Hispanic and Latino workers have high employment rates in the U.S. but continue to experience a shortage of jobs paying enough to lift them into the middle class, according to a new study.
Jessica Vela, research assistant in tax and budget policy at the Center for American Progress, said America relies on millions of front line workers, but the typically low-wage jobs are often held by people of color, and the darker their skin, the more discrimination they face.
She added many Latino workers, particularly those of Mexican, Guatemalan, Honduran and Salvadoran descent, work in jobs where labor violations are common, including hospitality or caregiving.
"This is the root of systemic racism within the U.S.," Vela asserted. "This can impact individuals trying to find a job, trying to keep a job."
Census data show the percentage of Latino adults with at least an associate's degree is 20 points lower than for white adults. Earlier this year, the Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board began efforts to examine whether a postsecondary degree is producing credentials of value leading to higher earnings for all, and not just some students.
Latinos are 17% of the overall workforce, but represent 24% of the tipped worker population. According to the report, tipped workers often make subminimum wages, are at the mercy of the economy, and were laid off by the millions during the pandemic.
Vela added many of them were Hispanic women, who lost jobs at alarming rates starting in April 2020.
"Hispanic women 20 and older experienced one of the highest unemployment rates by race, gender, ethnicity; a little over 20%," Vela reported. "Losing jobs, it can be really difficult with labor markets to find other jobs, leaving them vulnerable to not being able to provide."
The U.S. Hispanic and Latino population is projected to comprise the majority of net new workers this decade. At the same time, the U.S. wage gap is related to education levels, work experience and immigration status.
Advocates want a higher federal minimum wage and more grants to help people afford to go to college or a trade school.
Support for this reporting was provided by Lumina Foundation.
get more stories like this via email
Mississippi's decade-long focus on early literacy has transformed the state.
According to the Mississippi Department of Education, the state's fourth graders are making the nation's largest gains on reading assessments. They once ranked last on the tests. Media reports have dubbed the transformation the "Mississippi miracle."
Harry Patrinos, professor of education policy at the University of Arkansas, said the turnaround is anything but luck.
"Mississippi was 49th in the state in fourth grade reading. In just a decade, they went to 21st place in reading, and these gains continued to impress," Patrinos explained. "The country was hit with the school closures during COVID-19 but since then, Mississippi has not lost anything in terms of learning outcomes, which is rare in the country and the world."
The state's progress stems from its 2013 Literacy-Based Promotion Act, which emphasized speech-based instruction, early intervention and retention for students not meeting reading benchmarks.
Michelle Nowell, executive director of elementary education and reading for the Mississippi Department of Education, said the so-called "miracle" comes from sustained reforms focused on teacher training.
"We have renamed it the Mississippi Marathon," Nowell noted. "When I say we, I mean the department, the literacy coaches, because it really was a marathon, not a miracle because so much hard work went into it."
Nowell believes it is the human element behind the policy success, describing how literacy coaches from the state's education department built trust in schools across the state.
"In the past, anytime you mentioned MDE and MDE visiting a school district, it wasn't always a good thing," Nowell acknowledged. "It was either for an audit, and we wanted to change that perception. It's not a gotcha, we're here to help you. So we had to really build those relationships."
According to Patrinos, the reforms had an extra cost of $32 per student annually. The Trump administration recently announced $132 million in cuts to Mississippi's education funding, threatening the long-term success of its literacy programs.
get more stories like this via email
North Dakota's legislative session is scheduled to end in May, and the issue of using public funds for what's called school choice remains unresolved.
Republican lawmakers are pushing competing bills that would create Education Savings Accounts, giving North Dakota families money to enroll their kids in private schools.
One cleared the state Senate last week after winning House approval, and now both chambers have to sort out the differences. A separate measure has advanced, but not quite as far.
Superintendent Rick Diegel of the Kidder County School District said he doesn't want either one becoming law, noting small public schools like his need the money instead.
"I could use a STEM teacher out here, and our school used to offer family consumer science," said Diegel. "Those CTE programs are vital for kids that decide they don't want to be doctors and lawyers and such. However, because of the cost, I had to cut that program."
He and other bill opponents, including some Republicans, argue private schools are hard to come by in rural counties - and don't have to accept everyone who applies.
But supporters say parents should have more choice, especially if they feel their child needs a more personalized learning environment.
State Sen. Michelle Axtman, R-Bismarck, is a main sponsor of an ESA bill that would allow eligible families to use their funds for specialized public school programming, not just private school enrollment.
"Students do not learn in a one size fits all approach," said Axtman, "and that demand has transferred to our school systems."
But Nick Archuleta, president of the teacher's union ND United, warned about going down the school choice path.
He said with North Dakota raising the threshold for ballot initiatives to pass, now at 60%, local districts are in a tougher position to win local support for funding critical needs.
"We've had 58%, 59% of voters in specific communities vote to do something positive," said Archuleta, "to build either a new school or refurbish an existing school. And they aren't able to get the bonding because it wasn't 60%."
Disclosure: North Dakota United contributes to our fund for reporting on Children's Issues, Education, Livable Wages/Working Families. If you would like to help support news in the public interest,
click here.
get more stories like this via email
The Texas school voucher program is on its way back to the Senate, after it was approved by members of the House of Representatives in an 85 to 63 vote.
Senate Bill 2 would give families a taxpayer-funded $10,000 voucher for private school. The $1 billion voucher program was Gov. Greg Abbott's top priority for the session.
It's also supported by President Donald Trump, who spoke with Republican lawmakers in the Texas House before they approved the voucher proposal.
Texas American Federation of Teachers President Zeph Capo said he's more concerned with how the bill was passed than the actual legislation.
"When you can level that level of threat, when you can have that much control over who's elected to office," said Capo, "the people don't stand a chance until the people decide to completely do away with who's sitting in power."
In a written statement, Gov. Abbott said it is an extraordinary victory for the thousands of parents who have advocated for more choices when it comes to the education of their children.
Also moving to the Senate is House Bill 2, which would increase the amount of money school districts get by $395 per student and give teachers a pay increase.
Capo said while that's a small victory, Texas schools are still severely underfunded.
"Since there hasn't been any increase since 2019, and when you add the inflationary degradation of schools' buying power to those numbers," said Capo, "it would take about $1,000 more just to bring us back to where we were in 2019."
The allotment would automatically increase every two years, and lawmakers could also increase the amount while the bill is in committee.
The nonprofit Every Texan is also opposed to the voucher bill. The group's Director of Policy and Advocacy Chandra Villanueva said private school vouchers will only hurt low-income kids.
"Even with some tuition assistance for the really high-performing, elite private schools," said Villanueva, "low-income parents will never be able to access those schools, let alone get their children accepted into them. So we see the voucher as a giveaway for wealthy families."
Disclosure: Texas AFT contributes to our fund for reporting on Education, Livable Wages/Working Families, Mental Health, Youth Issues. If you would like to help support news in the public interest,
click here.
get more stories like this via email