks, leading to lower credit-card balances overall. Now, persistent high inflation is causing many to use credit to cover basic household expenses.
Welker said it poses a risk as interest rates rise.
"As you carry over balances month to month, and interest starts to accrue, potentially it's going to be even harder to pay down your debt," Welker advised. "That's going to be even more pressure, in terms of covering your household expenses."
The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau has proposed new regulations which would, among other changes, cap late fees for credit-card payments at 25% of the minimum payment amount. The agency is taking public comments about its proposal until April 3.
According to the report, nationwide more than 95% of people with annual incomes below $75,000 said they are feeling stressed about inflation. Welker recommended using credit cards only when needed to meet basic expenses, and shifting habits instead to reduce dining out, entertainment and other leisure spending.
"Be more mindful of your spending," Welker suggested. "Figure out where you might be able to cut or trim back, find less expensive alternatives."
He added consumers may soon feel relief as the federal government works to combat inflation, but only those who rein in their credit-card use.
"The Fed is still raising interest rates trying to tame inflation," Welker pointed out. "Potentially, at some point later in the year, we finally start to see that come down to a more manageable level."
In another survey, by Clever Real Estate, 40% of Americans believe high prices are the "new normal," and 62% say they expect everyday prices will be even higher this year.
Reporting by Ohio News Connection in association with Media in the Public Interest and funded in part by the George Gund Foundation.
get more stories like this via email