UPDATE: This story was modified 10/26/2022 at 2:30pm MST to reflect a request for comment from The California Alliance of Pregnancy Care, which represents pregnancy resource centers across the state.

CLARIFICATION: Information was added to this story from the California Alliance of Pregnancy Care. (7:30 p.m. PDT, Nov. 1, 2022)


In the wake of the Supreme Court decision to overturn Roe v. Wade, Crisis Pregnancy Centers are drawing more scrutiny.

In June, California Attorney General Rob Bonta warned the centers advertise reproductive health care services, but their true mission is to dissuade people from seeking an abortion.

Stephanie Peng, senior manager of movement research for the National Committee for Responsive Philanthropy, said the centers sometimes make false claims about the risks of the procedure.

"There are really intentional practices to lure people who are seeking abortion information," Peng contended. "And then really mislead them away from having an abortion without giving them a choice to even think about it."

Allison Martinez with the California Alliance of Pregnancy Care said in a statement that state-licensed pregnancy help centers are "committed to honesty, and use only licensed professionals to perform medical procedures, including ultrasounds."

She added that centers without a medical license do not represent themselves as providing medical services, and all centers agree to not obstruct or delay a decision to terminate. Martinez described most centers as "faith-based and nonprofit, each with its own governing board," and said many offer pregnancy classes and free diapers.

State data show 179 such centers operate in California.

A recent report from the National Committee for Responsive Philanthropy looked at Internal Revenue Service records and found the centers and their tax-affiliated organizations took in $4 billion from 2015 to 2019.

Peng pointed out the centers often have ties to much larger organizations, many affiliated with the right-to-life movement.

"There's this common misconception that CPCs are just really small, individual-run organizations that are all volunteer-based; they might be operating out of a church," Peng noted. "But what we found is that $4 billion is a substantial amount of revenue that they are getting. "

The report recommended charitable donors and foundations check to see if the organizations they support are funneling money to the centers.

Fourteen states moved to ban or severely restrict abortion since the Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade earlier this summer. Peng added donors concerned about the right to choose may want to contribute to groups helping low-income women who may have to travel out of state for the procedure.

"The philanthropy and foundation sector really needs to support the local and state-based abortion funds," Peng urged. "Who are really providing the financial and practical assistance to individuals who are seeking abortion care."



get more stories like this via email

A new report argued many charitable foundations need to examine the origin of their wealth and repair harms done.

The National Committee for Responsive Philanthropy used publicly available information to examine how historic business fortunes behind some foundations were made. Drawing on historic examples of businesses profiting from systemic racism and discrimination, the report titled "Cracks in the Foundation" stressed the need for philanthropic organizations to do their own research, connect with Black communities, and move charity dollars toward repairs.

Claire Dunning, assistant professor of Public Policy at the University of Maryland, served on the report's advisory committee and said foundations can seek partnerships including local history centers to help with the process.

"This doesn't have to be a private, or sort of closed-off process," Dunning contended. "It can be one rooted in transparency and inviting people in. And again, that can be uncomfortable. But I would argue that's not an excuse to not begin this important work."

The report presented case studies tracking the economic history of eight foundations in the Washington, D.C., area. The study's authors said they seek to make difficult conversations easier and are presenting the case studies as educational guides for an accountability and healing journey.

In looking at historic harms, the report focused on four sectors: media including anti-Black rhetoric; housing including discrimination, segregation and displacement; employment including stolen labor; and health care including mental and physical harm and neglect. The report assessed harm using both quantitative and qualitative methods. Dunning stressed in looking to the historical record to find evidence of past harm, researchers must take a broad view.

"We need to think about how newspaper accounts or advertisements for a particular neighborhood that talk about restrictive covenants. That's a form of evidence," Dunning pointed out. "We can think about oral histories of people who are displaced from certain neighborhoods or who were denied equal wages in an employment situation, that's a form of evidence."

The Federal government requires private foundations to use their assets to benefit society. Each year they must distribute at least 5% of the market value of their endowment to charitable purposes.


get more stories like this via email

A new report said philanthropic organizations need to reexamine the source of their wealth, which it asserted often came from systemic racism and discrimination, and stressed the need to repair the harm done to Black communities.

Called "Cracks in the Foundation," the report from the National Committee on Responsive Philanthropy examines at the histories of eight grantmakers.

Katherine Ponce, research manager of special projects for the committee, explained how the report was developed.

"There's four categories of harm we focus on," Ponce pointed out. "It's anti-Black media and rhetoric, housing discrimination and segregation, unemployment and hidden opportunity, and then health care, both mental and physical."

The report urged grantmakers to reckon with their past, connect with harmed communities, work to repair the damage, make sure any harm doesn't continue and advocate for funding for reparations. While the report focuses on the Washington, D.C., area, it mentions California's Task Force to Study and Develop Reparation Proposals for African Americans as an encouraging development.

Hanh Le, co-CEO of if: A Foundation for Radical Possibility, which commissioned the report and is one of the institutions examined, said her organization once believed the money to endow the foundation came from a health association jointly created by Black and Jewish workers when in fact, the agency initially excluded Black workers.

"Every foundation has an origin story that we believe ties the wealth that generated the endowment for those foundations to racialized capitalism, to structural racism," Le contended. "We all have an obligation to know that truth, to reckon with the truth and to repair the harm."

Debra Watkins, founder and executive director of San Jose-based ABEN, which stands for A Black Education Network, said to play a role in repair, grantmakers should invest in Black-led organizations, which still only get a fraction of the billions given annually.

"Foundations that have amassed their wealth as a result of harm done to Black people over decades, now have an obligation to fund Black-led work," Watkins urged. "And also to ameliorate conditions under which Black people still live."

get more stories like this via email

On Giving Tuesday tomorrow, donating money isn't the only way to support the groups and causes you care about.

The global Giving Tuesday movement promotes "radical generosity," defined as "the concept that the suffering of others should be as intolerable to us as our own suffering."

Millions of people in the U.S. pledged a total of over $3 billion on Giving Tuesday last year - a 15% increase over 2021.

Philanthropy Ohio President and CEO Deborah Aubert Thomas said by occurring during the holiday season, Giving Tuesday lends itself to a particular type of giving.

"I think the timing of Giving Tuesday really gives the opportunity to focus on the things that we are all giving thanks for on Thanksgiving," said Thomas, "things that we know not everyone in our communities have access to - food and housing and just basic human securities."

Thomas said in 2020 - the most recent year for which IRS data is available - nearly 4,000 Ohio foundations donated $1.94 billion.

She explained that because fewer people itemize on their tax returns since the 2017 tax changes, it's hard to assess individual giving.

But prior to tax law changes, total giving by individual Ohioans was triple that of foundation giving. And the majority was by households with annual incomes of between $50,000 and $200,000.

She said children can learn about philanthrophy by sharing their "time, talent and treasures" at a young age.

"One of the best ways to do that is through community service and volunteering," said Thomas. "And through that learning about what the issues are in their communities, so that they can connect to what is sort of their passion and where they see they would like to make a difference, both with their time as well as through their giving."

Pointing out that philanthropy is defined as love of humankind and love of mankind, Thomas said it can start in your own neighborhood.

"Every community and even every neighborhood has unique needs," said Thomas. "And I think for folks to get off of their screens and learn about their neighbors and where there's need. I think philanthropy is - it's a state of mind as much as it is an activity."

The Giving Tuesday website reports that more than three-fourths of acts of generosity are non-monetary.

This story was produced in association with Media in the Public Interest and funded in part by the George Gund Foundation.




get more stories like this via email