Este noviembre, se incluirá en la boleta electoral una medida para proporcionar matrícula estatal a todos los graduados de las escuelas preparatorias de Arizona, independientemente de su estado migratorio.
Conocida como Prop 308, también garantizaría que los beneficiarios de DACA y los estudiantes indocumentados sean elegibles para becas públicas si han vivido en el estado durante al menos dos años.
Un poco más de dos mil estudiantes indocumentados y beneficiarios de DACA se gradúan de las escuelas preparatorias del estado cada año, y José Patiño, del grupo sin fines de lucro Aliento, dice que a menudo tienen que pagar un 300% más que sus compañeros en colegios comunitarios, y un 150% más en universidades públicas.
"La mayoría de los estudiantes que se gradúan que son indocumentados, estudiantes DACA, simplemente tienen esta barrera que no pueden superar," asegura Patiño. "No pueden pagar la universidad porque no son elegibles para los estudiantes de bajos ingresos, a través de FAFSA, y también se les cobra significativamente más que a sus compañeros."
Señala que algunos estudiantes especialmente exitosos pueden obtener becas privadas, pero cree que es fundamental ampliar el acceso a la universidad para todos los Dreamers. Veintidós estados permiten que los residentes indocumentados califiquen para la matrícula estatal, y Patiño espera que Arizona pronto se una a estos estados.
En 2006, los legisladores de Arizona pusieron otra medida en la boleta electoral, la Prop 300, que prohíbe a estudiantes indocumentados acceder a la matrícula estatal, y fue aprobada.
La Proposición 300 también impidió que los Dreamers obtuvieran asistencia para el cuidado de niños o accedieran a programas de alfabetización y clases de educación para adultos. Pero Patiño dice que no tiene sentido impedir que ningún estudiante desarrolle todo su potencial a través de la educación postsecundaria.
"La educación tiene una experiencia transformadora, específicamente para estudiantes primerizos, de bajos ingresos, estudiantes de primera generación, donde no solo te beneficias a ti mismo, sino que estas cambiando la trayectoria de tu familia," dice Patiño.
Añade que dar a los estudiantes una oportunidad justa, independientemente de su estatus migratorio, ayuda a la economía: los migrantes indocumentados en Arizona aportan cientos de millones de dólares al año, a los impuestos federales, estatales y locales.
La Fundación Lumina proporcionó apoyo para este informe.
get more stories like this via email
From gubernatorial candidate Mark Robinson to Superintendent of Public Instruction hopeful Michele Morrow, some Republicans running for office have suggested North Carolina could reject federal funding for public schools.
The idea is raising red flags for parents and teachers alike. The North Carolina Justice Center estimates turning down federal funding could strip more than $1 billion from schools and result in thousands of job losses.
Justin Parmenter, a teacher in the Charlotte-Mecklenburg School District, thinks it would harm vulnerable student populations and strain already underfunded schools, especially in rural areas.
"Things like providing free and reduced (price) lunch for students who need that support," Parmenter outlined. "It would be serving students with special needs. It would be funding programs like substance abuse and mental health care."
Those who would turn down federal funding said it comes with "strings attached" or requirements they do not agree with. But Parmenter countered he has heard no clear plans on how to offset the nearly $1.7 billion shortfall it would create. He stressed a lack of a concrete strategy raises serious concerns about deeper cuts to public education.
Claire Kempner is a parent of three public school students voicing similar concerns, particularly about how cuts would affect rural areas and the quality of education. She worries about teacher retention in the face of low pay.
"We have a really hard time retaining teachers, especially in more rural areas of the state, like where I live," Kempner explained. "Teachers are not paid well enough, where they can live off of their salary. They're going to go to other areas or they may even leave the state completely."
The North Carolina Justice Center reported rejecting federal funds for North Carolina schools would lead to wider gaps in racial and economic opportunities.
get more stories like this via email
Colorado voters will decide whether to change the state's constitution to ensure families have school choice as a fundamental right.
Kallie Leyba, executive director of the American Federation of Teachers-Colorado, worries Amendment 80 on November's ballot would hurt the state's already underfunded public schools by diverting taxpayer dollars into a private school voucher program.
"Which would put Colorado's budget on the hook for paying for private education," Leyba pointed out. "It would drain the resources that the 95% of kids in Colorado who are attending public schools rely on."
Colorado students already have the right to attend any public school, including charter schools, regardless of where they live under the state's Public Schools and Choice Law. State law also allows families to home school or enroll in private school. Proponents of Amendment 80 said it will cement those rights into the state's constitution and protect parents' rights to educate their children the way they believe is best.
Josh Cowen, senior fellow at the Education Law Center, pointed to decades of evidence showing private school vouchers have led to some of the steepest declines in student achievement on record.
He added measures similar to Amendment 80 passed in Arizona, Florida and Ohio have led to serious budget cuts.
"Those states are spending a billion dollars each right now on vouchers, primarily for kids who are already in private school," Cowen explained. "When you're spending that kind of money on private religious education, you're not spending money on other things."
Leyba argued Amendment 80 could also harm Colorado students in rural parts of the state who depend on public schools.
"We have quite a few districts that are considered rural," Leyba noted. "Those kids don't have the options of private schools. Public schools are their option, and it's really important that we keep those public schools strong."
Disclosure: The American Federation of Teachers contributes to our fund for reporting on Education, Health Issues, Livable Wages/Working Families, and Social Justice. If you would like to help support news in the public interest,
click here.
get more stories like this via email
Palm Beach County schools are working to curb chronic absenteeism, which has surged since the pandemic.
Nearly 39% of Palm Beach County students missed 11 or more days of school last year.
Keith Oswald, chief of equity and wellness for the Palm Beach County School District, said families often face a combination of challenges triggering absences, so the district uses a variety of strategies, including sending notifications to parents when students reach five, 10 or 20 missed school days.
"I would say the more common where we see the 10 to 20 day range, I think it's a bad habit that we picked up from COVID of not coming to school that's stuck," Oswald observed. "Thinking that I could just miss a day or two a month is not a big deal but really, we're trying to educate people that it is a big deal."
The 2024 Annie E. Casey Foundation Kids Count Data Book revealed chronic absenteeism nearly doubled nationwide after the pandemic, with 30% of students missing significant amounts of school. The report also emphasized the long-term economic risks of learning loss, with U.S. students potentially facing $900 billion in lost lifetime earnings due to decreased academic achievement.
According to the Florida Department of Education, the statewide average of kids missing 21 or more days of school has modestly improved from a record high of almost 21% in the 2021-22 school year to 19.4% last year.
Oswald said the district also organizes problem-solving meetings with families to address concerns like transportation and housing instability, which can be primary causes of absenteeism.
"Sometimes it comes with employment; there's sometimes mental health issues in the family," Oswald outlined. "Food insecurity can come up at times. In our most severe cases, I think it's a sense of despair that a family gets into and needs additional support."
When community outreach fails, Oswald noted Palm Beach County has more formal procedures like working with a local judge on truancy interventions to help families understand the law and find solutions. He added the district needs more support staff to help with this dedicated outreach.
According to the Kids Count data, students in poverty and children of color are disproportionately affected by chronic absences, further widening the achievement gap.
get more stories like this via email